Television documentary material

[Sparkfilms]

If I may, I will return to the reference to the CPS in the case of The Suffolk Murders.

I watched a television interview by Michael Crimp of the CPS where he was making a statement about the accused. I know that what he said in this statement was incorrect and said as much in my book that was released on the first of February.

There was nothing sinister in what Mr Crimp implied, he just didn't know what he was talking about in this particular instant.

So mistakes can be made, though to be fair to Michael Crimp it made very little difference in general terms.

It is worrying though, that senior people that we put our trust in can be so wide of the mark.

[andrea]

was it you sparkfilms that was going on the matthew wright show today?

[Sparkfilms]

Hello Andrea,

No, I've been dog walking, picking up my grandkids from school and shopping....not to mention buying up loads of vinyl records in charity shops - which are playing now.

[mb1]

I don't get this PII thing. Has it actually been said that evidence is being withheld because of it, or is that just speculation?

The request has to be specific.
My understanding is that 'no response' means nothing found to the specific request.

A request is deemed reasonable if equivalent to one person spending 35 hours evaluating the documents, or up to £600 cost (to the public purse).

Persistent trivial requests by the same applicant can result in blanket refusals. There are some people who write to their local authorities on a weekly basis!
 

[andrea]

somebody yesterday on this forum, mentioned that they were goin on the matthew wright show today, and was going to ask matthew if he could discuss jeremy bambers case on his show.i cant remember which thread it was though.....damn!!

[mb1]

Hello Andrea,

No, I've been dog walking, picking up my grandkids from school and shopping....not to mention buying up loads of vinyl records in charity shops - which are playing now.

The crackle of vinyl... wonderful!

I have a Roxy Music track lovingly worn by overplay - every listen's a memory!

[Jackiepreece]

Let's just start with those 200 photos please

[Sparkfilms]

Christine Perfect on the turntable here, she was half way between Chicken Shack and Fleetwood Mac at the time.

[andrea]

why dont we start a "anything goes thread" for a bit of  "lighter" chat?

[Sparkfilms]

For Andrea,

Any of the following could possibly appear on television to discuss this case.

Each of these guys are dedicated supporters of Jeremy Bamber.

Scott Lomax

Andrew Hunter

Bob Woffinden

( Bob pretty much goes along with Mike Tesko I think ).

[andrea]

but would they be limited as to what they could say due to legal reasons? as it all stands now

[Sparkfilms]

For Andrea,

I'm not sure - but if you get a chance go to the Jeremy Bamber page on Wikipedia and check out what Bob Woofinden says about the case, I would say from reading this that Bob and Mike Tesko are in complete agreement that Shelia was alive in the house, and it was her that Jeremy and the police saw in the window.

I have always believed someone was seen in the window.

[Jackiepreece]

By saying that you  must definitely think Jeremy is innocent

[Sparkfilms]

Back to the window thing.

I've just read the Bob Woofinden piece again that was in The Daily Mail a few years back.

I had to read it three or four times to get my head straight on what he is saying - most of you will get it quicker than that. He seems sure that the figure moving in the window was that of Shelia Caffell.

The key piece for me is how the police have searched upstairs and only accounted for the bodies of the twins and June Bamber. The officers return to a hallway and with 3 staircases in the farmhouse his theory is that Shelia was moving around in the house while the police were checking all the rooms upstairs.

They hear a sound from upstairs and call out for Shelia, was it the gun shot that they heard? I know this has been covered many times, and I have always wondered ( this is for Mike ) if this common theory has been discussed between Bob Woofinden, Scott Lomax and Mike Tesko at any time. Or perhaps more interestingly, if three different individuals have come to the same conclusion without conferring with one another.

After using mirror devices and the like a later inspection upstairs accounts for a total of 4 bodies.

This cameo of events makes the telephone calls and pretty much everything that has been processed in the appeal documents seem far less significant.

As I mentioned a few days ago, only the police can confirm if this description by Mr Woofinden ( and Mike ) actually occured.

It's only a complicated case if a simple answer was witheld.

[mb1]

Depends how thoroughly police were examining each room on that first recce. They would have been racing through, seeing who was alive, who dead, trying not to damage evidence, tread in spatter etc.

Sheila's body was the other side of the bed. Could that have been seen from the doorway? Would an officer have the viewed the scene and said "1 in here", particularly if they were using a mirror device?

One thing - there's a door connecting to other bedrooms on Neville's side of the bed. That was open, right?