Author Topic: Appeal for new information  (Read 23629 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #165 on: December 08, 2012, 07:08:PM »
Hi Caroline  more scary for some than others :) :) :)

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #166 on: December 08, 2012, 07:56:PM »
I was joking about the tv. ;D I actually have a 32" LCD tv £200 from Tescos that me mam bought us. I was just talking about society in general and this comment was not aimed at anyone in particular. In the 50's when I was brought up and people generally had very little, it seemed people were actually more happy than they are today where we have lots of stuff and are much more well off.


I think the feeling of "We're all in it together" lasted until the 60s. Until then, it was a more or less level playing field. The availability of free higher education, whilst providing for a brighter future for many also became the reason for breakdown in communication in families.The jobs available because of higher education meant that local towns were no longer acceptable places of employment for the newly empowered who could command ever higher salaries and it seemed the more we had, the more we wanted. I suppose we were encouraged to be greedy. The days of putting money in appropriate tins to pay bills were long gone, instead we paid with plastic and if we ran shart we borrowed more because we were told we could. We weren't alone. Those who were voted in to look after our interests were doing the same as we were. The knowledge had been put aside that a bubble can only become so big before it bursts.

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #167 on: December 08, 2012, 08:46:PM »
I know what you mean Lugg but I guess every generation thinks 'the old days' were the best. I'm sure kids today will be saying the same thing in years to come when robots and hover-boards are the in thing  ;D
An archaeologist found written on an item found in a 3000 year old Egyption tomb. It said, "Childen today are extremely selfish and disobedient and they do not respect their parents any more".

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #168 on: December 08, 2012, 09:51:PM »
  My Dear Lugg,  In responce to your gem of archaeological acerbity, may I reminisce upon my late Mother's assertions on this premise.
  She was borne to a farming family, whose roots were traced back,(by her cousin, Geoff) to Domesday times. Grandfather, Thomas Hy. was then the senior member of the family, named after a largish town in Hertfordshire. The principal claim to fame, as related to me by Mum, via her Grandma, whose maiden name, incidentally, was Ainslie, was a previous grandmother by the name of Mrs Pratt.
  Now Mrs Pratt and her sister were dead ringers for Queen Victoria. Mum was told that Mrs Pratt  was Housekeeper to QV's household. I have mulled over the possibility, that after the 1st attempted assassination on QV's life, that Mrs Pratt and her sister were latterday Doppelgangers.
  The leather bound family album was bequeathed to me, and there is a great likeness to QV.
  A further little anecdote, related by Aunty Gladwys. She found it amusing that,in the list of members of the family, that one couple had 5 male and 4 female children, but they were all little boys.
  The solution was in the family bible- their name was Littleboys!
 
  Now here is the nitty gritty.  My Mum waited, at a  busstop near the farm, for 5 years, for the New Empress( later City) omnibus. to her work as a jeweller at sunny Southend. Her long wait was not, however in vain. Mum and Dad got married, despite the consternation of her family.

  What my Mum blamed the sickness in Postwar Society on, was what she termed the 'Latch Key Legacy, i.e Mum's not being at home, when their children returned from School.

 

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #169 on: December 09, 2012, 10:49:AM »
  My Dear Lugg,  In responce to your gem of archaeological acerbity, may I reminisce upon my late Mother's assertions on this premise.
  She was borne to a farming family, whose roots were traced back,(by her cousin, Geoff) to Domesday times. Grandfather, Thomas Hy. was then the senior member of the family, named after a largish town in Hertfordshire. The principal claim to fame, as related to me by Mum, via her Grandma, whose maiden name, incidentally, was Ainslie, was a previous grandmother by the name of Mrs Pratt.
  Now Mrs Pratt and her sister were dead ringers for Queen Victoria. Mum was told that Mrs Pratt  was Housekeeper to QV's household. I have mulled over the possibility, that after the 1st attempted assassination on QV's life, that Mrs Pratt and her sister were latterday Doppelgangers.
  The leather bound family album was bequeathed to me, and there is a great likeness to QV.
  A further little anecdote, related by Aunty Gladwys. She found it amusing that,in the list of members of the family, that one couple had 5 male and 4 female children, but they were all little boys.
  The solution was in the family bible- their name was Littleboys!
 
