Author Topic: Look what you could have won....  (Read 43427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #375 on: September 17, 2012, 09:25:AM »
Maybe if I tell you a little of what Jackie was going through around that time you may show a tiny bit of compassion...

On top of fighting JB's corner, she appears to have been stalked by her managing agent - the person who manages the building in which she lives. I believe this person was using various aliases and continued to hound Jackie in varying forms. She also spread malicious lies about Jackie, going as far to allegedly get some of Jackie's own neighbours to spy on her and report back - this info then made it onto public forums.

I imagine Jackie's guard was up and therefore when you appeared to single her out, she went on the defensive; it's human natrre afterall, given such circumstances.

Hopefully when she re-joins the forum you and her can start again and put the past behind you.

I think it's high time focus was placed on what this forum was set up to do; get to the truth.!

Let's hope the mods nip the 'behind the scenes' business in the bud in order for the activities of those with alternative agendas to stop!

So, what have any of your last few posts got to do with bamber's case?
« Last Edit: September 17, 2012, 09:42:AM by vidvic »
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #376 on: September 17, 2012, 09:38:AM »
Maybe if I tell you a little of what Jackie was going through around that time you may show a tiny bit of compassion...

On top of fighting JB's corner, she appears to have been stalked by her managing agent - the person who manages the building in which she lives. I believe this person was using various aliases and continued to hound Jackie in varying forms. She also spread malicious lies about Jackie, going as far to allegedly get some of Jackie's own neighbours to spy on her and report back - this info then made it onto public forums.

I imagine Jackie's guard was up and therefore when you appeared to single her out, she went on the defensive; it's human natrre afterall, given such circumstances.

Hopefully when she re-joins the forum you and her can start again and put the past behind you.

I think it's high time focus was placed on what this forum was set up to do; get to the truth.!

Let's hope the mods nip the 'behind the scenes' business in the bud in order for the activities of those with alternative agendas to stop!

If you're going to post Jackie's private business all over the internet you should at least try to get it right. Jackie lost her case a year ago and the recent hearing was on costs. It's true to say that the applicant company did not get the amount it claimed for, but Petey is a lawyer and will tell you that that is more often than not the case. It's hard to see how losing your case and being ordered to pay a part of the other side's costs can be claimed as a victory.

As to the allegations of stalking and whatever other plainly mental accusations you are making, Jackie has provided literally hundreds of print outs to the police, who have confirmed in writing that they have seen absolutely nothing that would substantiate that claim.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #377 on: September 17, 2012, 09:56:AM »
Morning Bridget hope you are well.  I have read some disgusting posts over the past few days which have left a very bad taste in my mouth the way you have been abused by Mrs. Hall should not have been allowed to be posted on this forum.  Whatever issues are going on between you and Jackie Preece should not be brought to this forum it is unethical to say the least and members are not interested in off the forum gossip.  I may add since I joined the forum in April I have not heard you say one wrong word about Jackie Preece and would not have known about this business if Mrs. Hall had not posted it. No doubt I will now be in the firing line once again but I shall just wear my ear plugs :)

Offline Justin G

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #378 on: September 17, 2012, 10:19:AM »
Just to put the record straight Bridget the Directors at last years LVT were not completely exonerated as you have claimed. 

They were found to be guilty of two of the most serious breaches in leasehold law.

Not following the law on S20 Consultation and not supplying accounting documentation relating to the service charges.

Jackie did not get any kind of compensation for the breaches of S20 consultation because she could not supply alternative honest quotes going back to 2003 when the Directors used the flat owners service charge monies (£440) to obtain legal advice from solicitors that they MUST follow the rules of s20 consultation.

The Directors used flat owners money to get this information but chose to hide it.

If Jackie had not challenged the Directors on getting access to service charge documentation then this  information would never have got out.

For her punishment she has been threatened and stalked on three forums.
The police investigation is not over as you well know as you have copies of the police letters.  You know full well the police investigation has been accelerated.
Just as you point out about 'strong circumstantial evidence in the JB case' the police have the same in regards Jackie being stalked but they would like to make the case as strong as possible before anyone is charged.

As far as the costs ruling I would say anyone that tried to claim £8,700 and was told they could only get just over £2000 would feel like they had lost.

Wannabe solicitors what to do with them???

As for you telling Jackie her lease was at an end and she was going to be chucked out of her home?

I hope you have copies of the advice you claimed to have got from 3 different solicitors before you sent that letter to Jackie or you are further in hot water.

Get one of your solicitor friends to look it up you have broken the laws again on harassment and will definitely get charged.

What are all your other 'customers' going to think of all this?

I hear it's all over twitter like Simon McKay was after you outed him!!!

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #379 on: September 17, 2012, 10:27:AM »
Any chance we could do some topic splitting?

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #380 on: September 17, 2012, 10:28:AM »
Any chance we could do some topic splitting?

Or kick jackie off again? Lol
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #381 on: September 17, 2012, 10:30:AM »
Just to put the record straight Bridget the Directors at last years LVT were not completely exonerated as you have claimed.

