Complaints made by Jeremy Bamber in 1990...

[lookout]

That reminds me when I was in the Brecon Beacons camping with a friend and we decided to go to Newport to see his girlfriend. As we went through Abergavenny I saw this boy with long hair dressed as Bob Dylan sitting on this post box playing a guitar. On the way back around 6 hours later there was this same lad sitting on the same post box still playing the guitar.

I bet his bum was sore,Lugg.

[Jane]

April 1, According to wikipedia " Dylan the Rabbit" is based on "Bob Dylan"

YESSSSSSSSSS

[Lugg]

I bet his bum was sore,Lugg.

The answer is blowing in the wind.

[susan]

Lugg you are a laugh a minute how can Boo think badly of you must have picked you up wrong.

[Roch]

Boo registers on here claiming 100% innocence.  Within 11 posts, Boo has turned almost 180 degrees, to near certainty of guilt, based on one of the three* pillars of the 'far right' guilty camp on the other forum.  Namely JM's statement.

*The other two pillars being Babs Wilson's "I should never turn my back on that young man" etc and Colin Caffell's book.

Do us all a favour Boo.  Go back to the drawing board for your next infiltration attempt.

[Roch]

Well done Roch!

I still don't understand why Patti appeared to be in support of BOO & felt the need to edit 'my post to Boo' as opposed dealing with the troll, as you have done!

Steph, I wasn't attempting to contradict Patti.  There's that many incursions on here, it's not possible for mods to both always call it right and please everyone in the process.  Patti is an excellent mod and I feel we are lucky to have her help on here.

[Roch]

David, I wasn't suggesting you were...  I think it's made worse to mod when posts are removed without consultation with other mods.. my opinion of course... I thought the removal of posts was only in extreme situations.. ? Why does Patti use her powers to suit her own agenda I wonder?

Anyway - glad you've managed to remove another troll, that's all I'm saying...

We are all entitled to an opinion... I feel lucky that there are some good honest posters on here... who don't feel the need to boast about this, like some... 

Steph, if Patti saw fit to intervene then she must have had good reason.  Let's not escalate this any further. 

[Roch]

We move on...

[Patti]

Hi Roch, maybe I can clear something up. Steph reported Boo. I edited Boo's post towards Lugg, I also edited Steph's post because it had Boo's quote on it too Lugg. 

[Roch]

Hi Roch, maybe I can clear something up. Steph reported Boo. I edited Boo's post towards Lugg, I also edited Steph's post because it had Boo's quote on it too Lugg. 

Fair & square Patti.  Speaking of quotes.  I've been doing a lot of bracket fixing lately.  In fact, I now regard my self as a time served bracket fixer 

[Martin]

Jeremy Bamber has not stopped complaining since 28 October 1986 when the white prison van arrived late at Chelmsford Crown Court and then sped off to take him to Wormwood Scrubs..

Steve_uk is on this forum to do a job. The obvious intention behind this stupid post is to distract attention from the matter under consideration, namely, the fact that Anthony Pargeter’s statement appears to support Jeremy’s claim that the silencer was handed back to the relatives before David Boutflour allegedly found it. 

From a statement by Anthony Pargeter.

“Sometime after the 10 August 1985, I received a telephone call from David Boutflour who is a cousin of mine. He told me the silencer had been returned to the family, presumably by the police. He said there was a large scratch on it, some red paint on the knurled end and what appeared to be blood. I advised David to return it to the police straight away.”

Bamber’s allegations.

1 That police officers returned the sound moderator to members of his family, where with police knowledge it was tampered with and then returned to the police, where evidence was found. (statement pages 2 - 5)

2 That collusion took place between police officers and witnesses to put paint on the silencer. (statement page 9)

…...

7 That collusion took place between police officers and David Boutflour in making a statement which contains false evidence.

[Lugg]

Steve_uk is on this forum to do a job. The obvious intention behind this stupid post is to distract attention from the matter under consideration, namely, the fact that Anthony Pargeter’s statement appears to support Jeremy’s claim that the silencer was handed back to the relatives before David Boutflour allegedly found it. 

From a statement by Anthony Pargeter.

“Sometime after the 10 August 1983, I received a telephone call from David Boutflour who is a cousin of mine. He told me the silencer had been returned to the family, presumably by the police. He said there was a large scratch on it, some red paint on the knurled end and what appeared to be blood. I advised David to return it to the police straight away.”

Bamber’s allegations.

1 That police officers returned the sound moderator to members of his family, where with police knowledge it was tampered with and then returned to the police, where evidence was found. (statement pages 2 - 5)

2 That collusion took place between police officers and witnesses to put paint on the silencer. (statement page 9)

…...

7 That collusion took place between police officers and David Boutflour in making a statement which contains false evidence.

Even a diagnosed nutcase can see that this silencer "so called evidence" should have been thrown out of court. It's a joke it really is.

[Caroline R]

Steve_uk is on this forum to do a job. The obvious intention behind this stupid post is to distract attention from the matter under consideration, namely, the fact that Anthony Pargeter’s statement appears to support Jeremy’s claim that the silencer was handed back to the relatives before David Boutflour allegedly found it. 

From a statement by Anthony Pargeter.

“Sometime after the 10 August 1983, I received a telephone call from David Boutflour who is a cousin of mine. He told me the silencer had been returned to the family, presumably by the police. He said there was a large scratch on it, some red paint on the knurled end and what appeared to be blood. I advised David to return it to the police straight away.”

Bamber’s allegations.

1 That police officers returned the sound moderator to members of his family, where with police knowledge it was tampered with and then returned to the police, where evidence was found. (statement pages 2 - 5)

2 That collusion took place between police officers and witnesses to put paint on the silencer. (statement page 9)

…...

7 That collusion took place between police officers and David Boutflour in making a statement which contains false evidence.

It happens every time he can't answer a question but thanks for bringing it back Martin!

[Caroline R]

Even a diagnosed nutcase can see that this silencer "so called evidence" should have been thrown out of court. It's a joke it really is.

Or even an undiagnosed one!!  :D

[Boo]

Can you also clear up why you appear to be in support of trolls - seeing as you don't wish to move on... as Roch suggested....

I am not a troll! ... way to make the newbie feel welcome. I am keeping quiet from now on