  Now here is the nitty gritty. My Mum waited, at a  busstop near the farm, for 5 years, for the New Empress( later City) omnibus. to her work as a jeweller at sunny Southend. Her long wait was not, however in vain. Mum and Dad got married, despite the consternation of her family.

  What my Mum blamed the sickness in Postwar Society on, was what she termed the 'Latch Key Legacy, i.e Mum's not being at home, when their children returned from School.
Another reason I hate public transport. ;D

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #170 on: December 09, 2012, 11:01:AM »
  Thankyou Lugg for your eloquent, and indeed erudite, observation!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #171 on: December 09, 2012, 11:22:AM »
Campion.........an interesting read re:Pargeter.  :)


http://poppymeze.blogspot.co.uk/2012_03_01_archive.html

I don't understand this comment ....

 “If it hadn’t [sic] been for Taff Jones directions we probably wouldn’t be here today.”  ???

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #172 on: December 09, 2012, 12:02:PM »
Good point Caroline, have a brownie badge.
  All I can  interpret from this, is that Taff Jones was directed 'Down Under', instead of going 'Upstairs'( i.e. Heaven), after his alleged mysterious fall off the ladder, in his bungalow.
  Whom, indeed, was the EP officer who went to the Antipodes, to investigate, at the behest of Uncle Bobbie, the alleged mideeds of JB there?
  (Tongue in cheek) !!   - Can, or will Steve uk help us with this enigma?

Offline haughton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #173 on: December 09, 2012, 02:01:PM »
  Does anyone know what Jeremy's next move could be ?

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #174 on: December 09, 2012, 02:07:PM »
Good point Caroline, have a brownie badge.
  All I can  interpret from this, is that Taff Jones was directed 'Down Under', instead of going 'Upstairs'( i.e. Heaven), after his alleged mysterious fall off the ladder, in his bungalow.
  Whom, indeed, was the EP officer who went to the Antipodes, to investigate, at the behest of Uncle Bobbie, the alleged mideeds of JB there?
  (Tongue in cheek) !!   - Can, or will Steve uk help us with this enigma?

The word 'directions' could mean anything but the author is getting at something - might have been helpful if he/she had said what they meant! :)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #175 on: December 09, 2012, 02:08:PM »
  Does anyone know what Jeremy's next move could be ?

Only a bowel movement at the moment,haughton,,,but keep watching.

Offline haughton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #176 on: December 09, 2012, 02:20:PM »
OK Lookout. I'll watch this space, but it seems to going on for ever. At this rate JB might wind -up completing his "whole life sentence" !!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #177 on: December 09, 2012, 02:26:PM »
OK Lookout. I'll watch this space, but it seems to going on for ever. At this rate JB might wind -up completing his "whole life sentence" !!

Weren't we discussing trying to enlist the interest of a high profile person? Someone who might be interested in reviewing the new evidence and making a docu? It may have been rejected but it might influence public opinion if they were to hear it in full. I have someone in mind but anyone else got any ideas? It doesn't matter if they agree with his innocence, as long as they are interested in the debate!

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6600
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #178 on: December 09, 2012, 02:37:PM »
  Does anyone know what Jeremy's next move could be ?

He will have to start again with fresh submissions to the CCRC.


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: Appeal for new information
« Reply #179 on: December 09, 2012, 02:39:PM »
Weren't we discussing trying to enlist the interest of a high profile person? Someone who might be interested in reviewing the new evidence and making a docu? It may have been rejected but it might influence public opinion if they were to hear it in full. I have someone in mind but anyone else got any ideas? It doesn't matter if they agree with his innocence, as long as they are interested in the debate!


Caroline, I've been in touch with someone who possibly "knows a man who can".