If I recall correctly, these were accusations made by BW which Peter was never given the opportunity to answer, or at least if he did his answers have never been posted. The investigation went nowhere because, again IIRC, the executors did not feel he had done anything to the detriment of the estate, and commented that the business actually turned a larger profit under Peter than it had done under Neville.
In the documents that I read,in the second year,the company only made a profit of 3 hundred and something pounds?
I take your point that PE was never charged with anything,and therefore apologise.
Although,if BW's allegations were unfounded,does this not show that we cannot then really put much credence as to her testimony at Jeremy's trial?
