Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 876430 times)

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4395 on: October 01, 2019, 09:57:PM »
Why did Jane Tanner not realise her own daughter was unwell, when she went to check it after 9.10pm. If we are to believe what they are telling us, because Russell O'Brien did not leave the Tapas bar until 9.30pm that particular evening to do his check of their apartment, it turned out to be something  rather dramatic that within the space of 15 to 20. Minutes that there own daughters health had taken a turn for the worst...

More worryingly, is the fact that the O'Brien  /Tanner daughters health had got worse during the same 15 to 20 minute period that Madeleine had potentially gone missing from apartment 5A, or if we are to believe that Tannerman was the true abductor, conveniently introduced by Jane Tanner at around 9.10pm, some 20 minutes or so before O'Brien did his 9.30pm check -  where was Jane Tanner when Russell O'Brien left the Tapas restaurant to do his 9.30pm check of their apartment?  Similarly, mystery surrounds the whereabouts of Jane Tanner at the time Kate claims that she discovered Madeleine had been taken at 10pm?

Seems somewhat obvious to me that Tanner and O'Brien were involved in the getting rid of Madeleine's body, because within a one hour period both are absent from the Tapas restaurant giving either or both the opportunity to take part as accomplices in the cover up. For example, Jane Tanner at around 9.10pm, and Russell O'Brien nearer 10pm, or vice versa...
A good podcast here concerned amongst other things with the Tanner and Smith sightings, the possible involvement of Robert Murat and the movements of Gerry McCann on that fateful night..https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12212288
« Last Edit: October 01, 2019, 10:00:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4396 on: October 01, 2019, 10:06:PM »
Just to be clear the podcast entitled "Man With No Face" occurs about halfway down the page. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12212288

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4397 on: October 02, 2019, 08:43:AM »
A good podcast here concerned amongst other things with the Tanner and Smith sightings, the possible involvement of Robert Murat and the movements of Gerry McCann on that fateful night..https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12212288

First and foremost I believe that I am correct in saying that the official timeline of events which focus on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann as having occurred on Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 from 9pm, onwards is nothing but something of a red flag which has been introduced for the specific purpose of altering the date and time of Madeleine 's disappearance / handover/ abduction / death,  etc to a much later date and time, in an attempt to make it appear that the McCann parents and some of their Tapas group friends had not played any sinister role whatsoever in the matter..

Madeleine McCann did not go missing from the McCann apartment (5A) on the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007, she was not abducted on that date, and she did not die in the apartment on that occasion..

One thing which seems a nailed on certainty,  is that on a previous occasion before Wednesday the 3rd May 2007,  that either somebody took Madeleine's body out of the McCann apartment, or escorted her out of there, and took her to another temporary location. Because of this, the PJ were never going to be able to prove that whatever happened to Madeleine McCann, namely that it had occurred on that evening, because it hadn't, and it didn't..
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 08:51:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4398 on: October 02, 2019, 08:54:AM »
Everything leads me to conclude that whatever took place involving Madeleine, which had occurred or took place, did so on an earlier date -  either on the 30th April or 2007, or the 1st May 2007...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 09:05:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4399 on: October 02, 2019, 09:11:AM »
Everything leads me to conclude that whatever took place involving Madeleine, which had occurred or took place, did so on an earlier date -  either on the 30th April 2007, or the 1st May 2007...


The dodgy creche records, covering entries on 1st, 2nd and 3rd May, give a clear indication to me, that the McCann parents, together with some of their closest friends, had two or three days, to come up with a solution without any of them becoming implicated in Madeleine's disappearance..
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 09:12:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4400 on: October 02, 2019, 09:31:AM »

The dodgy creche records, covering entries on 1st, 2nd and 3rd May, give a clear indication to me, that the McCann parents, together with some of their closest friends, had two or three days, to come up with a solution without any of them becoming implicated in Madeleine's disappearance..

