Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891419 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2625 on: April 24, 2016, 08:53:PM »
 British " trolls " paid £50,000 to help Amaral win his libel case against the Mcanns.( Todays Mail )

No prizes for guessing who instigated that !!

John

  • Guest
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2626 on: April 24, 2016, 08:55:PM »
British " trolls " paid £50,000 to help Amaral win his libel case against the Mcanns.( Todays Mail )

No prizes for guessing who instigated that !!

I agree, sour grapes eh lookout?     
« Last Edit: April 24, 2016, 08:56:PM by John »

John

  • Guest
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2627 on: April 24, 2016, 08:57:PM »
I am as certain as I can be that Maddie is dead, and her remains are buried where I said in a shallow grave inside the grounds of the derelict building across the street from the church. Sooner or later, somebody will go there and recover her remains. The photographs I took pinpoint exactly where her remains will be found. The photograph I took in the ' pink room' of the derelict building which produced the so called 'ghost of Maddie' apparition enhances the feelings I have got about that desolate place...

And you came by this astounding revelation why exactly?

John

  • Guest
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2628 on: April 24, 2016, 08:59:PM »
If it gets that far

Exactly.  The Supreme Court is concerned with interpretation of the Law, it isn't interested in petty squabbles between warring parties.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2629 on: April 24, 2016, 09:27:PM »
I agree, sour grapes eh lookout?   






Absolutely sick,John.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2630 on: April 27, 2016, 05:40:PM »
. . . her remains are buried where I said in a shallow grave . . .
If her remains are found there, is there anything other than "feelings" to link Gerry, Kate or anyone they know with that property?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2631 on: April 29, 2016, 11:04:AM »
Why,after 9 years,do British police admit that they know/knew the robbers who were involved with the disappearance of Madeleine during a bungled robbery ?
The said robber/s are now refusing questioning, after having already been questioned after the child's disappearance,as well as Portuguese police who also refuse to assist in the matter.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2632 on: April 29, 2016, 11:21:AM »
Why,after 9 years,do British police admit that they know/knew the robbers who were involved with the disappearance of Madeleine during a bungled robbery ?
The said robber/s are now refusing questioning, after having already been questioned after the child's disappearance,as well as Portuguese police who also refuse to assist in the matter.

'It's a Cop out'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2633 on: April 29, 2016, 11:27:AM »
Me, and my dog' 'Mist', could have carried out a 'better investigation', 'free of charge'. UK cops are basically, 'Useless'...

Why don't they 'listen to what I have been saying' for the last 9 years, or so...

Mad's body was present inside that 'derelict building' opposite the church, at Pria de Luz. She was killed, hence why 'my Camera captured her image' during my visit to the 'algarve', more than half a decade, ago..

When the 'shit hits the fan', don't forget you heard the truth here on 'this' forum, before 'anywhere else', including 'Cop files'...

Why hasn't anybody 'gone to this location', and 'dug up the shallow grave', which 'I have identified', pictorially?

« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 11:37:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2634 on: April 29, 2016, 06:23:PM »
Why,after 9 years,do British police admit that they know/knew the robbers who were involved with the disappearance of Madeleine during a bungled robbery ?
The said robber/s are now refusing questioning, after having already been questioned after the child's disappearance,as well as Portuguese police who also refuse to assist in the matter.
Hi lookout don't you think burglars usually just go for the quick pickings of money, jewellery, etc and wouldn't get involved with a kidnap? There's a good article on the background and developments on the case here:  http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/madeleine-mccann-latest-are-police-any-closer-to-knowing-the-truth/ar-BBsqnsO

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2635 on: April 29, 2016, 07:21:PM »
 I've just read that,Steve and it's much the same that has been reported over the years with little or no advance made regarding the investigation. I can't blame the McCanns for not giving up though. I've thought the same as Kate that Madeleine is still alive and for that reason alone I'd never give up the search. 

John

  • Guest
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2636 on: April 29, 2016, 10:23:PM »
I've just read that,Steve and it's much the same that has been reported over the years with little or no advance made regarding the investigation. I can't blame the McCanns for not giving up though. I've thought the same as Kate that Madeleine is still alive and for that reason alone I'd never give up the search.

Madeleine probably got out and met with an accident.  There never was any abduction.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 10:41:PM by John »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2637 on: April 30, 2016, 11:20:AM »
Madeleine probably got out and met with an accident.  There never was any abduction.





That was my very first thought until other issues came into play. Such as the heavy shutters being open and a shoe-print beneath the window. Suspicious characters hanging around the area. Staff at the Tapas bar knowing the arrival/departure times of the party. Money changing hands between police.
Many many other things which aroused suspicion.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2638 on: April 30, 2016, 11:22:AM »
Even if the child had wandered out,someone would have picked her up so whichever way you look at this,it was an abduction.

Offline marty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 463
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2639 on: May 01, 2016, 10:04:AM »
Madeleine probably got out and met with an accident.  There never was any abduction.

For me,there's no doubt no abduction took place. What I would like to know is, why start off by lying through your teeth.