Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 876427 times)

0 Members and 44 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4230 on: July 02, 2019, 12:21:PM »
The McCann parents along with other members of the tapas group dubbed 'the tapas nine' were all aware that if the shutters to the patio door of the McCann apartment 5A were pulled down and locked on the inside that no-one could have left by the patio door on the poolside of the apartment because the mechanism for raising and lowering the steel door shutter were situated on the inside of the living room area.

This means that the occupants of apartment 5A could not have lowered and locked the steel patio door and left by the patio door, because othe
rwise the patio door shutter would have been visibly raised to anyone and everyone who either was on the patio of apartment 5A, or anyone walking in the street who glanced towards apartment 5A's patio and it's door.

Neither Kate or Gerry McCann, or the other group members refer as to whether or not when they either left apartment 5A, or entered it on the evening Thursday 3rd May 2007, that the patio door shutter was lowered, or raised. This is important because the McCann parents could not have left the patio door open on the poolside of their apartment, on that Thursday evening and go dining at the tapas bar restaurant f the patio door shutter was lowered, and locked. However, for the purpose of being complete it is possible for the patio shutter to have been lowered and locked off from the inside, and the patio door to have been left unlocked. Nobody would have been able to enter apartment 5A through the patio door because the mechanism for lowering and raising the steel shutter is located on the inside wall of the apartments living room...

This casts doubt on Gerry McCanns claim that at about 9.05am that when he supposedly went to do his check that he could not have entered apartment 5A via the poolside patio door or leave that way without leaving the patio door shutter raised. Similarly this also applies to the checks done by Mathew Oldfield between 9.20pm, and 9.30pm, or Kate McCanns 10pm visit and check...

Leaving the patio door shutter raised when the McCann parents left or returned to their apartment would have been akin to a red coloured rag to a bull, in other words, inviting trouble. This also applies to Mathew Oldfield when he did his check of the same apartment...

I personally know this to be true because in June 2010 I stayed in apartment  6A in block 6, which is located just across the street where the McCann apartment (5A of block 5) is situated. A part from the fact that the McCann apartment was ground floor being different to where I stayed (which was s first floor apartment) the layout of all the roomsz windows, shutters etc were identical in everyway. I experiment with doors and windows being open and closed in so many different configurations, basically to see which combination of patio door, windows could recreate the slamming of the bedroom door in which the McCann siblings had slept. It was a painstaking exercise, but one which rewarded me in the finding that with the patio door open and the bedroom window of the children's bedroom open, the kids bedroom door would only slam if someone either exited or entered the roadside door of the apartment.

This is important because the roadside door was visible from someone either entering or leaving the apartment by the roadside door.

The testing of this door and window experiment, confirmed to me that the children's bedroom window could have been open, along with the sliding patio door (open), but  the children's bedroom door would not slam shut. It was only with the additional act of opening the roadside door, that the children's bedroom door would slam shut..

What I also discovered was that if the children's bedroom door had slammed shut (as alleged by Kate McCann), this could only happen with the various doors and windows open and or shut. Additionally, I carried out further experiments and I discovered that once the children's bedroom door slammed shut  y the conditions of doors and windows alluded to by me, that the curtains at the children's bedroom window would not always flail open like whoosh, only if the roadside door was still open. If at the point the children's bedroom door slammed shut, the roadside door when closed (Before the bedroom door was open pened again) then the curtains at the children's bedroom window would not flail up..

What this alerted to me was one of two things, (1) Kate McCanns account concerning the slamming of the children's bedroom door and the whooshing of the curtains at the bedroom window is false, or (2) when Kate went into apartment 5A, and by the time the children's bedroom door had slammed shut, there was somebody else there with her. There must have been someone there with her at the apartment when she did her 10pm check - which afforded her the opportunity to race back to the tapas restaurant to raise the alarm, she did not leave her other two children in danger all be, she returned back to the tapas restaurant to raise the alarm that Madeleine had been taken, in the knowledge that someone back at the apartment was watching over her children...

Who was there at the apartment along with Kate when the children's bedroom door slammed to, and when Kate returned to the tapas restaurant to alert everyone that 'They have taken her, they have taken Maddie, she's gone'?
« Last Edit: July 04, 2019, 09:58:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4231 on: July 03, 2019, 03:59:AM »
A member of the Ocean club staff took a pass key for apartment doors in the complex, because a guest had supposedly lost their apartment door key. This occurred at around 9 pm, on Thursday 3rd May 2007. The pass key was obtained from the maintenance office safe, because the other set of keys which was normally kept at the small reception were not available because at that time of the evening the small reception desk was unmanned..

The member of staff who removed the pass key did not divulge to Portuguese police which guest, and which apartment the pass key had been taken from the reception desk. But it is understood that that pass key went missing thereafter ..

I believe that this pass key was used by somebody to unlock the roadside door of apartment 5A at about 9pm, and remove Madeleine's body and that this was initially done in the knowledge of Gerry McCann and Mathew Oldfield, alerted to later on by Kate McCann - 'They've taken her, Madeleine is gone'..
« Last Edit: July 03, 2019, 05:31:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4232 on: July 03, 2019, 05:35:AM »
I believe that this pass key was used by somebody to unlock the roadside door of apartment 5A at about 9pm, and remove Madeleine's body and that this was initially done in the knowledge of Gerry McCann and Mathew Oldfield, alerted to later on by Kate McCann - 'They've taken her, Madeleine is gone'..

Kate's comment about 'they've taken her' was reference to people she knew who had taken Madeleine's body out of the apartment in the disposal of the body phase..
« Last Edit: July 03, 2019, 05:44:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4233 on: July 03, 2019, 06:10:AM »
'They've taken her', not 'He has taken her', or 'She has taken her'.Why was Kate McCann asserting that people had taken Madeleine's body from apartment 5A..
« Last Edit: July 03, 2019, 09:42:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4234 on: July 03, 2019, 10:49:AM »
'They've taken her', not 'He has taken her', or 'She has taken her'.Why was Kate McCann asserting that people had taken Madeleine's body from apartment 5A..

Well, when she supposedly went to apartment 5A,  she met somebody there, someone whom had a pass key for the roadside door of 5A. This seems to me to be proveable that those responsible at different stages of the incident can be identified and that Kate McCann is witholding, the names of the people present at apartment 5A, at around 10pm.The vacuum which caused the children's bedroom door being slammed shut in Kate McCann caused by a combination of the following doors and windows all being open at one and the same time:-

Either, roadside door open, patio door locked or closed, children's bedroom door open, children's bedroom window open (whichever door Kate McCann used to enter apartment 5A at 10pm, roadside door, or the patio door on the poolside of apartment 5A, then the other door was either locked off and closed). Otherwise when Kate entered apartment 5A, through either one of these two external doors, the children's bedroom door would have slammed shut, but Kate doesn't say the children's bedroom door slammed shut when she entered the apartment, what she says is that as she was in the process of closing or setting the children's bedroom door, it slammed shut, this could only have occurred when someone either entered, or exited the apartment door, in particular not the same door used by Kate McCann herself...
« Last Edit: July 04, 2019, 12:03:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4235 on: July 04, 2019, 04:26:PM »
Who was present inside apartment 5A, along with Kate McCann and two of her three siblings, during Kate's 10pm check of the family apartment, on evening Madeleine was discovered missing?

According to all the other tapas 9 group s various accounts, the only adult member of the so called tapas nine group who was not present in the tapas restaurant at around this time was Russell O'Brien, or was it Jane Tanner?
« Last Edit: July 05, 2019, 06:40:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4236 on: July 05, 2019, 06:44:AM »
Who was present inside apartment 5A, along with Kate McCann and two of her three siblings, during Kate's 10pm check of the family apartment, on evening Madeleine was discovered missing?

According to all the other tapas 9 group s various accounts, the only adult member of the so called tapas nine group who was not present in the tapas restaurant at around this time was Russell O'Brien, or was it Jane Tanner?

