"To answer Vic's doubt of my honesty in suggesting that I wasn't there at the beginning when Bamber was found guilty. And that I didn't know any of the family. (1) I most definitely WAS at the beginning. Because I tried to get hold of a transcript of the trial just after the verdict, but couldn't. The reason was because there certainly seemed something really unjust about the verdict. (2) The answer to this one is NO I did not and do not know any of the family personally and I have never said I did. In fact I even said so at times in the past posts. What I did say however is that I knew many locals from that area and have done work for various farmers and knew those farmers who knew the family. For this it was of course implied that I was lying. Do you see how it works. By adding something that I never said and then suggesting that I am a liar for saying what I never said, I am shown up before the forum as a liar. Very smart move isn't it?"
I DIdnt question your honesty Grahame! I was just defending your point saying that I wasn't around at the time! And that I think that's a poor argument as virtually none of us were!
I thought everyone was getting along very well until you accused the relatives of stealing from Bamber over the caravan park to which I objected and I believe with every justification. I have a great relationship with many innocent posters and have never knowingly insulted anyone.
I called the site bamberbollocks.com (the old site) because it was the most error strewn website I've ever seen. With wrong times, dates, even a pro-bamber supporter would have difficulty recognising the arguments. I had a number of pro bamber supporters pm me, saying it made them laugh, so it wasn't THAT insulting!
I even set out that I don't believe you've got a bad bone in your body, which I meant as an olive branch, but you've continued to attack me along with Campion, who for the life of me I've never said a bad word about!
So, do we shake hands or not?
