Author Topic: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?  (Read 3488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2012, 08:28:PM »
But my Lord. You must admit. He does LOOK like a murderer.
I bet the photographer was well chuffed to capture that shot.  You can do that with anyone if your lucky.  Notice how often it's used specially by people with an axe to grind.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2012, 09:18:PM »
If ever I saw the picture of a guilty man-it's him..http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/essex_killer_jeremy_bamber_makes_fresh_legal_bid_over_murder_conviction_1_1683861

In what way Steve? Please explain how you gauge guilt simply from that picture?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2012, 09:23:PM »
In what way Steve? Please explain how you gauge guilt simply from that picture?

Well it was supposed to be a throw-away satirical remark,yet it's curious that several members have perceived a similar sensation. To my mind he looks furtive and shifty as if he's got something to hide.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2012, 09:31:PM »
Well it was supposed to be a throw-away satirical remark,yet it's curious that several members have perceived a similar sensation. To my mind he looks furtive and shifty as if he's got something to hide.


Hey Steve,I bet you'd look like that too with a camera shoved in your face while you're concentrating on not banging your head getting in the car. Somebody could possibly have shouted out to him at that crucial time.

Then again,I don't think I'd have been over the moon at being convicted of something I didn't do. Nothing to smile about,let's face it.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2012, 09:32:PM »
Well it was supposed to be a throw-away satirical remark,yet it's curious that several members have perceived a similar sensation. To my mind he looks furtive and shifty as if he's got something to hide.

I don't think they have Steve, they are referring to the way the press manipulates such an impression by using pictures that weren't ... shall we say .... taken from our best side. You might look 'furtive' too if you were snapped unaware by journalist whilst handcuffed to a prison guard  on route to or from court.

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2012, 09:35:PM »
Well it was supposed to be a throw-away satirical remark,yet it's curious that several members have perceived a similar sensation. To my mind he looks furtive and shifty as if he's got something to hide.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2012, 09:37:PM »

Hey Steve,I bet you'd look like that too with a camera shoved in your face while you're concentrating on not banging your head getting in the car. Somebody could possibly have shouted out to him at that crucial time.

Then again,I don't think I'd have been over the moon at being convicted of something I didn't do. Nothing to smile about,let's face it.

The camera was 50 yards away and was the only picture anyone managed to get of him at the 2002 appeal, thats why it's used on both positive and negative stories. It was taken by a photographer called Stephen.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2012, 09:44:PM »
The camera was 50 yards away and was the only picture anyone managed to get of him at the 2002 appeal, thats why it's used on both positive and negative stories. It was taken by a photographer called Stephen.

Rather an unfair advantage though,being handcuffed and all.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2012, 09:45:PM »
Rather an unfair advantage though,being handcuffed and all.

err......that's because he's one of the country's most dangerous criminals.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2012, 09:49:PM »
  The photographer named Stephen, is that his christian or surname?

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #25 on: November 06, 2012, 09:56:PM »
  The photographer named Stephen, is that his christian or surname?

First name, campion, though it's pronounced stephaaan, but i can't find an e accute......lol
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #26 on: November 06, 2012, 10:21:PM »
A picture jeremy most likely thought would not be taken , but keeping in line with Britains vile press any photo is better than none.

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #27 on: November 06, 2012, 10:29:PM »
I'm a fan of Lombroso !!!!!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #28 on: November 06, 2012, 10:32:PM »
I'm a fan of Lombroso !!!!!

LOL - were his theory true, I have seen several people today who just must be criminals!

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's Judicial Review has Failed?
« Reply #29 on: November 06, 2012, 10:38:PM »
LOL - were his theory true, I have seen several people today who just must be criminals!
hi caroline
that's why i don't like mirrors  ;)