Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891200 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3555 on: February 07, 2019, 07:18:PM »
The 'BAYGON' Link relating to Jane Tanner's sighting of TANNERMAN, and the presence of an empty tube of  'BAYGON' insecticide inside the derelict building close to the shallow grave in a hollow of the back garden, has significance in the alleged disappearance of Maddie McCann at the hands of an abductor, where no abductor existed at all...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3556 on: February 07, 2019, 07:30:PM »
The McCanns and their group have sought to promote the idea that Maddie was abducted - she wasn't..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3557 on: February 07, 2019, 07:47:PM »
The McCanns promoted the idea that Maddie was still alive on 3rd May 2007, which allows them to promote the idea that their daughter has been abducted..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3558 on: February 07, 2019, 07:49:PM »
The McCanns promoted the idea that Maddie was still alive on 3rd May 2007, which allows them to promote the idea that their daughter has been abducted..

Why have the crèche logs covering 1st, 2nd and 3rd May 2007 all got contradictions recorded in them?
« Last Edit: February 07, 2019, 07:50:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3559 on: February 08, 2019, 03:06:AM »
The McCann parents are hiding behind the general public dissatisfaction that they left their children alone and that this resulted in Maddie being taken - they have chosen to substitute the real meaning in this case, of the usage of the word 'TAKEN'...

The reality in my opinion is that Maddie McCanns life was taken, not that she was taken by any abductor sometime between 9pm be 10pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007 - unless of course, you choose to ignore the fact as to whether or not that at the time Maddie McCann left apartment 5A for the very last time, on the last occasion, she was alive, or dead?

If you choose to believe she was alive at the time she left apartment 5A for the very last time, then reference to her being 'TAKEN' could mean that she was either abducted, or escorted out of the apartment by some prior arrangement, whereby several members of the tapas nine group had knowledge of such an arrangement! But if so, what could possibly be meant by the term 'knowlege of such an arrangenent'? Could Maddie have been sold on by the parents or one or other of their holiday group to child traffickers?

If Maddie was dead by the time she left apartment 5A for the very last time, you have to ask yourselves whether or not, and who would take the corpse of a dead child out of the apartment at such a critical moment in time, during a one hour period sandwiched between two visits to check on Maddie and the other two children by her parents?

Nobody would have taken the body of a dead child out of their bed, and arrange to do it at such a critical period during that alleged evenings activities, other than if it was dangerous to leave a dead child's body in that bed, or as the case may be in a cupboard in the parents bedroom, or from its hiding place behind the sofa and it be subject to examination during autopsy, at which time the actual cause of death would be discovered, as well as any other injuries the childs body may show evidence of...

If you are the parent, or if you are one or other of the tapas nine group who was / is responsible for Maddie's death, or they knew that 'other thing's had been happening to Maddie in her living years, which might come to light, then they or them, or he or she, would not want the body to be found inside the apartment and be subject of intense examination medically or criminally by the police - the only option to those who might have been involved or responsible in some way for Maddie's demise, would be to get rid of the body, to remove it from the apartment..

Alive, or dead, it's truly bizarre that any would be party involved in 'the taking' of Maddie's body from apartment 5A, occurring at such a convenient time sandwiched in between the two checks made by the parents, Gerry's check at 9pm, and Kate's check at 10pm..
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 03:13:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3560 on: February 08, 2019, 03:36:AM »

Alive, or dead, it's truly bizarre that any would be party involved in 'the taking' of Maddie's body from apartment 5A, occurring at such a convenient time sandwiched in between the two checks made by the parents, Gerry's check at 9pm, and Kate's check at 10pm..

The narratives of Jane Tanner and Gerry McCann don't match concerning them being outside in the street adjacent to apartment 5A, at the same time that the would be abductor (TANNERMAN) was walking across the junction at the top of the same street supposedly carrying Maddie off..
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 03:37:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3561 on: February 08, 2019, 03:41:AM »
The narratives of Jane Tanner and Gerry McCann don't match concerning them being outside in the street adjacent to apartment 5A, at the same time that the would be abductor (TANNERMAN) was walking across the junction at the top of the same street supposedly carrying Maddie off..

