Example of how Relatives Names are Blackened.

[Jane]

  A few days ago, Mr Vidvic asked me quite succinctly:-  'Do you think I am an idiot?'
  I have pondered his question, and am glad to confirm in the affirmative.
  Moreover in the alleged colourful verbage of Mr Jeremy Bamber, my considered opinion is:-  'He is a nutter'.
  PS, - Meddlesome Mat, this opinion is non-negotiatable.

Good Morning, dear Campion. Much as it distresses me to leave you, I'm spending the day in London. I will look forward to joining you when I return.

[lookout]

Do u wonder why?!

Irrespective of your own or mine or any other poster's individual beliefs, JB is currently convicted of the appalling murder of 5 members of his family, including shooting dead 2 children whilst they slept.

Regardless of whether there is any evidence or the evidence is sufficiently strong enough, does the fact that he has been found guilty by a court of law and all subsequent appeals have failed, not make you appreciate why he is viewed and treated so badly.

IF he is guilty then he deserves to be treated appallingly and then some. What he has been convicted of doing is absolutely horrific. To be honest i'm surprised he has not been treated and viewed far worse by those convinced of his guilt.

IF he is guily then he is one of the most abhorent criminals in English legal history.

Having been found guilty doesn't mean a thing,neither does it prove that he was guilty.
Michael George was found guilty.
Stephan Kischkow was found guilty.
Colin Stagg was found guilty.
Susan May was found guilty.
Eddie Gilfoyle was found guilty.
Amanda Knox was found guilty.
Sion Jenkins was found guilty.

So it goes on. Now tell me the full definition of a guilty verdict,outlining all the results from the investigation,disregarding the " who said/did what " brigade. It was a matter for the police and the police only.

BTW,I don't have tunnel vision,,I don't need followers as I'm not a sheep,,have a mind of my own,never listen to gossip or hearsay, and always follow what I think is right and proper,without being prompted by those wearing blinkers.

[lookout]

A person HAS to be mental to shoot/murder in such a way,,and there is/was NO proof that Jeremy was/is mental.

[susan]

Morning april you little minx with your sights set on my campion be gone you devilwomen   Have a lovely day in London but will miss you.

[susan]

Morning lookout  how you today.  I agree anyone who can shoot two wee children whilst sleeping at close range with a rifle has to be very mentally disturbed.  

[vidvic]

  A few days ago, Mr Vidvic asked me quite succinctly:-  'Do you think I am an idiot?'
  I have pondered his question, and am glad to confirm in the affirmative.
  Moreover in the alleged colourful verbage of Mr Jeremy Bamber, my considered opinion is:-  'He is a nutter'.
  PS, - Meddlesome Mat, this opinion is non-negotiatable.

Vidvic didn't ask you anything and never shall. What an incredibly rude individual you are.

[lookout]

Morning lookout  how you today.  I agree anyone who can shoot two wee children whilst sleeping at close range with a rifle has to be very mentally disturbed.

Hi Susan,,another worse example of mental illness is the tragedy in the States where an unbalanced individual has shot 20 children. How on earth he was able to acquire such a weapon,I don't know.

[susan]

Hi lookout I was hearing that on the news and I ask myself what is going on in the minds of people who at random kill innocent children.  He must have had a grudge against the school or some of the parents.When I hear about gang related killings I can understand this more although I do not condone murder for whatever reason.,  I ask myself at times like this where is my God

[lookout]

Vidvic didn't ask you anything and never shall. What an incredibly rude individual you are.

Blimey,,that's rich coming from you. Just sayin'.

[campion]

  I Have A Personal Maxim :- 'I don't talk to Idiots'.

[tyler]

These documents show nothing of the sort! Where is your proof? Where is the decision? The verdict? Anyone can launch a case, I could accuse you of all sorts and we'd go to court, and have a decision, a verdict?....

So, your husband is happy to enjoy Peter's friendly hospitality whilst you anonymously on the internet accuse him of being a thief?!

I can read Vidvic!
And I think that you will find that it was Barbara Wilson that accused PE of being a thief! And clearly the Pargeters too....it is contained in the court documents.As to the decision of the court case,well Hartley has previously told the forum that the Pargeters won the case!
So,it is not me that it is making unfounded accusations!
As to your comments regarding my husband.........how Victorian! You're saying that I should think as my husband thinks? Sorry,but I am my own person! My husband was not on the Eaton's pay role,and took absolutely nothing from them!

[Lugg]

Lugg...you beat me to it! No disrepect to steve but what a ridiculous statement to make!How could Jeremy possibly sue anyone whilst behind bars and having no funds? Perhaps Steve should think about the implications should JB ever be freed an innocent man? Owing to his many slanderous posts,he might just find himself a target of a libel case from JB!

I think there will be too many of them to sue. :D Anyway if JB was freed and proven an innocent man I think he would be too joyful to spend the rest of his life sueing people. I also think that the relatives will have nothing to fear from this man as I don't think he has murder on his mind.
What I would like to see from a Christian standpoint is for the Holy Spirit to convict him of his sins and for him to believe on Christ as his Saviour and publicly confess this. And then tell us that he is innocent of these despicable crimes with a clean conscience. No true Christian can fight his own conscience.

[Lugg]

Good Morning, dear Campion. Much as it distresses me to leave you, I'm spending the day in London. I will look forward to joining you when I return.

Lundinium? I do not envy you at this time of year April.

[tyler]

By the way,I dont make posts that are unfounded.I comment and debate on the things I have read,court documents,statements etc.
Im getting a bit tired of you asking people "Where is your proof"? Many of us can source the information which we debate.
I would like to ask you - Where is YOUR proof?
Not very much of what you say is backed up by proof.Your opening post on this thread for example!
Just yesterday you made an unfounded allegation toward Jeremy,accusing him of giving out misinformation regarding Basil Cocks statement and the fingerprinting dust? Patti posted the evidence which proved you wrong,but there was no admission from you that you had been wrong.....and no apology towards Jeremy.
Why don't you try to practice what you preach!

[Lugg]

By the way,I dont make posts that are unfounded.I comment and debate on the things I have read,court documents,statements etc.
Im getting a bit tired of you asking people "Where is your proof"? Many of us can source the information which we debate.
I would like to ask you - Where is YOUR proof?
Not very much of what you say is backed up by proof.Your opening post on this thread for example!
Just yesterday you made an unfounded allegation toward Jeremy,accusing him of giving out misinformation regarding Basil Cocks statement and the fingerprinting dust? Patti posted the evidence which proved you wrong,but there was no admission from you that you had been wrong.....and no apology towards Jeremy.
Why don't you try to practice what you preach!

A good observation Tyler.