« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 37   Go Down

Author Topic: telephone logs.  (Read 84636 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #390 on: July 13, 2012, 07:08:PM »
Quote from: susan ingham on July 13, 2012, 07:07:PM
Bridget  you are being so naughty you know where you will be going shortly :)

again?  :(
Logged
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #391 on: July 13, 2012, 07:14:PM »
Quote from: Caroline R on July 13, 2012, 07:05:PM
Not kicking him - just the theory!
I wasnt kicking him Neil, neither was I angry. I just said I thought it was a rubbish theory. Thats fair enough I thought.
Logged

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #392 on: July 13, 2012, 07:17:PM »
Mags  I have always considered you to be a very fair person who does accept other people's views even though they maybe be rubbish so don't know what the lovely Mr.Neil is talking about God Bless Him :)
Logged

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #393 on: July 13, 2012, 07:22:PM »
Quote from: maggie on July 13, 2012, 07:14:PM
I wasnt kicking him Neil, neither was I angry. I just said I thought it was a rubbish theory. Thats fair enough I thought.

Yes very fair. But I never said you were angry, I said I couldn't understand why people were getting angry. If you read back a couple of pages you will see a few confrontational angry comments against anybody entertaining the idea, I just thought it was strange behavior over a relatively unimportant point.

If you don't see that then it doesn't matter, but I wasn't calling you angry or even dismissing your opinion. I'd like to think my reply to Neil was fairly well balanced.
Logged

Neil

  • Guest
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #394 on: July 13, 2012, 07:26:PM »
Quote from: maggie on July 13, 2012, 07:14:PM
I wasnt kicking him Neil, neither was I angry. I just said I thought it was a rubbish theory. Thats fair enough I thought.
Oh no no ..... I realise that you weren't being personal or getting angry.  I just felt responsible for, in effect, making Hartley put forward the 'bike theory', which he doesn't necessarily support and then see his words ridiculed. 
Logged

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #395 on: July 13, 2012, 07:55:PM »
Quote from: Bridget on July 13, 2012, 07:05:PM
Of course - they love a bit of bog snorkling in them thar estuaries and it washes blood off a treat!

Couldn't have been wearing flippers though eh? They'd have gotton caught in the chain!
Logged

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #396 on: July 13, 2012, 08:14:PM »
Quote from: Neil on July 13, 2012, 07:26:PM
Oh no no ..... I realise that you weren't being personal or getting angry.  I just felt responsible for, in effect, making Hartley put forward the 'bike theory', which he doesn't necessarily support and then see his words ridiculed.
you are a really nice guy Neil. :D
Logged

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #397 on: July 13, 2012, 08:24:PM »
Quote from: Caroline R on July 13, 2012, 07:55:PM
Couldn't have been wearing flippers though eh? They'd have gotton caught in the chain!

Hi Caroline

I don't think he was wearing a wet suit either. I remember Aunt Agatha saying she has Jeremy's wet suit...I do believe she also said it had been examined, but someone might correct me.. :) :) :) :)
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #398 on: July 13, 2012, 08:26:PM »
Quote from: maggie on July 13, 2012, 05:07:PM
Thanks Caroline, that poor policeman must have been shattered and it didn't prove anything. ;D
There is no proof Maggie. It's just a one of many wild idiotic musings of RW Boutflour. Absolutely no proof whatsoever that Jeremy did any such thing. If Jeremy has been in prison for 27 years convicted on trumped up evidence why is the BGB continually trying to find more trumped up evidence to try and convince other mugs that he is guilty? Are the relatives that afraid of him getting out? Well I can tell you for a fact that they heaved a great sigh of relief when the CCRC didn't refer his case to the court of appeal? I wonder why they are so paranoid about him?
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #399 on: July 13, 2012, 08:28:PM »
Quote from: Bridget on July 13, 2012, 07:05:PM
Of course - they love a bit of bog snorkling in them thar estuaries and it washes blood off a treat!
You forget, he went to France to wash the wet suit.
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #400 on: July 13, 2012, 08:29:PM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on July 13, 2012, 05:26:PM
Let's put it this way..he was not asleep in an armchair in John O' Groats with his wife and children around to vouch that he never stirred from his slumber. He was in Goldhanger,with no alibi,10 minutes away from the crime scene.
No alibi? What a crap murderer.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #401 on: July 13, 2012, 08:31:PM »
Quote from: grahame on July 13, 2012, 08:26:PM
There is no proof Maggie. It's just a one of many wild idiotic musings of RW Boutflour. Absolutely no proof whatsoever that Jeremy did any such thing. If Jeremy has been in prison for 27 years convicted on trumped up evidence why is the BGB continually trying to find more trumped up evidence to try and convince other mugs that he is guilty? Are the relatives that afraid of him getting out? Well I can tell you for a fact that they heaved a great sigh of relief when the CCRC didn't refer his case to the court of appeal? I wonder why they are so paranoid about him?

Yes,Grahame,,,I wonder why they're paranoid. Also JM who says she " fears for her children if he's ever released ".In Canada.? Jeremy wouldn't hurt a fly,,but by jove,they've all hurt him.
Read his latest blog on Bambertweets.Interesting.
Logged

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #402 on: July 13, 2012, 08:32:PM »
Quote from: lookout on July 13, 2012, 08:31:PM
Yes,Grahame,,,I wonder why they're paranoid. Also JM who says she " fears for her children if he's ever released ".In Canada.? Jeremy wouldn't hurt a fly,,but by jove,they've all hurt him.
Read his latest blog on Bambertweets.Interesting.

Hi lookout, I have just read Jeremy's lasted blog and it is brilliant... :) :) :)
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #403 on: July 13, 2012, 08:32:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on July 13, 2012, 05:35:PM
Any one or more of the relatives who ended up benefitting from the Bamber parents estate, were also not too far away, and none was asked for an alibi...
Exactly. I wonder who could have murdererd them? Why weren't they asked for an alibi? Oh I know. Because it were they who continually pestered the police to distraction in order to put the blame on Jeremy.
Logged

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: telephone logs.
« Reply #404 on: July 13, 2012, 08:35:PM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on July 13, 2012, 06:57:PM
No the Police forgot to ask whether Mabel Speakman could ride a bike..
That suggestion is as daft as the bike theory itself.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 37   Go Up
« previous next »