The parents account concerning what Madeleine had done during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd May 2007, were made up and designed to fool the local police into running a botched investigation, on the footing that the police would be unable to find any conclusive proof that Madeleine had died in apartment 5A on the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 whilst the McCann parents were at the Tapas restaurant enjoying evening meal and drinks...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 09:32:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4401 on: October 02, 2019, 09:46:AM »
It was important and deemed necessary to fool everyone into believing that Madeleine was still  very much alive and still taking part in creche activities right up until tea time on Wednesday evening..

In order to pull this deception off,  it was necessary for the McCann parents to rely on some of their friends to prove that not only was Madeleine alive, but a child of one of their friends was almost certainly used in a substitution process, and who stayed with the McCann family at apartment 5A, in an attempt to impersonate the now departed, lost, sold, abducted, and returned Madeleine and to her creators from sometime on the evening of the 1st May 2007, onwards, and right up until the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 and the time that Madeleine's disappearance had been alerted to, either by Mathew Oldfield (9pm) or Kate McCann (10pm) that same evening...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 10:46:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4402 on: October 02, 2019, 11:10:AM »

 a child of one of their friends was almost certainly used in a substitution process, and who stayed with the McCann family at apartment 5A, in an attempt to impersonate the now departed, lost, sold, abducted, and returned Madeleine and to her creators from sometime on the evening of the 1st May 2007, onwards, and right up until the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 and the time that Madeleine's disappearance had been alerted to, either by Mathew Oldfield (9pm) or Kate McCann (10pm) that same evening...

Perhaps, Jane Tanners 'exit from the Tapas bar' at around 9.10pm on that Wednesday evening was to collect and remove her daughter from the McCann apartment prior to the alert being broadcast about the abduction, disappearance  and missing Madeleine McCann, or alternatively for her to return to her own apartment, either carrying her daughter back there from the McCann apartment, or before collecting up the body of Madeleine and carrying her off to other accomplices who had access to a vehicle, and upon receiving Madeleine from Jane Tanner, they gave her a lift back to apartment block 5, and or the McCann apartment -  but one thing seems already established and this being that Jane Tanner did not return back at the Tapas restaurant after her original departure at around 9.10pm.  Additionally, there is no reference to Jane Tanner departing the Tapas bar on any second occasion in addition to her original departure from there earlier, so that she could presumably relieve Russell O'Brien from looking after their sick daughter, and he return back to the Tapas restaurant to eat his evening meal...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 11:56:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4403 on: October 02, 2019, 12:05:PM »
There has to be something which links the absences of Jane Tanner and Russell O'Brien from the Tapas bar restaurant, and the claim that their daughter was sick, and the alert that Madeleine McCann had been taken...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4404 on: October 02, 2019, 12:09:PM »
There has to be something which links the absences of Jane Tanner and Russell O'Brien from the Tapas bar restaurant, and the claim that their daughter was sick, and the alert that Madeleine McCann had been taken...

I believe that Jane Tanner carried Madeleine's body in her own arms during a supposed visit and check (9.10pm) of her own apartment. There is no evidence that Tanner left the Tapas restaurant on a second occasion to releive Russell O'Brien..
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 12:29:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4405 on: October 02, 2019, 06:22:PM »
Team McCann have put all their eggs into one basket and chosen to go with and stick with the claim that Madeleine was alive inside apartment 5A until the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007, at which stage she was 'gone' , and was 'missing' , and or was 'abducted' , or 'taken' by 'them', or by 'a couple'. They claim that Madeleine took part in creche and the kids club activities on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd May 2007,  by a reliance on the upon dodgy creche logs. In one particular interview,  Gerry McCann asked the presenter / reporter 'if the parents killed Madeleine and disposed of her body, when exactly did we kill her,  and how could we have hid her body so successfully'  -  when we were 'in the company of so many other people having our evening meal at the Tapas restaurant bar' close to the apartment?

