Congratulations

[tonyb]

Neither are you the only defence siding poster who questions Mike's arguments / theories.

Agreed.
And the news tonight reinforces my fence sitting stance.
The truth is out.

[Roch]

Agreed.
And the news tonight reinforces my fence sitting stance.
The truth is out.

What news? 

[tonyb]

What news? 

Mikes finally admitted he hasn't a copy in any form of SC on the bed,the one on his hard drive etc,etc

[Roch]

Mikes finally admitted he hasn't a copy in any form of SC on the bed,the one on his hard drive etc,etc

I doubt many believed he did have.  First it was a bed shot with two wounds, then a bed shot with one wound.  Initially the two shot bed photo was the one seen at E Smith's offices then he introduced the Z stuff with the one shot photo which he stated he did not have.  Then when explaining how the two shot photo went missing he said he kept a copy on his hard drive.  It was supposed to be one of the raid team or SOC who retained the single shot photo... It all got a bit confusing for me so I switched off.  I hope Mike explains why he has been posting that he had a copy of whatever photo it was supposed to be.

[elphick]

I doubt many believed he did have.  First it was a bed shot with two wounds, then a bed shot with one wound.  Initially the two shot bed photo was the one seen at E Smith's offices then he introduced the Z stuff with the one shot photo which he stated he did not have.  Then when explaining how the two shot photo went missing he said he kept a copy on his hard drive.  It was supposed to be one of the raid team or SOC who retained the single shot photo... It all got a bit confusing for me so I switched off.  I hope Mike explains why he has been posting that he had a copy of whatever photo it was supposed to be.

And include in that explanation why he needed to take pictures of the hard drives where the photo(s) were and then take the hard drives to a 'safe house'.

[tonyb]

This is what pisses me off to the MAX. He bangs on and on he's got such and such,but can't reveal it for one reason or another,then builds a theory around it. Lemmings follow him religiously off the cliff and BOOM !!
He built his house on sand.....  God help us and JB.

[Patti]

Mikes finally admitted he hasn't a copy in any form of SC on the bed,the one on his hard drive etc,etc

I must say that sometimes things are incorrect from time to time and I always take most of it like a pinch of salt....it is always best to do some research for yourself, that way you can identify the right facts...

There is a lot of BS around not on this forum, but on the internet as a whole...Always go with what you know and not what you are told......Hope this comment does not offend.

But, the only thing that will help Jeremy Bamber is truth, facts and evidence....If anyone can find flaws then this can be helpful.......

[Caroline R]

But, the only thing that will help Jeremy Bamber is truth, facts and evidence....If anyone can find flaws then this can be helpful.......

Well said Patti! Always the voice of reason! I came with my own ideas and unless someone shows me 'proof', I'll stick with what I know and feel to be the truth. It's easy to get carried along by the hope of a big break and disappointed when it turns to crap - but I think that it might be some small thing that leads to an appeal - some technicality that has been over looked. I doubt it will be anyone here that finds it, but you never know - either way, I'm sure it's out there!

[guest154]

Mikes finally admitted he hasn't a copy in any form of SC on the bed,the one on his hard drive etc,etc

Has he?
I haven't seen him say he doesn't have the photo on his hard drive?

[grahameb]

[/color]

I'm not normally a betting man G, but I've never,ever followed the lemmings on this site,and suffered horrendous verbal abuse for my stance. I ain't no sheep G, so sifting bullshit from fact won't be difficult,on either site.

Well speaking personally I could not mix with those who dedicate their time in deliberate abuse of those who believe there has been a gross miscarriage of justice. There is absolutely no excuse for anyone to behave like that. I have stuck up for people on this forum against those abusers. I'm sorry, but I simply cannot comprehend someone deliberately becoming a member over there. I would never associate myself with anyone of that kind of internet abuser. There must be something wrong with those who can.

[Caroline R]

I'm sorry, but I simply cannot comprehend someone deliberately becoming a member over there. I would never associate myself with anyone of that kind of internet abuser. There must be something wrong with those who can.

Grahame - Where is 'over there'?

[guest154]

Well speaking personally I could not mix with those who dedicate their time in deliberate abuse of those who believe there has been a gross miscarriage of justice. There is absolutely no excuse for anyone to behave like that. I have stuck up for people on this forum against those abusers. I'm sorry, but I simply cannot comprehend someone deliberately becoming a member over there. I would never associate myself with anyone of that kind of internet abuser. There must be something wrong with those who can.

Grahame, I'm starting to get annoyed with all your comments about members who decide to post over there as well as here. I understand that YOU could never post there, you've said it a hundred times. But there is no need to keep on repeating this over and over as well as saying that there must be something wrong with members here that post 'over there' when you know for a fact you're saying there must be something wrong with people that are actually going to read your posts!

[grahameb]

Grahame, I'm starting to get annoyed with all your comments about members who decide to post over there as well as here. I understand that YOU could never post there, you've said it a hundred times. But there is no need to keep on repeating this over and over as well as saying that there must be something wrong with members here that post 'over there' when you know for a fact you're saying there must be something wrong with people that are actually going to read your posts!

Mat. Why are you friends with abusers John Lamberton and Tim Bennett? Do you enjoy the way they abuse members here? You know lamberton is the owner of that forum? Why are you friends with an internet abuser?
Lamberton is a recognised internet abuser and has been thrown off many forums as a result of his abuse. Why do you, knowing this continue to support his forum in frequenting the place? For by even joining his forum and going there is in fact supporting his nevarious activities. Why can't people see that?
"Oh I just go there to get the opposite view", you may say. Well tell me what views can you get from that forum that you can't get here on this forum. For that is where they get all their information from.
I'm sorry Mat I don't think I need to apologise to you or anyone else for my views on this matter and I shall continue to express my views on the matter.
Furthermore I will never trust aqnyone who goes over there and returns here or in fact comes from that cesspool of abuse. I can never overlook the abuse he and his chums have dished out to my friends over here or to my family. And I will always look on those people with suspicion including you Mat. I will be polite to you. But I'm sorry I don't trust you or anyone else who has migrated over here from that God forsaken desolate place of abuse. Even to wishing Tim Bennett a happy holiday is to my mind agreeing with the foul comments that he has made towards members over here.

[Caroline R]

WHERE IS OER THERE???   

[grahameb]

WHERE IS OER THERE???   

Betwix is a great gulf, fixed.