Phone call to police

[grahameb]

She said that the solicitor told her that if she made a deal with one of the papers that this would stop her being hounded by the others. Utter rubbish. She was still hounded and the solicitor's advice was wrong. Anyone with common sense could see that.

[Patti]

She contradicts herself on this as well. For she says, the harassment of media went quiet inbetween, then in the next breath she said the media harassment never stopped...So which is it?

PC Jones informed her of the verdict, she was in an hotel at the time...was it provided by the NOTW? Was she ever asked which hotel she was in...was there any investigation about it at the time with JB's defence lawyer?

I agree with your last comment...

[Jane]

Remember that she volunteered the information about her offences. As to her motives for saying what she did, I'm sure the jury were invited to believe that, and didn't.

How true is it that deals can be done regarding prosecutions? If this is so, wouldn't it make sense for her to own up to the cheque book fraud in order to have dismissed that she may have been seen as colluding with a murder plan and withholding information about a murder having been committed.

[Ben]

Did JB not say to Mugford words to the effect that all is going well, there is trouble at WHF - that makes it somewhat different....

Also if the call to his house from WHF was logged how else could he explain that phone call ? Maybe that was a big mistake on the part of the killer and JB had to subsequently try and explain it by telling Police that it was his Father that made the call in an attempt to explain how a call was made from a house full of corpses....

Jeremy by saying he had a phone call and going along with the Police was his alibi for the night-if left till next morning he would have been a suspect with no alibi!

[Steve_uk]

Jeremy by saying he had a phone call and going along with the Police was his alibi for the night-if left till next morning he would have been a suspect with no alibi!

Yes Ben that's a good point. We're back to the bicycle scenario again..

[Ben]

Oh yes I forgot he wore gloves and a wetsuit and flippers and a muffler and more clothes than he needed for the time of years. Oh I forgot. He rode a bike as well.

Yes and left a fully loaded Gun on the table with his Mad sister about and young children!! Who would believe it!!

[Steve_uk]

At that stage Julie Mugford was trying to avoid an accessory to murder charge,so it's not surprising she goes along with DS Stan Jones' suggestion if it was his to admit to the cheque fraud. She didn't know what lay ahead as far as the trial was concerned-for all she knew Jeremy Bamber could have pleaded guilty and implicated her in the murders.

[Steve_uk]

Until you can prove that Julie Mugford lied on the salient points of her evidence,namely that Jeremy Bamber had discussed with her the means of disposing by force of his family on several occasions for a year in the run-up to the events at White House Farm I doubt that the authorities will move for a retrial.

[lebaleb]

One wonders how two students managed to pay back to the bank such a substantial sum within 3 weeks.

[grahameb]

Yes Ben that's a good point. We're back to the bicycle scenario again..

Yes back to the silly old RWB crackpot idea again. What will we ever do without good old Agatha Christie RWB?

[grahameb]

Yes and left a fully loaded Gun on the table with his Mad sister about and young children!! Who would believe it!!

Well why would he admit to leaving the gun on the settle if he was going to do himself? He needen't have said anything at all.

[grahameb]

Until you can prove that Julie Mugford lied on the salient points of her evidence,namely that Jeremy Bamber had discussed with her the means of disposing by force of his family on several occasions for a year in the run-up to the events at White House Farm I doubt that the authorities will move for a retrial.

You don't need to prove that she was lying simply because she has no one to back up her story.

[grahameb]

One wonders how two students managed to pay back to the bank such a substantial sum within 3 weeks.

We would even be forgiven in thinking that someone else paid of their debts for them wouldn't you?

[susan]

Grahame  how much was the debt the two of them paid back to the Bank in 3 weeks.

[Jane]

We would even be forgiven in thinking that someone else paid of their debts for them wouldn't you?

e
Grahame, hi, good morning, tut tut and meeouw!!! Yes, we would!!!