How can you have witnesses to most of JM's testimony being true as the most damning is what JB allegedly said to her where there were no witnesses.
The matter of whether she would have testified anyway is unknown and cannot be known .
This information was withheld from the jury for the very reason that the prosecution knew it would fatally undermine their case . The jury made clear that they were considering financial motivations of witnesses by enquiring during deliberations about the relatives possible financial incentives . They never asked about JM's possible financial incentives because they had no reason to . This IMO is "lying by omission" . Should the defence have documentation to raise this then I believe it could lead to a great unravelling .
If as you believe this is a non issue then why are the prosecution and JM being so evasive . They appear to understand the importance .
The most damning may have been what Jeremy said to Julie behind closed doors,but look what other witnesses had to say:
Jeremy to James Richards:"I hate my f***ing parents".
Jeremy to Doris Foakes:"I'm not sharing any of my money with Sheila"
Jeremy to Robert Boutflour:"I could easily kill my parents"
Jeremy to Charles Marsden:"If the farm burned down at Christmas I would get everything".
Ralph(Nevill) to Barbara Wilson:"I must never turn my back on that young man".
Jeremy to Liz Rimington:"It's important to have money whilst you're young".
Jeremy to Colin Caffell:"The twins are a millstone round your neck".