I suppose it depends on the time the McCann parents and some of their friends, knew that Maddie was dead, and or the actual time her physical body was missing from the apartment on and by the evening of Thursday 3rd May 2007 - 9.15pm, 9.30pm, 9.45pm or 10pm...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4237 on: July 05, 2019, 06:46:AM »
'They've taken her', not 'He has taken her', or 'She has taken her'.Why was Kate McCann asserting that people had taken Madeleine's body from apartment 5A..

Or, 'who has taken her', or ' Somebody has taken her'..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4238 on: July 05, 2019, 06:49:AM »
The use of the term, ' they have taken her' suggests very strongly that she knew who had taken Madeleine from apartment 5A, that evening, irrespective of her having died on Tuesday 1st May 2007, or on Thursday 3rd May 2007..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4239 on: July 05, 2019, 06:50:AM »
The use of the term, ' they have taken her' suggests very strongly that she knew who had taken Madeleine from apartment 5A, that evening, irrespective of her having died on Tuesday 1st May 2007, or on Thursday 3rd May 2007..

'THEY HAVE TAKEN HER'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4240 on: July 06, 2019, 08:50:AM »
I do not believe that the McCann parents acted alone in the concealment and disposal of Madeleine's body after she died on Tuesday 1st May 2007. For example, I do not for one moment believe thatall the other seven adult members of the so called tapas nine group had either any involvement or inclination that Madeleine had died, been concealed or disposed of on that Thursday (3rd May, 2007) evening. But for what it's worth the following members of the group in addition to the McCann parents who did have such knowledge, or who had played some role or other in Madeleine McCanns demise :-

Mathew Oldfield
Russell O'Brien
David Payne
Jane Tanner

Other people who are of particular interest regarding the assault and killing of Madeleine on the evening of Tuesday 1st May 2007, are:-

Ocean Club employee (1)
Ocean club employee (2)
Ocean club employee (3)

Other people who helped in the concealment / disposal of Madeleine McCanns body, or had knowledge that Madeleine McCann was already missing from the McCann apartment long before Kate McCanns alert given at about 10pm, between morning of Wednesday 2nd May 2007 and evening of Thursday 3rd May 2007:-

Robert Murat
Serge Malinka

Stephen Carpenter
Mrs Carpenter
Ocean club restaurant Manager
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 08:52:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4241 on: July 06, 2019, 09:02:AM »
Praia de Luz is not really a holiday destination for parents with young children of Madeleine McCanns age, and toddlers.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 09:03:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4242 on: July 06, 2019, 09:37:AM »
Bridget O'Donnell
December 2007 - The Guardian

My months with Madeleine

It was a welcome spring break, a chance to relax at a child-friendly resort in Portugal. Soon Bridget O'Donnell and her partner were making friends with another holidaying family while their three-year-old daughters played together. But then Madeleine McCann went missing and everyone was sucked into a nightmare
Bridget O'Donnell
 
We lay by the members-only pool staring at the sky. Round and round, the helicopters clacked and roared. Their cameras pointed down at us, mocking the walled and gated enclave. Circles rippled out across the pool. It was the morning after Madeleine went.
Six days earlier we had landed at Faro airport. The coach was full of people like us, parents lugging multiple toddler/baby combinations. All of us had risen at dawn, rushed along motorways and hurtled across the sky in search of the modern solution to our exhaustion - the Mark Warner kiddie club. I travelled with my partner Jes, our three-year-old daughter, and our nine-month-old baby son. Praia da Luz was the nearest Mark Warner beach resort and this was the cheapest week of the year - a bargain bucket trip, for a brief lie-down.

Excitedly, we were shown to our apartments. Ours was on the fourth floor, overlooking a family and toddler pool, opposite a restaurant and bar called the Tapas. I worried about the height of the balcony. Should we ask for one on the ground floor? Was I a paranoid parent? Should I make a fuss, or just enjoy the view?

We could see the beach and a big blue sky. We went outside to explore.

We settled in over the following days. There was a warm camaraderie among the parents, a shared happy weariness and deadpan banter. Our children made friends in the kiddie club and at the drop-off, we would joke about the fact that there were 10 blonde three-year-old girls in the group. They were bound to boss around the two boys.

The children went sailing and swimming, played tennis and learned a dance routine for the end-of-week show. Each morning, our daughter ran ahead of us to get to the kiddie club. She was having a wonderful time. Jes signed up for tennis lessons. I read a book. He made friends. I read another book.

The Mark Warner nannies brought the children to the Tapas restaurant to have tea at the end of each day. It was a friendly gathering. The parents would stand and chat by the pool. We talked about the children, about what we did at home. We were hopeful about a change in the weather. We eyed our children as they played. We didn't see anyone watching.

Some of the parents were in a larger group. Most of them worked for the NHS and had met many years before in Leicestershire. Now they lived in different parts of the UK, and this holiday was their opportunity to catch up, to introduce their children, to reunite. They booked a large table every night in the Tapas. We called them "the Doctors". Sometimes we would sit out on our balcony and their laughter would float up around us. One man was the joker. He had a loud Glaswegian accent. He was Gerry McCann. He played tennis with Jes.

One morning, I saw Gerry and his wife Kate on their balcony, chatting to their friends on the path below. Privately I was glad we didn't get their apartment. It was on a corner by the road and people could see in. They were exposed.

In the evenings, babysitting at the resort was a dilemma. "Sit-in" babysitters were available but were expensive and in demand, and Mark Warner blurb advised us to book well in advance. The other option was the babysitting service at the kiddie club, which was a 10-minute walk from the apartment. The children would watch a cartoon together and then be put to bed. You would then wake them, carry them back and put them to bed again in the apartment. After taking our children to dinner a couple of times, we decided on the Wednesday night to try the service at the club.

We had booked a table for two at Tapas and were placed next to the Doctors' regular table. One by one, they started to arrive. The men came first. Gerry McCann started chatting across to Jes about tennis. Gerry was outgoing, a wisecracker, but considerate and kind, and he invited us to join them. We discussed the children. He told us they were leaving theirs sleeping in the apartments. While they chatted on, I ruminated on the pros and cons of this. I admired them, in a way, for not being paranoid parents, but I decided that our apartment was too far off even to contemplate it. Our baby was too young and I would worry about them waking up.

My phone rang as our food arrived; our baby had woken up. I walked the round trip to collect him from the kiddie club, then back to the restaurant. He kept crying and eventually we left our meal unfinished and walked back again to the club to fetch our sleeping daughter. Jes carried her home in a blanket. The next night we stayed in. It was Thursday, May 3.

Earlier that day there had been tennis lessons for the children, with some of the parents watching proudly as their girls ran across the court chasing tennis balls. They took photos. Madeleine must have been there, but I couldn't distinguish her from the others. They all looked the same - all blonde, all pink and pretty.

Jes and Gerry were playing on the next court. Afterwards, we sat by the pool and Gerry and Kate talked enthusiastically to the tennis coach about the following day's tournament. We watched them idly - they had a lot of time for people, they listened. Then Gerry stood up and began showing Kate his new tennis stroke. She looked at him and smiled. "You wouldn't be interested if I talked about my tennis like that," Jes said to me. We watched them some more. Kate was calm, still, quietly beautiful; Gerry was confident, proud, silly, strong. She watched his boyish demonstration with great seriousness and patience. That was the last time I saw them that day. Jes saw Gerry that night.

Our baby would not sleep and at about 8.30pm, Jes took him out for a walk in the buggy to settle him. Gerry was on his way back from checking on his children and the two men stopped to have a chat. They talked about daughters, fathers, families. Gerry was relaxed and friendly. They discussed the babysitting dilemmas at the resort and Gerry said that he and Kate would have stayed in too, if they had not been on holiday in a group. Jes returned to our apartment just before 9.30pm. We ate, drank wine, watched a DVD and then went to bed. On the ground floor, a completely catastrophic event was taking place. On the fourth floor of the next block, we were completely oblivious.

