The case of Madeleine McCann

[mike tesko]

It remains highly probable / possible that sometime after 8.30pm on 'Thursday, 3rd May 2007 that the corpse of Madeleine McCann, [or `her pink pyjamas`] was returned and left in the shrubbery of the garden of apartment 5A on the pool side of the family apartment, and that along with the body were written instructions designed to create a bond between the perpetrator(s) and the parents. This could be proven, by 'examination of the pink pajamas' which the 'McCann parents' displayed during a tv interview, [claiming that the garments were a replica, of the original items worn by 'Madeleine on the evening she alledgedly disappeared'] ..

Part of this event, could have involved the use of a dictaphone, in which one or other of the McCann parents, was encouraged to respond to the terms of the satanists, or would be [was] abductor(s)...

[mike tesko]

'Russell O'brien' and 'Jane Tanner' are key 'foot Soldiers'  involved in the staged disappearence of 'Madeleine McCann' claimed to have been discovered missing, at about 10.00pm on the evening '3rd May 2007', by 'Kate McCann', [the mother of the victim] who at that time, [she] was doing a check of 'apartment 5A', and checking on the safety or otherwise of her three young children who were sleeping inside...

[mike tesko]

'Russell O'brien' and 'Jane Tanner' are key 'foot Soldiers'  involved in the staged disappearence of 'Madeleine McCann' claimed to have been discovered missing, at about 10.00pm on the evening '3rd May 2007', by 'Kate McCann', [the mother of the victim] who at that time, [she] was doing a check of 'apartment 5A', and checking on the safety or otherwise of her three young children who were sleeping inside...

(1) - General build, and facial features of 'Russell O'brien' and 'Gerald McCann' when 'both' or 'one' and / or 'the other' are 'seen in 'a dim light', 'night-time', or in 'fleeting glance confrontation' could easily have been 'mistaken for [either] eachother'...

(2) - refer to the 'Jane Tanner' sighting [saw a dark haired man carrying a child matching 'Madeleine McCann' ['age group', 'clothing', direction of travel', 'ect']

(3) - ' refer to the' Smith family' sighting ['saw a man carrying a child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea', 'age group of child', 'clothing', 'direction of travel', 'confrontation' very close to 'LuzDoc' which provided 24 hr medical access (emergency phone number for `late evening` and `night time diagnosis` and `treatment`) to residents and tourists', alike]. Also, consider the fact that 'at least one member' of the 'Smith contingent', identified 'the man' who was 'carrying the child'  in 'the direction of the sea' / 'beach' at around 10.00pm, was / is 'Gerald McCann'..

(4) - 'Russell O' brien' was 'absent from the tapas bar' at the time that 'Madeleine McCann' allegedly went missing from apartment 5A [between around 9.05pm ('Gerald McCann') check, and 10.00pm ('Kate McCann') check. 'Russell O'brien and' Mathew Oldfield' left the tapas restuarant  bar between 9.20pm and 9.30pm on the evening of Thursday 3rd May 2007, in order to 'check on their own children' and the 'McCann apartment' Only 'Mathew Oldfield returned to the tapas bar [`after these checks'] informing others that 'Russell' was! 'staying back at his apartment' because 'one of his daughters' was 'unwell'. Consider, whether or not, with the alleged 'sick daughter' belonging to 'Jane Tanner' and 'himself' if 'their daughter' was the child [allegedly] seen by 'Jane Tanner'(around 9.10pm) and 'the Smith family' (10.00pm, or thereabouts')?

[Steve_uk]

'Russell O'brien' and 'Jane Tanner' are key 'foot Soldiers'  involved in the staged disappearence of 'Madeleine McCann' claimed to have been discovered missing, at about 10.00pm on the evening '3rd May 2007', by 'Kate McCann', [the mother of the victim] who at that time, [she] was doing a check of 'apartment 5A', and checking on the safety or otherwise of her three young children who were sleeping inside...

I don't think doctors would cover for other doctors in this situation. They were more professional colleagues than personal friends.

[Steve_uk]

Could anybody school me in the psychology of prisoners? https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-detectives-hope-prime-21433953

[lookout]

I can't see that a tougher prison environment is going to make a scrap of difference as regards any sort of confession or even a hint, Steve. This is going nowhere.
Way back in the investigation, Raymond Hewlett, a paedophile, was named as the prime suspect. This chap was also dodgy and he had a German wife and a trail of kids tagging along, one of which was killed ? in a road accident. He was hanging around the apartment at the time.

[mike tesko]

I don't think doctors would cover for other doctors in this situation. They were more professional colleagues than personal friends.

That may be true, or not - but the 'individual accounts' given in 'tv interviews', and 'witness statement accounts' , are 'in conflict' and 'at odds' with one another'. The 'general timeline' which members of this group provided 'is' / 'are', 'inconsistent', and 'contradictory' , when 'laid out bare against what others have said' . Both times lines of the  'alleged same event' by 'these'/ those' doctors 'cannot be true'. This clearly 'indicates to me' that this particular group of doctors 'have', and 'continue to cover up' the 'true facts' surrounding 'what' actually happened to 'Madeleine McCann'..

[mike tesko]

'Gerald McCann' and 'Russell O'brien' [Look alike attributes] - especially, 'in poor light' or 'fleeting glance confrontations'..