How utterly convenient, that Jane Tanner's account about seeing Gerry in the street, and TANNERMAN carrying a child in his arms, should fall or occur so conveniently in with the accounts given by Oldfield and O'Brien to the fact that when they had supposedly carried out the check of the McCann siblings, that they had not physically seen any of the children in their beds?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3562 on: February 08, 2019, 03:58:AM »
It would be another 30 minutes of so (10pm) before Kate McCann would inadvertently return back to the tapas bar restaurant and to all and sundry who were present raise the alarm that ' they've taken her, they've taken her, Maddie is gone'..!

Rather coincidental is the fact that evening meal had been consumed by the parents and their friends before the alert was raised...

Another strange feature concerns the claim that a child belonging to Tanner / O'Brien was sick and bedridden back at their own apartment, which caused one or other adult to take it in turns at staying with the child and attending the tapas bar restaurant. Therefore when O'Brien was babysitting the sick child in the apartment, Jane Tanner was at the tapas bar restaurant enjoying drinks and her meal. She would leave the tapas bar and go back to their apartment and relieve O'Brien of his duty so that he could go to the tapas bar restaurant to be fed...

So, there was this fluctuation of Tanner and O'Brien, back and forth between their apartment and the restaurant! At no stage could Tanner and O'Brien have been together at the tapas bar and restuarant. However, both could have been together back in the vicinity of their apartment during the critical period between the checks of their own children by the McCann parents!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3563 on: February 08, 2019, 04:03:AM »
Tanner had to leave the tapas bar to go back to their apartment, and O'Brien had to leave the apartment to go to the tapas bar restaurant, and vice versa!

Where was Russell O'Brien prior to Jane Tanner claiming that she saw Gerry McCann and TANNERMAN in the street outside apartment 5A?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3564 on: February 08, 2019, 04:04:AM »
Tanner had to leave the tapas bar to go back to their apartment, and O'Brien had to leave the apartment to go to the tapas bar restaurant, and vice versa!

Where was Russell O'Brien prior to Jane Tanner claiming that she saw Gerry McCann and TANNERMAN in the street outside apartment 5A?

Which apartment was he at, or in?

His own, or the McCanns?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3565 on: February 08, 2019, 04:14:AM »
How soon after Jane Tanner arrived back at her apartment after seeing Gerry and TANNERMAN did O'Brien leave to go to the tapas restaurant?

Since, on Jane Tanner's own account Gerry was not present at the tapas bar when she left to go and relieve O'Brien of his duties, and no time has been given for the arrival of O'Brien at the restaurant? According to Gerry McCanns account he wasn't standing on the same side of the road talking with Jess Wilkes as given in Tanner's account, and he did not even see Tanner at all in the street on that occasion!

Why didn't McCann see Jane Tanner in the street on the occasion that he was there?

Did O'Brien get to the tapas bar restaurant before or after Gerry McCann?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3566 on: February 08, 2019, 04:22:AM »
Did O'Brien get to the tapas bar restaurant before or after Gerry McCann?

Either, Gerry McCann arrived back at the tapas bar restaurant before O'Brien did, or vice versa..

If McCann returned to the tapas bar before O'Brien, why would O'Brien be volunteering to check on the McCann siblings by 9.30pm only Minutes after arriving there himself? On the other hand, if O'Brien got to the tapas bar before McCann, why would Gerry McCann agree to O'Brien and Oldfield doing a check of the McCann Siblings,  when he had only just come from there himself?
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 04:24:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3567 on: February 08, 2019, 04:30:AM »
How long did Jane Tanner remain at her own apartment once O'Brien went to get his meal?

After his meal, and the fact that he supposedly volunteered to check the McCanns apartment at 9.30pm, he supposedly eventually arrived at his own apartment - how long were Jane Tanner and O'Brien together back in their own apartment, before Jane Tanner herself left to go back to the tapas bar restaurant?

If she went back to the tapas bar, what time did she arrive there after the check that O'Brien had made at 9.30pm?

Did she ever return at all to the tapas bar that evening?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3568 on: February 08, 2019, 06:48:AM »
At the time Kate McCann went to do her 10pm check - were both Jane Tanner and Russell O'Brien not at the tapas bar?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3569 on: February 08, 2019, 06:53:AM »
Was the man seen carrying the child by the Smith contingent heading down in the direction of the coast, in fact Russell O'Brien who had not returned to either the tapas bar, or his own apartment, but who had 'taken' Maddie's body out of apartment 5A? Does this explain why Jane Tanner never returned to the tapas bar after the supposed 9.30pm check of the McCann siblings by Oldfield and O'Brien?
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 07:35:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...