At 1am there was a frantic banging on our door. Jes got up to answer. I stayed listening in the dark. I knew it was bad; it could only be bad. I heard male mumbling, then Jes's voice. "You're joking?" he said. It wasn't the words, it was the tone that made me flinch. He came back in to the room. "Gerry's daughter's been abducted," he said. "She ..." I jumped up and went to check our children. They were there. We sat down. We got up again. Weirdly, I did the washing-up. We wondered what to do. Jes had asked if they needed help searching and was told there was nothing he could do; she had been missing for three hours. Jes felt he should go anyway, but I wanted him to stay with us. I was a coward, afraid to be alone with the children - and afraid to be alone with my thoughts.

I once worked as a producer in the BBC crime unit. I directed many reconstructions and spent my second pregnancy producing new investigations for Crimewatch. Detectives would call me daily, detailing their cases, and some stories stay with me still, such as the ones about a girl being snatched from her bath, or her bike, or her garden and then held in the passenger seat, or stuffed in the boot. There was always a vehicle, and the first few hours were crucial to the outcome. Afterwards, they would be dumped naked in an alley, or at a petrol station with a £10 note to "get a cab back to Mummy". They would be found within an hour or two. Sometimes.

From the balcony we could see some figures scratching at the immense darkness with tiny torch lights. Police cars arrived and we thought that they would take control. We lay on the bed but we could not sleep.

The next morning, we made our way to breakfast and met one of the Doctors, the one who had come round in the night. His young daughter looked up at us from her pushchair. There was no news. They had called Sky television - they didn't know what else to do. He turned away and I could see he was going to weep.

People were crying in the restaurant. Mark Warner had handed out letters informing them what had happened in the night, and we all wondered what to do. Mid-sentence, we would drift in to the middle distance. Tears would brim up and recede.

Our daughter asked us about the kiddie club that day. She had been looking forward to their dance show that afternoon. Jes and I looked at each other. My first instinct was that we should not be parted from our children. Of course we shouldn't; we should strap them to us and not let them out of our sight, ever again. But then we thought: how are we going to explain this to our daughter? Or how, if we spent the day in the village, would we avoid repeatedly discussing what had happened in front of her as we met people on the streets? What does a good parent do? Keep the children close or take a deep breath and let them go a little, pretend this was the same as any other day?

We walked towards the kiddie club. No one else was there. We felt awful, such terrible parents for even considering the idea. Then we saw, waiting inside, some of the Mark Warner nannies. They had been up most of the night but had still turned up to work that day. They were intelligent, thoughtful young women and we liked and trusted them. The dance show was cancelled, but they wanted to put on a normal day for the children. Our daughter ran inside and started painting. Then, behind us, another set of parents arrived looking equally washed out. Then another, and another. We decided, in the end, to leave them for two hours. We put their bags on the pegs and saw the one labelled "Madeleine". Heads bent, we walked away, into the guilty glare of the morning sun.

Locals and holidaymakers had started circulating photocopied pictures of Madeleine, while others continued searching the beaches and village apartments. People were talking about what had happened or sat silently, staring blankly. We didn't see any police.

Later, there was a knock on our apartment door and we let the two men in. One was a uniformed Portuguese policeman, the other his translator. The translator had a squint and sweated slightly. He was breathless, perhaps a little excited. We later found out he was Robert Murat. He reminded me of a boy in my class at school who was bullied.

Through Murat we answered a few questions and gave our details, which the policeman wrote down on the back of a bit of paper. No notebook. Then he pointed to the photocopied picture of Madeleine on the table. "Is this your daughter?" he asked. "Er, no," we said. "That's the girl you are meant to be searching for." My heart sank for the McCanns.

As the day drew on, the media and more police arrived and we watched from our balcony as reporters practised their pieces to camera outside the McCanns' apartment. We then went back inside and watched them on the news.

We had to duck under the police tape with the pushchair to buy a pint of milk. We would roll past sniffer dogs, local police, then national police, local journalists, and then international journalists, TV reporters and satellite vans. A hundred pairs of eyes and a dozen cameras silently swivelled as we turned down the bend. We pretended, for the children's sake, that this was nothing unusual. Later on, our daughter saw herself with Daddy on TV. That afternoon we sat by the members-only pool, watching the helicopters watching us. We didn't know what else to do.

Saturday came, our last day. While we waited for the airport coach to pick us up, we gathered round the toddler pool by Tapas, making small talk in front of the children. I watched my baby son and daughter closely, shamefully grateful that I could.

We had not seen the McCanns since Thursday, when suddenly they appeared by the pool. The surreal limbo of the past two days suddenly snapped back into painful, awful realtime. It was a shock: the physical transformation of these two human beings was sickening - I felt it as a physical blow. Kate's back and shoulders, her hands, her mouth had reshaped themselves in to the angular manifestation of a silent scream. I thought I might cry and turned so that she wouldn't see. Gerry was upright, his lips now drawn into a thin, impenetrable line. Some people, including Jes, tried to offer comfort. Some gave them hugs. Some stared at their feet, words eluding them. We all wondered what to do. That was the last time we saw Gerry and Kate.

The rest of us left Praia da Luz together, an isolated Mark Warner group. The coach, the airport, the plane passed quietly. There were no other passengers except us. We arrived at Gatwick in the small hours of an early May morning. No jokes, no banter, just goodbye. Though we did not know it then, those few days in May were going to dominate the rest of our year.

"Did you have a good trip?" asked the cabbie at Gatwick, instantly underlining the conversational dilemma that would occupy the first few weeks: Do we say "Yes, thanks" and move swiftly on? Or divulge the "yes-but-no-but" truth of our "Maddy" experience? Everybody talks about holidays, they make good conversational currency at work, at the hairdresser's, in the playground. Everybody asked about ours. I would pause and take a breath, deciding whether there was enough time for what was to follow. People were genuinely horrified by what had happened to Madeleine and even by what we had been through (though we thought ourselves fortunate). Their humanity was a balm and a comfort to us; we needed to talk about it, chew it over and share it out, to make it a little easier to swallow.

The British police came round shortly after our return. Jes was pleased to give them a statement. The Portuguese police had never asked.

As the summer months rolled by, we thought the story would slowly and sadly ebb away, but instead it flourished and multiplied, and it became almost impossible to talk about any-thing else. Friends came for dinner and we would actively try to steer the conversation on to a different subject, always to return to Madeleine. Others solicited our thoughts by text message after any major twist or turn in the case. Acquaintances discussed us in the context of Madeleine, calling in the middle of their debates to clarify details.

I found some immunity in a strange, guilty happiness. We had returned unscathed to our humdrum family routine, my life was wonderful, my world was safe, I was lucky, I was blessed. The colours in the park were acute and hyper-real and the sun warmed my face.

At the end of June, the first cloud appeared. A Portuguese journalist called Jes's mobile (he had left his number with the Portuguese police). The journalist, who was writing for a magazine called Sol, called Jes incessantly. We both work in television and cannot claim to be green about the media, but this was a new experience. Jes learned this the hard way. Torn between politeness and wanting to get the journalist off the line without actually saying anything, he had to put the phone down, but he had already said too much. Her article pitched the recollections of "Jeremy Wilkins, television producer" against those of the "Tapas Nine", the group of friends, including the McCanns, whom we had nicknamed the Doctors. The piece was published at the end of June. Throughout July, Sol's testimony meant Jes became incorporated into all the Madeleine chronologies. More clouds began to gather - this time above our house.

