Author Topic: The key(s) to unlocking Jeremy's cell door  (Read 11182 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The key(s) to unlocking Jeremy's cell door
« Reply #75 on: July 16, 2012, 11:12:AM »
Seven photographic negatives are missing which were taken before the ones which show Sheila's body on the floor with two bullet entry wounds to her neck, and the guns barrel in different positions against her throat. The missing  negatives are the ones which show Sheila on the bed with no blood running, leaking and pouring from the corners of her mouth,  which only came about when police moved Sheila's body to the bedroom floor...

Once Sheila's body was moved from the bed to the floor, a police officer wiped away most of the vertical blood flow which had previously leaked out of the lower non fatal entry wound, to give the impression that both wounds had been inflicted close together in real time. They were able to attempt this because blood which had run, and poured and leaked from the upper entry wound had left a duplicated trail close to the lower entry wound which gave an impression that both wounds had been inflicted at the same time? This was a deception that was shallow in presentation, but police got away with it because they withheld a large number of photographs...
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 11:29:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The key(s) to unlocking Jeremy's cell door
« Reply #76 on: July 16, 2012, 11:43:AM »
Once Sheila's body was moved from the bed to the floor, a police officer wiped away most of the vertical blood flow which had previously leaked out of the lower non fatal entry wound, to give the impression that both wounds had been inflicted close together in real time. They were able to attempt this because blood which had run, and poured and leaked from the upper entry wound had left a duplicated trail close to the lower entry wound which gave an impression that both wounds had been inflicted at the same time? This was a deception that was shallow in presentation, but police got away with it because they withheld a large number of photographs...

A key feature which helps to establish this was / is the trail of blood which originally ran out of Sheila's left nostril, and then ran backwards into her left eye socket. The direction of blood flow present was not duplicated in the flow of blood from either side of her mouth, thus proving that Sheila originally was only bleeding from her nose, which ran backwards into her left eye socket as a result of her being lifted and carried off the bed and placed on the bedroom floor? At this stage, her head fell backwards which in turn caused the blood from her nose to flow under the force of gravity into her eye socket. If she had been bleeding from the corners of her mouth by this time, that too would have run in t me direction as blood from her nostril
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The key(s) to unlocking Jeremy's cell door
« Reply #77 on: July 16, 2012, 12:00:PM »
Thanks for the explanation Mike but what you have sent doesn't show any of that at all. For a start, the things you sent are from the March previous to the murders. 3 pages of it appears to be hand written lists of calls (many to the hospital in Northampton), but who wrote those, what are they? None of the information contained in the hand written lists can be found on the two actual printouts that were also provided. The printout from Jeremy's cottage only shows the NZ / Aus calls in detail, and the other printout only shows something on the 29th April relating to somewhere in Berkshire, but it's not even clear that it's a call since there is no phone number shown, no call duration, and no indication of the rate charged. Oh and it doesn't say what year it's from.

Handsritten metered call information is recorded on official (approved) forms, which was how the actual metered call log information was obtained and recorded in those days. Furthermore, this information was / is on the police file. Details are recorded on approved forms designed for this purpose. The very fact that the handwritten information is not reproduced on the typed version tells everyone that there was a different way in place for the police to obtain the actual information they required
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...