Well, 'you didn't kill her' on the evening Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 and 'you did not get rid of Madeleine's body' whilst you were occupied with eating your evening meal on that same evening. If she died, then she almost certainly died on the 30th April, 2007 or on the 1st May 2007. Yet in view of what is now known, it still remains possible that Madeleine was not killed at all, and that she is  not dead, and that she did not die, and but was part of some sort of a deal where the McCann's had to hand her back over to one or more people who were involved in the 'IVF/ hybrid /alien Cross breeding project treatment',  designed to eventually produce mutational crossbreed humonoids that will become an integral part of the new World order almost being thrust upon mankind..

« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 06:36:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4406 on: October 02, 2019, 06:44:PM »
Team McCann have done nothing but try and force the PJ, the public, and a world audience to prove how they managed to kill Madeleine, and to dispose of her body on a specific date, when they have got the almost perfect alibi capable of exonerating them...
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 06:44:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4407 on: October 02, 2019, 08:33:PM »
Team McCann have put all their eggs into one basket and chosen to go with and stick with the claim that Madeleine was alive inside apartment 5A until the evening of Wednesday the 3rd May 2007, at which stage she was 'gone' , and was 'missing' , and or was 'abducted' , or 'taken' by 'them', or by 'a couple'. They claim that Madeleine took part in creche and the kids club activities on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd May 2007,  by a reliance on the upon dodgy creche logs. In one particular interview,  Gerry McCann asked the presenter / reporter 'if the parents killed Madeleine and disposed of her body, when exactly did we kill her,  and how could we have hid her body so successfully'  -  when we were 'in the company of so many other people having our evening meal at the Tapas restaurant bar' close to the apartment?

Well, 'you didn't kill her' on the evening Wednesday the 3rd May 2007 and 'you did not get rid of Madeleine's body' whilst you were occupied with eating your evening meal on that same evening. If she died, then she almost certainly died on the 30th April, 2007 or on the 1st May 2007. Yet in view of what is now known, it still remains possible that Madeleine was not killed at all, and that she is  not dead, and that she did not die, and but was part of some sort of a deal where the McCann's had to hand her back over to one or more people who were involved in the 'IVF/ hybrid /alien Cross breeding project treatment',  designed to eventually produce mutational crossbreed humonoids that will become an integral part of the new World order almost being thrust upon mankind..
This is all going over my head. The most dramatic and shocking claim in the podcast quoted in #4404 was that the Irishman Smith recognized Gerry as the man he saw carrying a young child in his arms around 9:45pm by the similar way he was carrying Sean down the steps from the aircraft at East Midlands airport when the family eventually came home.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2019, 08:35:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4408 on: October 02, 2019, 09:44:PM »
This is all going over my head. The most dramatic and shocking claim in the podcast quoted in #4404 was that the Irishman Smith recognized Gerry as the man he saw carrying a young child in his arms around 9:45pm by the similar way he was carrying Sean down the steps from the aircraft at East Midlands airport when the family eventually came home.

'Oh, what a tangled Web we weave, when we first practice to deceive'?

Please, consider the following proposition - either the person seen by the Smith contingent really was Gerry (Gerald) McCann, or alternatively it was Russell O'Brien who was seen by the various members of the Smith extended family -  but if it was Russell O'Brien,  He was carrying his own daughter...
« Last Edit: October 03, 2019, 02:40:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4409 on: October 03, 2019, 02:44:AM »
'Oh, what a tangled Web we weave, when we first practice to deceive'?

Please, consider the following proposition - either the person seen by the Smith contingent really was Gerry (Gerald) McCann, or alternatively it was Russell O'Brien who was seen by the various members of the Smith extended family -  but if it was Russell O'Brien,  He was carrying his own daughter...

And, if it was actually Gerry McCann who was seen by the Smith family the child he was carrying was not Madeleine, but the daughter of Jane Tanner and Russell O'Brien.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...