« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Apology  (Read 11327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Apology
« Reply #45 on: July 16, 2012, 05:50:PM »
Hi oncesaid  the theory of Jeremy and the wet suit is just too ridiculous to contemplate.  The police did examine the wet suit anyway and returned it.
Logged

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Apology
« Reply #46 on: July 16, 2012, 06:24:PM »
But I have Jeremy's wetsuit.......and it's a one piece!!!
Logged

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Apology
« Reply #47 on: July 16, 2012, 06:25:PM »
It has never been examined!!!
Logged

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Apology
« Reply #48 on: July 16, 2012, 06:27:PM »
Quote from: Aunt Agatha on July 16, 2012, 06:25:PM
It has never been examined!!!

Who gave it to you AA?
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Apology
« Reply #49 on: July 16, 2012, 06:30:PM »
AA apologies I thought I had read it had been examined by the police.
Logged

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Apology
« Reply #50 on: July 16, 2012, 06:34:PM »
Logged

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Apology
« Reply #51 on: July 16, 2012, 06:36:PM »
Quote from: susan ingham on July 16, 2012, 06:30:PM
AA apologies I thought I had read it had been examined by the police.






I have read that on here too but it is not the case.  Case of misunderstanding I think.

It has been available for tests..........but I have never been asked for it!
Logged

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Apology
« Reply #52 on: July 16, 2012, 06:37:PM »
Quote from: Aunt Agatha on July 16, 2012, 06:34:PM
Jeremy.

The one that went to the lab was definately a two piece and came from WHF, not Goldhanger, could it be another one? Not that it really matters since they didn't find anything on it as far as I know.
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Apology
« Reply #53 on: July 16, 2012, 06:38:PM »
Quote from: Aunt Agatha on July 16, 2012, 06:34:PM






Jeremy.
I told them that AA. But they didn't seem to believe me? They will continue to believe the crackpot ideas of RWB.
Logged

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Apology
« Reply #54 on: July 16, 2012, 06:39:PM »
Quote from: grahame on July 16, 2012, 06:38:PM
I told them that AA. But they didn't seem to believe me? They will continue to believe the crackpot ideas of RWB.

I've yet to meet anyone that believes the wet suit theory.
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Apology
« Reply #55 on: July 16, 2012, 06:39:PM »
Quote from: Bridget on July 16, 2012, 06:37:PM
The one that went to the lab was definately a two piece and came from WHF, not Goldhanger, could it be another one? Not that it really matters since they didn't find anything on it as far as I know.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1095.msg34416.html#msg34416
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Apology
« Reply #56 on: July 16, 2012, 06:45:PM »
Quote from: Bridget on July 16, 2012, 06:39:PM
I've yet to meet anyone that believes the wet suit theory.
Well enough people on here have mentioned it. But few acknowledge that it was from RWB's jumbo book of crackpot ideas. And the police believed it enough to examine "a" wetsuit.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 06:46:PM by grahame »
Logged

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Apology
« Reply #57 on: July 16, 2012, 06:47:PM »
Quote from: grahame on July 16, 2012, 06:45:PM
Well enough people on here have mentioned it. But few acknowledge that it was from RWB's jumbo book of crackpot ideas. And the police believed it enough to examine "a" wetsuit.

Mostly BIBs.
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Apology
« Reply #58 on: July 16, 2012, 06:50:PM »
Quote from: Roch on July 16, 2012, 06:39:PM
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1095.msg34416.html#msg34416







I have only browsed these pages and have neither contributed or paid any great attention of late, so forgive me if this sounds ridiculous or has already been stated, but...........

The link that Roch has just given - if the wetsuit where a two piece, wouldn't each piece be given a different article code?

The suit I have is jacket at top (because it has long sleeves) and trousers....but its one piece!   Black and red!

Are you absolutely certain, without question, it was/is a two piece that the police looked at and examined and not a one piece?
Logged

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Apology
« Reply #59 on: July 16, 2012, 06:52:PM »
Quote from: Aunt Agatha on July 16, 2012, 06:50:PM






I have only browsed these pages and have neither contributed or paid any great attention of late, so forgive me if this sounds ridiculous or has already been stated, but...........

The link that Roch has just given - if the wetsuit where a two piece, wouldn't each piece be given a different article code?

The suit I have is jacket at top (because it has long sleeves) and trousers....but its one piece!   Black and red!

Are you absolutely certain, without question, it was/is a two piece that the police looked at and examined and not a one piece?

Yes, certain, it's mentioned as two articles in 3 different places and this one was red and blue.
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »