By the time the evening of 3rd May 2007 came around, O'Brien and Jane Tanner introduced the suggestion that their daughter was unwell which caused them to be absent at times from the Tapas bar meal on the last occasion before news broke that Madeleine had gone missing. I think that this purported un - wellness regarding the O'Brien / Jane Tanner daughter on the evening of 3rd May 2007, which paved the way for Russell O'Brien to be absent from the evening meal on the basis that at about 9.30pm he went to do a check of their daughter at that time, and that Mathew Oldfield had also left the restaurant intending to do a similar check on his own apartment and child to be somewhat telling, and that it was already known by people at / in the Tapas bar by around 9.15pm that Madeleine McCann was missing from apartment 5A...
According to the so called Tapas group explanations it wasn't until around 10 pm that Kate McCann discovered 'Madeine to be missing' from the McCann apartment, but this cannot possibly be true because the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was being talked about excitedly some 45 minutes beforehand by a couple sat at one of the restaurant tables - yet to be fully understood, was how this couple could have known that 'Madeleine was missing from apartment 5A' long before Kate McCann supposedly raised the alarm after her 10 pm check?
This brings me on to Mathew Oldfields visit to check apartment 5A at about 9.30 pm that same evening?
According to one of his versions of an explanation 'all was well at apartment 5A' at the time he carried out his 9.30pm check there, but how can this have been true if Jane Tanner had witnessed 'a would be abductor' (the Tannerman sighting) carrying off Madeleine in his arms at about 9.10 pm along with the fact that at least one couple knew that Madeleine was missing by 9.15 pm?