They were found to be guilty of two of the most serious breaches in leasehold law.

Not following the law on S20 Consultation and not supplying accounting documentation relating to the service charges.

Jackie did not get any kind of compensation for the breaches of S20 consultation because she could not supply alternative honest quotes going back to 2003 when the Directors used the flat owners service charge monies (£440) to obtain legal advice from solicitors that they MUST follow the rules of s20 consultation.

The Directors used flat owners money to get this information but chose to hide it.

If Jackie had not challenged the Directors on getting access to service charge documentation then this  information would never have got out.

For her punishment she has been threatened and stalked on three forums.
The police investigation is not over as you well know as you have copies of the police letters.  You know full well the police investigation has been accelerated.
Just as you point out about 'strong circumstantial evidence in the JB case' the police have the same in regards Jackie being stalked but they would like to make the case as strong as possible before anyone is charged.

As far as the costs ruling I would say anyone that tried to claim £8,700 and was told they could only get just over £2000 would feel like they had lost.

Wannabe solicitors what to do with them???

As for you telling Jackie her lease was at an end and she was going to be chucked out of her home?

I hope you have copies of the advice you claimed to have got from 3 different solicitors before you sent that letter to Jackie or you are further in hot water.

Get one of your solicitor friends to look it up you have broken the laws again on harassment and will definitely get charged.

What are all your other 'customers' going to think of all this?

I hear it's all over twitter like Simon McKay was after you outed him!!!

You see this is why you keep losing, you just don't get it. No one has been 'found guilty' of anything. Google 'dispensation'. Trotting out the same lame old arguments that failed at the tribunal will not get you anywhere, and frankly I'm so bored of seeing them that my eyes are starting to bleed.

Morning Bridget hope you are well.  I have read some disgusting posts over the past few days which have left a very bad taste in my mouth the way you have been abused by Mrs. Hall should not have been allowed to be posted on this forum.  Whatever issues are going on between you and Jackie Preece should not be brought to this forum it is unethical to say the least and members are not interested in off the forum gossip.  I may add since I joined the forum in April I have not heard you say one wrong word about Jackie Preece and would not have known about this business if Mrs. Hall had not posted it. No doubt I will now be in the firing line once again but I shall just wear my ear plugs :)

Morning Susan! Do you have a spare pair?
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #382 on: September 17, 2012, 10:49:AM »
Maybe if I tell you a little of what Jackie was going through around that time you may show a tiny bit of compassion...

On top of fighting JB's corner, she appears to have been stalked by her managing agent - the person who manages the building in which she lives. I believe this person was using various aliases and continued to hound Jackie in varying forms. She also spread malicious lies about Jackie, going as far to allegedly get some of Jackie's own neighbours to spy on her and report back - this info then made it onto public forums.

I imagine Jackie's guard was up and therefore when you appeared to single her out, she went on the defensive; it's human natrre afterall, given such circumstances.

Hopefully when she re-joins the forum you and her can start again and put the past behind you.

I think it's high time focus was placed on what this forum was set up to do; get to the truth.!

Let's hope the mods nip the 'behind the scenes' business in the bud in order for the activities of those with alternative agendas to stop!


Hi Stephanie..I'd go and have a coffee if I were you if you're still around. Make that a couple of paracetamols too,as you need them on here at times.!

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #383 on: September 17, 2012, 06:39:PM »
Any chance we could do some topic splitting?

I think there is a case for arguing that posts relating to a civil court matter between forum / ex forum members should be removed.  I don't know if other members agree.  I also think that JutinG might be Steph?
 

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #384 on: September 17, 2012, 06:40:PM »
I think there is a case for arguing that posts relating to a civil court matter between forum / ex forum members should be removed.  I don't know if other members agree.  I also think that JutinG might be Steph?

Roch - are you able to confirm via I.P that Stephanie and JustinG are the same person? Because Justin G has been sending numerous PM's linking memebrs here to a forum which talks about my kid and claims I am John Lamberton - so if you or NGB can help link stephanie and justing for me it would help with my formal complaint against Stephanie Hall.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #385 on: September 17, 2012, 06:46:PM »
Roch  I posted that up this morning matters between forum members and ex should not be on this forum it is unethical and I am sure very distressing for the member still on the forum.  As a result of my post I have now been accused this evening by Mrs Hall as being Lamberton.  At least that takes the heat of you Mat you can relax and go back to being Mat :)

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #386 on: September 17, 2012, 06:47:PM »
Lamberton's brother is a convicted nonce - do you think this sort of thing runs in the blood?

Errr... no., I don't think so?

Roch  I posted that up this morning matters between forum members and ex should not be on this forum it is unethical and I am sure very distressing for the member still on the forum.  As a result of my post I have now been accused this evening by Mrs Hall as being Lamberton.  At least that takes the heat of you Mat you can relax and go back to being Mat :)

Sadly, I can't. We're both John Lamberton now, Susan. Oh well!  ;D

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Look what you could have won....
« Reply #387 on: September 17, 2012, 07:32:PM »
Erm, no? I have no idea what that is you've just posted.