Author Topic: Would it make a difference if silencer was fitted on gun barrel during shootings  (Read 12380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi nugnug  I would not think in law they would be allowed to claim anything it would be the next in line in Jeremy's family but if we have any legal minds on the forum today they will be having a good laugh at our legal knowledge :) :) :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i would of thought they might be able to if there was nobody else alive.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi april  just had a thought.  Jeremy was not allowed to inherit because he was sent to prison for murdering his family therefore his next of kin would be Ralph his would have been June and June's would have been her sister. Do you think I should study law :) :) :)

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
No nugs they would have traced distant relatives of Jeremy's on the side of his adopted parents.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
so if colin was entitled to a share how come he never got one.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
nugs  vidvic posted up a few posts back that the twins did not inherit something to do with their age so Colin would not inherit anything. Everything passed to June then in turn to her sister.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
are so colin wasn't entitled to inhirete i thought so.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
nugs that is right Colin was not entitled to inherit.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Hi april  just had a thought.  Jeremy was not allowed to inherit because he was sent to prison for murdering his family therefore his next of kin would be Ralph his would have been June and June's would have been her sister. Do you think I should study law :) :) :)
No nugs they would have traced distant relatives of Jeremy's on the side of his adopted parents.



Susan!!!!!! What a brain :D You are right on both points. If you fancy having a go at law, you go for it :) :) :)

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
i would of thought they might be able to if there was nobody else alive.



No, Nugg. Legally they are no longer seen as being related to Jeremy, neither, legally, is he related to them. The only way he could inherit from them is if June and Nevill gave permission for contact, otherwise they would not be entitled to know the child's new name.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi april  think I will stick to pole dancing much less complicated :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
nugs that is right Colin was not entitled to inherit.

but never let the facts get in the way of what you believe hey vidic.

guest154

  • Guest
Best post you've ever made mat. I couldn't put this any better than you have.

Thanks, vidvic.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
but never let the facts get in the way of what you believe hey vidic.

I explained that Colin wasn't entitled to anything and if you actually read my posts you'd see that. I have no idea what point you've tried to make and I'm not sure you do either!!
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
but never let the facts get in the way of what you believe hey vidic.

Nugnug is right about Colin ie he was not entitled to inherit as the twins died.  In this regard the order of deaths makes no difference.  The key point is the twins died before they inherited any part of the estate.  A beneficiary needs to be alive to inherit.

Once an adoption order is made in the eyes of the law it's as if the adopted child was born to its adoptive parents.  The birth parents have no entitlement whatsover and conversely the adopted child cannot make a claim against the estate(s) of  birth parents/family.

My understanding is that if Jeremy had not have been found guilty he would have been the sole beneficiary save a few bequests eg Jean Boutell 1k etc.

Need to have a look at the wills to determine exactly what's what really.  Do we have copies?  I will pm Mike.

Off to get my brows and lashes tinted to enhance my Celtic appearance and hopefully increase my pulling power over the festive period   :P