You see I don't accept the Defence's telephone call in the first place,so it's again building one hypothesis on another,if you can put yourself in the shoes of the Prosecution for one tiny moment..
I can and do regularly place my self in the shoes of the prosecution, hence my percentage stance which is
roughly born out in my posts
There's just no way that Sheila was the type who would go berserk or go crazy or whatever words you want to describe it with a gun. It was Jeremy who loaded the gun with a magazine don't you see,because he knew that people would say Sheila could never have performed that action,but Jeremy could not predict exactly how much ammunition he would need to kill five people in a rifle whose purpose was to kill vermin.
It's nonsense to suggest that Sheila would not go mad with a light weight easy to use gun. You, Steve_UK cannot know what implements Sheila would or would not go mad with. Then there's the possibility that this is not a one gun crime but multiple weapon crime. That hasn't yet been cleared up enough to my satisfaction. If more than one weapon was used in the incident then you can kiss goodbye to me wearing any prosecution shoes, even if they happen to be Jimmy Choos.
I don't accept the suggestion that somehow Nevill manages to calm Sheila down,then she kicks off again. It's quite clear from the way the bullet cases are scattered that Nevill is shot on the landing yet manages to make his way down to the kitchen, whoever you think the identity of his assailant is,and in these circumstances everyone's natural thoughts are to telephone the Police. Why wake Jeremy up anyway in the middle of the night when he might after all not even pick up the receiver?
You might not accept the suggestion but on what grounds? You have absolutley no idea what took place during the evening, where jeremy Bamber does
not portray Sheila as berserk but distant. Very inconvenient for the likes of you, just as his later blaming of the raid team is. Neither fit whatsoever with Jeremy portraying Sheila as berserk or a nutter. Well actually, the distant portrayal might very well be a genuine and apt description of a prelude to unforeseen mayhem. Why wake Jeremy up in the middle of the night? Have you ever been in such a dire, desperate situation in the small hours. How do you know
exactly who you would turn to or in what order. Everyone's natural instincts? Next time you are facing the prospect of a fight to the death with your daughter, please be kind enough to simultaneously record your 'natural instincts' for prosperity.
It's not just at the White House Farm end that the Jeremy supporters' scenario breaks down. We have Jeremy calmly flicking through the Yellow Pages for ten minutes,as well as telephoning Julie(we won't go into the exact timing of that now as that represents another headache) as we are supposed to believe his words to the Police: "what's taking you so much time..my father sounded terrified when he called" yet Jeremy retracts this at trial which along with other inconsistencies in his evidence make his version of events incredible and the jury's verdict of beyond reasonable doubt a correct one.
Jeremy flicking through the yellow pages actually fits in with David Boutflour's original assessment and the assessment of a non material witness, namely that Jeremy "wouldn't have the gumption" to do this. He's not the sharpest tool in the box when awoke in the middle of the night and doesn't phone 999. Perhaps he had never envisaged receiving such a strange call from his father, nor envisaged the multiple murder of his family occurring while he slept. Perhaps his father had never phoned him before in this manner. perhaps he was momentarily thrown off-kilter. Perhaps he was still stoned.
