Author Topic: new member  (Read 40294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
new member
« on: January 13, 2013, 08:16:PM »
My name is Michaela. I saw a link to this forum on a tweet a while ago and have been reading about Jeremy Bamber's case and some of the other cases. I have known about several of the cases on this site for some time.

I believe there is something very wrong with the Bamber conviction and I look forward to finding out more.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2013, 08:20:PM »
Welcome!  :)

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: new member
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2013, 08:25:PM »
welcome to the forum :) 

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2013, 08:49:AM »
Welcome to the forum  Michaela.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: new member
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2013, 08:51:AM »
Welcome Michaela :)

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2013, 09:15:AM »
Michaela You say that you joined the forum because you think there was something wrong with Jeremy Bamber's conviction. Yet I have only seen you post in the Simon Hall thread so far. What is it abouit the conviction of Bamber hat you find so wrong?

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: new member
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2013, 11:40:AM »
Lugg

The case against Jeremy Bamber in my opinion is about innuendo, gossip and lots of lies.

The forensic evidence also leaves a lot to be desired. Its actually pretty amazing that there is no scientific evidence that links Jeremy to this "crime" yet this was a bloody and brutal set of murders.

I was actually reading info about the case this morning, and I noticed that there had been bloody fingerprints on the bible Sheila had beside her, yet the police never explained whose prints they were. I find that very odd, and I am of the belief also that they are indeed Sheila's

There are far too many questions in this case and nothing I am reading so far sits very comfortably with me.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: new member
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2013, 11:43:AM »
Do you know how many times you have asked the same question?

What drives you?

Mrs Hall  I am not getting into a debate with you since the moderators have locked the topic of Simon Hall.

I will answer your question, even though you failed to answer mine.

The truth drives me, and I do not think you are telling the truth about the blogs you say Simon Hall wrote.



Lugg

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2013, 11:43:AM »
Lugg

The case against Jeremy Bamber in my opinion is about innuendo, gossip and lots of lies.

The forensic evidence also leaves a lot to be desired. Its actually pretty amazing that there is no scientific evidence that links Jeremy to this "crime" yet this was a bloody and brutal set of murders.

I was actually reading info about the case this morning, and I noticed that there had been bloody fingerprints on the bible Sheila had beside her, yet the police never explained whose prints they were. I find that very odd, and I am of the belief also that they are indeed Sheila's

There are far too many questions in this case and nothing I am reading so far sits very comfortably with me.
Thank you Michaela.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: new member
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2013, 11:56:AM »
Can someone please ban this apparent troll....

you want me banned because  I asked a question you cannot answer, and I have an opinion?


Lugg

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2013, 12:02:PM »
you want me banned because  I asked a question you cannot answer, and I have an opinion?
Oh no! we're off again. Please both of you ladies please try and not be too confrontational towards each other. :)

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: new member
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2013, 12:28:PM »
Oh no! we're off again. Please both of you ladies please try and not be too confrontational towards each other. :)



I have already stated that I would not get into a debate since the topic was closed.


Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2013, 01:05:AM »
Lugg

The case against Jeremy Bamber in my opinion is about innuendo, gossip and lots of lies.

The forensic evidence also leaves a lot to be desired. Its actually pretty amazing that there is no scientific evidence that links Jeremy to this "crime" yet this was a bloody and brutal set of murders.

I was actually reading info about the case this morning, and I noticed that there had been bloody fingerprints on the bible Sheila had beside her, yet the police never explained whose prints they were. I find that very odd, and I am of the belief also that they are indeed Sheila's

There are far too many questions in this case and nothing I am reading so far sits very comfortably with me.

Welcome Michaela!!

The prints on the bible are intriguing aren't they? If they were Jeremy Bambers, EP would have made much of it so quite evidently, they aren't his!!


Lugg

  • Guest
Re: new member
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2013, 01:22:AM »
Welcome Michaela!!

The prints on the bible are intriguing aren't they? If they were Jeremy Bambers, EP would have made much of it so quite evidently, they aren't his!!
Good point Caroline.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: new member
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2013, 02:33:PM »
Welcome Michaela!!

The prints on the bible are intriguing aren't they? If they were Jeremy Bambers, EP would have made much of it so quite evidently, they aren't his!!

They are very intriguing and so are the bible passages too.

Did they ever say who the prints belonged too?
Clearly they are not Jeremy Bamber's or as you say they would have said that was proof enough for a conviction.