[mike tesko]

Tenuius links between, what occurred inside 'apartment 5A' (Ocean Club) involving 'Madeleine McCann' on the evening '1st May 2007', between '10.30pm' - '11.45pm', the cover up which took two more days (until evening of 3rd May 2007) to try and explain the circumstances of 'Madeleines absence' , and the possible use of one of the 'Obrien' / 'Tanner' daughters, disguised as 'Madeleine', a child who was 'taken ill' on the same evening that 'Madeleine' was reported 'gone' and 'taken'..

[mike tesko]

Tenuius links between, what occurred inside 'apartment 5A' (Ocean Club) involving 'Madeleine McCann' on the evening '1st May 2007', between '10.30pm' - '11.45pm', the cover up which took two more days (until evening of 3rd May 2007) to try and explain the circumstances of 'Madeleines absence' , and the possible use of one of the 'Obrien' / 'Tanner' daughters, disguised as 'Madeleine', a child who was 'taken ill' on the same evening that 'Madeleine' was reported 'gone' and 'taken'..

Creche records that were faked, covering attendences and activities at the kids club, on 2nd and 3rd May 2007, when and during which 'Madeleine' was not present..

[mike tesko]

Creche records that were faked, covering attendences and activities at the kids club, on 2nd and 3rd May 2007, when and during which 'Madeleine' was not present..

The 'Obrien' /'Tanner' substitute,' [`lookalike'] daughter', may have been used, dressed in 'Madeleine McCanns' clothing and this could have been sufficient into 'fooling the childcare workers' into accepting that 'Madeleine' had been 'in attendance at the creche' and 'elsewhere' [Beach] during the '2nd' and '3rd' of 'May 2007'..

This could help to account for why the 'McCann parents' ended up in possession of their 'daughters pink pyjama set' weeks after her alleged 'abduction', when 'the parents' appeared 'live' in a tv interview 'displaying the said pyjamas' [which they would later claim, was a duplicate version] without saying 'how, they had come into possession of them'..

[mike tesko]

It remains highly probable, that the 'Smith family' sighting at around 10.00pm of a man carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach, was non other than 'Russell O'brien' who 'was carrying his own sick daughter' (and if stopped, or identified would claim that he was carrying his ill daughter' intending to visit 'Luzdoc'  in order to get his daughter looked at, and possible treatment...

The journey which I feel 'Obrien' made, was designed to create interest  in the identity of the abductor of 'Madeleine' on that same evening. Overnight, with 'Russell O' brien and [their own] daughter safely returned to their `own apartment`, hence, 'Jane Tanner' eventually coming up trumps on the following morning by `declaring that on the previous evening` when 'she' had left the tapas restuarant bar' intent on checking her `own two children` in her `own apartment`, that `she had seen a man`, crossing over the junction at the top of the road carrying a child in his arms, `walking away from the vicinity of the car park side of apartment block five`. This alleged sighting of a faceless 'Tannerman', was reference to the fact that by the following morning, after 'Madeleine McCanns' disappearence had been covered by the media [worldwide], she convinced herself that her partner [Russell O'Brien] could become a suspect in the scripted 'Abuction' story, introduced to displace. The true circumstances of 'Madeleine McCanns' plight two days earlier, than it was alledged to have occurred'..

[mike tesko]

'Jane Tanners' account regarding her leaving the restuarant at about 9.10pm, on that crucial evening [3rd  May 2007] to check on her daughters back at her apartment, raises a number of significant issues (a) - the claim that after exiting the small reception door of the 'Ocean Club' that she had seen 'Gerald McCann' and 'Wilkes' talking to each other in the street ('McCann on the pavement adjacent to the alleyway on the poolside of apartment block 5'). 'Wilkes was standing more or less in the middle of the roadway, and he had a pushchair in his possession. It appeared that' Wilkes' and the pushchair had arrived in-situ after 'having walked up hill' past the small 'Ocean Club' entrance..

Bearing this in mind, 'both men' would have been 'facing' , or having their 'heads' , 'pointing toward' or 'looking at eachother'. Under such circumstances, 'how is /was it possible' for either man not to have seen or at least acknowledged the presence of 'Jane  Tanner, approaching and passing them both, since in all such circumstance, some sort of a manouvre would have had to take place enabling' Jane Tanner' to get past 'Gerald McCanns' on that narrow footpath on apartment block 5 side of the road, and that when, and if she had done this, that 'Wilkes' who would have been facing 'McCann' would inevitably have seen 'Jane Tanner'walking uphill on the same pavement that' McCann' was standing on. He would also have seen how close 'Jane Tanner' came and went beyond 'McCann', yet both 'McCann' and 'Wilkes' say they have no recollection of seeing 'Jane Tanner' in the street on that occasion..

[mike tesko]

 The late introduction of 'Tannerman' by 'Jane Tanner' [on the morning of 4th May 2007] was insurance that even if someone had recognised 'Russell O'Brien' carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach on the previous evening [3rd May 2007], that this placed more emphasis 'on the identity of the' Jane Tanner' suspect being 'the abductor'...

[mike tesko]

The late introduction of 'Tannerman' by 'Jane Tanner' [on the morning of 4th May 2007] was insurance that even if someone had recognised 'Russell O'Brien' carrying a young child in his arms heading in the direction of the sea and beach on the previous evening [3rd May 2007], that this placed more emphasis 'on the identity of the' Jane Tanner' suspect being 'the abductor'...

'Jane Tanners', 'Tannerman suspect', did not exist!