Of course. I also do not mean to be confrontational. But I don't think campion could give the extent of his knowledge in one paragraph. It would be the same as reading one paragraph of Shakespeare and then declaring that from the part that you read that Shakespeare was not a very good playwright. 
I also would not speak of the Freemasons as being wholly corrupt just because they are Masons. But I do not doubt that some Masons use their influence to their own ends. That is not to say that all Freemasons are like that. That would be silly.
I know nothing of this campion fellow to be honest, I do not know the extent of his knowledge regarding freemasonry. I only have what he has written in this thread to go on and to me it is very much baseline in terms of its complexities., many of you have already stated unintentionally i must say much that already contradicts what I feel he was trying to do here on this thread.
He replied to me as gordo 69 reffering to the judicial fraternities and police lodges mainly in America but also in other parts here in the Uk, he was trying to attempt to say that I am somehow trying to derail his attempts at attacking the order of freemasonry when all I am really doing is trying to do is put a different perspective to the order from the inside that may well help you all with this possible aspect of this case.
I can say without any doubt that freemasonry did nothing to continue or help further this man in any part he had to play within this case, unless of course you have proof and not some ramblings of someone who has obviously some form of variance to the order.
Patti I know nothing of the buffaloes except they appear to be big hairy beasts that probably tast quite good. They have nothing to do with freemasonry.