In August, the doorbell rang. The man was from the Daily Mail. He asked if Jes was in (he wasn't). After he left I spent an anxious evening analysing what I had said, weighing up the possible consequences. The Sol article had brought the Daily Mail; what would happen next? Two days later, the Mail came for Jes again. This time they had computer printout pictures of a bald, heavy-set man seen lurking in some Praia da Luz holiday snaps. The chatroom implication was that the man was Madeleine's abductor. There was talk on the web, the reporter insinuated, that this man might be Jes. I laughed at the ridiculousness of it all and then realised he was serious. I looked at the pictures, and it wasn't Jes.

Once, Jes's father looked him up on the internet and found that "Jeremy Wilkins, television producer" was referenced on Google more than 70,000 times. There was talk that he was a "lookout" for Gerry and Kate; there was talk that Jes was orchestrating a reality-TV hoax and Madeleine's disappearance was part of the con; there was talk that the Tapas Nine were all swingers. There was a lot of talk.

In early September, Kate and Gerry became official suspects. Their warm tide of support turned decidedly cool. Had they cruelly conned us all? The public needed to know, and who had seen Gerry at around 9pm on the fateful night? Jes.

Tonight with Trevor McDonald, GMTV, the Sun, the News of the World, the Sunday Mirror, the Daily Express, the Evening Standard and the Independent on Sunday began calling. Jes's office stopped putting through calls from people asking to speak to "Jeremy" (only his grandmother calls him that). Some emails told him that he would be "better off" if he spoke to them or he would "regret it" if he didn't, implying that it was in his interest to defend himself - they didn't say what from.

Quietly, we began to worry that Jes might be next in line for some imagined blame or accusation. On a Saturday night in September, he received a call: we were on the front page of the News of the World. They had surreptitiously taken photographs of us, outside the house. There were no more details. We went to bed, but we could not sleep. "Maddie: the secret witness," said the headline, "TV boss holds vital clue to the mystery." Unfortunately, Jes does not hold any such vital clues. In November, he inched through the events of that May night with Leicestershire detectives, but he saw nothing suspicious, nothing that would further the investigation.

Throughout all this, I have always believed that Gerry and Kate McCann are innocent. When they were made suspects, when they were booed at, when one woman told me she was "glad" they had "done it" because it meant that her child was safe, I began to write this article - because I was there, and I believe that woman is wrong. There were no drug-fuelled "swingers" on our holiday; instead, there was a bunch of ordinary parents wearing Berghaus and worrying about sleep patterns. Secure in our banality, none of us imagined we were being watched. One group made a disastrous decision; Madeleine was vulnerable and was chosen. But in the face of such desperate audacity, it could have been any one of us.

And when I stroke my daughter's hair, or feel her butterfly lips on my cheek, I do so in the knowledge of what might have been. But our experience is nothing, an irrelevance, next to the McCanns' unimaginable grief. Their lives will always be touched by this darkness, while the true culprit may never be brought to light.

So my heart goes out to them, Gerry and Kate, the couple we remember from our Portuguese holiday. They had a beautiful daughter, Madeleine, who played and danced with ours at the kiddie club. That's who we remember.

© Bridget O'Donnell 2007.

· Bridget O'Donnell is a writer and director. The fee from this article will be donated to the Find Madeleine fund (findmadeleine.com).
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 09:41:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4243 on: July 06, 2019, 09:44:AM »
Praia de Luz is not really a holiday destination for parents with young children of Madeleine McCanns age, and toddlers.

More of a resort where couples go to, searching for the sun, a nice beach, blue sea, restaurants and a bar or two, were they can enjoy a romantic meal, over a bottle of wine, and meet other couples, make new friends, chat and laugh, make new memories, etc...
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 09:46:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #4244 on: July 06, 2019, 09:52:AM »
The trip to Portugal was no ordinary holiday, the group of nine adults and their children, were taking part in an international undercover operation, designed to trap gangs of peadophiles who were known to be operating in regions of the algarve. The adult members were using their young children as bait, intending to draw out sex offenders who lived and or operated in the Park de Luz region. I shall refer to this operation by the code name "Zenith"...
« Last Edit: July 06, 2019, 09:53:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...