Phone call to police

[andrea]

What connects Sheila to the crime, she had a mental illness, thats about it!

[jon]

What connects Sheila to the crime, she had a mental illness, thats about it!

Errr , she was at the scene of the crime , prove JB was , at the relevant time !!
Also what was your view regarding LD tests , when you believed JB innocent ?

[-Harters-]

That's irrelevant and not actually true, if you replaced 'physical' with 'direct' then you would be more accurate.

By irrelevant, I mean that people are not trying to convict Jeremy, that's already been done, people are trying to show that he is innocent and that hasn't been done. The fact that you disagree with the evidence put forward during the original trial, in no way adds weight to any argument that he is innocent, unless you are providing contradictory evidence which suggests that something else took place.

[andrea]

Yes Sheila was at the scene because she was a victim!

Had sheila shot all her family her prints would have been on the gun. There was one.
She would have had other peoples blood on here, there was none.

Dont forget Bamber probably wore gloves, he had over a month to get rid of any evidence connecting him to the crime aswell.

No evidence points to sheila.

[susan]

Hi Caroline R  Yes I have a very large house and when my small doggie even heard a deer out in the grounds it barked like crazy when we were sleeping and awoke the whole house.

[jon]

Yes Sheila was at the scene because she was a victim!

Had sheila shot all her family her prints would have been on the gun. There was one.
She would have had other peoples blood on here, there was none.

Dont forget Bamber probably wore gloves, he had over a month to get rid of any evidence connecting him to the crime aswell.

No evidence points to sheila.

I asked you to prove JB was at the scene of the crime , at the relevant time , it is usually the starting point in most crimes !!

[-Harters-]

Yes Sheila was at the scene because she was a victim!

Had sheila shot all her family her prints would have been on the gun. There was one.
She would have had other peoples blood on here, there was none.

Dont forget Bamber probably wore gloves, he had over a month to get rid of any evidence connecting him to the crime aswell.

No evidence points to sheila.

Yes, Sheila would have had some difficulty is wiping her fingerprints off of the murder weapon (all but one), or disposing of gloves, after she had committed suicide.

[Jane]

How do we know that her bed had not been slept in?

Hello Neil. Perhaps it hadn't been, but is there anything to suggest that she hadn't been in bed with one of the boys? I have the impression they may have felt spooked at WHF.

[grahameb]

The pro speculations are better than the anti's speculations.

[andrea]

I asked you to prove JB was at the scene of the crime , at the relevant time , it is usually the starting point in most crimes !!

I dont need to, John. That was dealt with 27 years ago when Jb was found Guilty. The onus is on you to prove Sheila did it.

There is none, hence why Jb is in the slammer.

[grahameb]

Yes Sheila was at the scene because she was a victim!

Had sheila shot all her family her prints would have been on the gun. There was one.
She would have had other peoples blood on here, there was none.

Dont forget Bamber probably wore gloves, he had over a month to get rid of any evidence connecting him to the crime aswell.

No evidence points to sheila.

Oh yes I forgot he wore gloves and a wetsuit and flippers and a muffler and more clothes than he needed for the time of years. Oh I forgot. He rode a bike as well.

[andrea]

It still remains fact Grahame that JB had a month to dispose of any evidence connecting him to the crime.

Sheila was murdered, like the others. 

[susan]

Hi Neil  when marie27 was on the forum he said Sheila lay on top of the bed as it was a very humid night
but when it was mentioned 15minutes later that Ralph and June had quite alot of covers on their bed he said it was a very cool night for the time of year. The weather changed from room to room

[grahameb]

I dont need to, John. That was dealt with 27 years ago when Jb was found Guilty. The onus is on you to prove Sheila did it.

There is none, hence why Jb is in the slammer.

The only difference is that 27 years ago Bamber was convicted on the word of one unreliable witness and a corrupted piece of silencer evidence. But today none of the BGB will be satisfied unless we PROVE bamber to be guilty. Hardly an equal challence.

[jon]

I dont need to, John. That was dealt with 27 years ago when Jb was found Guilty. The onus is on you to prove Sheila did it.

There is none, hence why Jb is in the slammer.

Brilliant Andrea !! Never read an explanation like that on here before !!
When you get a chance remind us all , about your views regarding LD tests
when you believed JB innocent !!