Should Jeremy defend himself from prison?

[Patti]

http://jeremybamber.blogspot.co.uk/

Should Jeremy defend himself from Sutton jail? Please read!

[curiousessex]

Jeremy has been defending his position since 1985.

He has defended himself through the criminal trial, civil court action, appeal courts, CCRC, IPCC, complaints procedures etc.

So yes.... Jeremy is already defending himself from prison.

Currently, given his convictions, where else should he be defending himself from?

[Neil]

http://jeremybamber.blogspot.co.uk/

Should Jeremy defend himself from Sutton jail? Please read!

It would certainly be very interesting but I can't see them allowing it.  Prisoners do currently have the opportunity to challange their convictions, a system already exists. 

[lookout]

http://jeremybamber.blogspot.co.uk/

Should Jeremy defend himself from Sutton jail? Please read!

Hi Patti,I actually read it a couple of days ago and made some notes on here,but it must have fallen on deaf ears/blind eyes.

But I did make more notes on how the media " get it wrong " and feed the public with what they believe is the truth.

According to the Sun,Sheila was slumped 0n the floor with the rifle beside her. Two weeks later,the Sun added," .22 automatic weapon found near the bodies of the two women ( Sheila and June ) "

The Daily Mirror also said the rifle was besides Sheilas' body. They repeated this in their later edition " .22 rifle found by Sheilas' body."

The Evening News Gazette had the rifle laying between Sheila and the body of her mother,June.  A later edition reported," All had been shot with a .22 automatic rifle which was near to Sheilas' body."

The Maldon and Burnham Evening Standard said that" June and Sheila were on the bedroom floor with the rifle laying between them."

The East Anglian Daily Times reported " the rifle was found between Sheila and June."

The Star said " family shot by .22 rifle.Gun laying near Sheilas' body."

[lookout]

So how did that rifle find its way on top of Sheilas' body.? ( looking as though it had been placed there for effect.? ) Questionable,eh.?

[Patti]

Jeremy has been defending his position since 1985.

He has defended himself through the criminal trial, civil court action, appeal courts, CCRC, IPCC, complaints procedures etc.

So yes.... Jeremy is already defending himself from prison.

Currently, given his convictions, where else should he be defending himself from?

Curious did you read the link? I know what you are saying. Maybe I have not made myself clear in what I was asking.....Should he a video link be shared with an audience so that JB can justify why he is innocent from prison? Is this acceptable or not, given the JR that is in place? 

[-Harters-]

Curious did you read the link? I know what you are saying. Maybe I have not made myself clear in what I was asking.....Should he a video link be shared with an audience so that JB can justify why he is innocent from prison? Is this acceptable or not, given the JR that is in place? 

Like an interview you mean?

[Patti]

Like an interview you mean?

Yes Hartley a televised interview 

[-Harters-]

Yes Hartley a televised interview 

Personally I think he should use the legal system just like everybody else has to, but hasn't he already given interviews in the past, just maybe not televised ones?

[gringo]

Curious did you read the link? I know what you are saying. Maybe I have not made myself clear in what I was asking.....Should he a video link be shared with an audience so that JB can justify why he is innocent from prison? Is this acceptable or not, given the JR that is in place? 

Afternoon Patti , it would be interesting to see but I would be surprised if it is allowed .

[guest154]

I'm amused by this. He thinks he is going to be allowed? Who is advising this man???

Look at his wording.

He starts off :
"we are currently going through the process of applying for permission"

Then
"there is absolutely no question that the interview will not go ahead"


Alright Bamber, alright. 

[-Harters-]

I'm amused by this. He thinks he is going to be allowed? Who is advising this man???

Look at his wording.

He starts off :
"we are currently going through the process of applying for permission"

Then
"there is absolutely no question that the interview will not go ahead"


Alright Bamber, alright. 

I can't remember which interview this referred to, maybe it was on radio?
http://www.priti4witham.com/content/priti-patel-calls-parliamentary-debate-prisoners-access-media

[mertol22]

Personally I think he should use the legal system just like everybody else has to, but hasn't he already given interviews in the past, just maybe not televised ones?

Our legal system is a shambles , 2012 and judges wearing stupid silly wigs pure insanity, such a televised approach may or not help, i dont see why not , it would be one step out of the jurasic system we currently have.

[guest154]

Our legal system is a shambles

The vast majority would disagree with you, it works - it isn't perfect but NO legal system in the world is perfect.

i dont see why not , it would be one step out of the jurasic system we currently have.

Because a convicted killer shouldn't be allowed to appear on television when the families are trying to move on with their lives, it is torment.
Bamber should go through the correct procedures like everyone else, he should stop looking for special treatment and should for his own sake - keep quiet whilst his legal team or working on his behalf.

[mertol22]

The vast majority would disagree with you, it works - it isn't perfect but NO legal system in the world is perfect.

Because a convicted killer shouldn't be allowed to appear on television when the families are trying to move on with their lives, it is torment.
Bamber should go through the correct procedures like everyone else, he should stop looking for special treatment and should for his own sake - keep quiet whilst his legal team or working on his behalf.

Why is it not perfect , lawyers do not work for the minimum wage