Should Jeremy defend himself from prison?

[-Harters-]

Why is it not perfect , lawyers do not work for the minimum wage

No sometimes they work pro-bono.

[-Harters-]

No sometimes they work pro-bono.

i.e. for the public good. 

[mertol22]

i.e. for the public good. 

Like the recent trash judge who praised a burglar for having courage ? what next medal of bravery ?

[guest154]

Like the recent trash judge who praised a burglar for having courage ? what next medal of bravery ?

He wasn't praising, I'm sure you didn't believe that's what he was saying when you read the FULL story.

[-Harters-]

I don't understand why people don't understand me sometimes. 

To be perfectly honest I don't even think he should be allowed his various websites, but that's an argument for another day.

[guest154]

To be perfectly honest I don't even think he should be allowed his various websites, but that's an argument for another day.

I agree completely. The fact that people in prisons, rapists, child killers, murderers, fraudsters etc etc are allowed internet access......is something that needs to be stopped IMO.

[mertol22]

He wasn't praising, I'm sure you didn't believe that's what he was saying when you read the FULL story.

i dont believe our system works jeremy bamber would have nothing to loose if he is allowed such a presentation, let people see make up their own mind, it could be his last real chance anyway i guess thats why he may wish it.

[guest154]

i dont believe our system works jeremy bamber would have nothing to loose if he is allowed such a presentation, let people see make up their own mind, it could be his last real chance anyway i guess thats why he may wish it.

Jeremy's 'last real chance' should be decided through legal departments, it should be decided through submissions and the courts - not in a television interview.

[mertol22]

I don't understand why people don't understand me sometimes. 

To be perfectly honest I don't even think he should be allowed his various websites, but that's an argument for another day.

we are told we live in a free society i think its called the internet , what other purpose does it serve other than not to exist at all the invention could have easily have been shelved just like making nuclear weapons .

[-Harters-]

Jeremy's 'last real chance' should be decided through legal departments, it should be decided through submissions and the courts - not in a television interview.

That has and will always be the case, all of this support under the guise of obtaining public awareness is simply boosting his ego, it has no direct effect on his case. Although I suppose it does aid donations and potential representation, but that doesn't affect anybody else.

[-Harters-]

we are told we live in a free society i think its called the internet , what other purpose does it serve other than not to exist at all the invention could have easily have been shelved just like making nuclear weapons .

You and I are very different in many many ways.

[mertol22]

Jeremy's 'last real chance' should be decided through legal departments, it should be decided through submissions and the courts - not in a television interview.

This method is not working , not for him at least  we waste millions of pounds in weapon research every year trying to find smarter ways to destroy people a tv presentation is not going to break the bank is it.

[mertol22]

You and I are very different in many many ways.

That much is certain

[guest154]

This method is not working , not for him at least 

So because he can not LEGALLY prove in COURT he is INNOCENT......he hsould be allowed to try and convince the general public rather than be seen as guilty?
I'm not sure what you've been smoking but feel free to pass it over! 

[-Harters-]

This method is not working , not for him at least  we waste millions of pounds in weapon research every year trying to find smarter ways to destroy people a tv presentation is not going to break the bank is it.

Why not let him host the lottery and just be done with it?