telephone logs.

[grahameb]

You do quite a lot !!

Don't worry jon we all know where he gets that saying from. The BGB are governed by prejudice alone and nothing else.

[grahameb]

On the subject of clothes did we ever get to the bottom of why Jeremy was wearing more clothes than normal for August back at Goldhanger cottage?

What on earth does that prove. So he was wearing a lot of clothes according to one policeman. If he committed the murders with lots of clothes on don't you think he would have the common sense to take them off before meeting the police? How many more rediculous insinuations must we put up with?

[susan]

Grahame  I think you are forgetting he would have his wet suit on under his clothes

[Bridget]

Could you provide a reference to that information please?

Ann Eaton's COLP statement if memory serves.

[lookout]

Grahame  I think you are forgetting he would have his wet suit on under his clothes

It was pretty cool that night,,and when you've just got up you feel cold,,and I too would have dressed for the " North Pole " ,,,but I couldn't pedal a bike with that lot on. I've never heard anything so ridiculous.
Some people will believe anything,,,especially when they're puppets having their strings pulled. Bless.

[Bridget]

Some people will believe anything,,,especially when they're puppets having their strings pulled. Bless.

My thoughts exactly.

[lookout]

My thoughts exactly.

Works both ways,,Bridget,,,particularly to those who are related. ( string-pullers )

[-Harters-]

My thoughts exactly.

Funnily enough, mine also.

[Neil]

On a slightly different subject.  How many residential properties would Jeremy have to pass on his way to or from the farm?  Is it believed (by the BGB's) that Jeremy drove home from work and then returned later on the bicycle?  He then cycled back to Goldhanger?  If that were the case, would you expect him to be spotted by at least one witness on either journey?

[Caroline R]

On a slightly different subject.  How many residential properties would Jeremy have to pass on his way to or from the farm?  Is it believed (by the BGB's) that Jeremy drove home from work and then returned later on the bicycle?  He then cycled back to Goldhanger?  If that were the case, would you expect him to be spotted by at least one witness on either journey?

You would think so! But if you had planned such a crime, would you even RISK being seen? After all, if one person sees you - the game is up!

[susan]

Hi Neil  we had a post up the other day I think it was by keeper who lives in the area and said all the people around there are very nosey so somebody would have seen him.  Could be wrong about the poster but the post is correct.

[Neil]

Hi Neil  we had a post up the other day I think it was by keeper who lives in the area and said all the people around there are very nosey so somebody would have seen him.  Could be wrong about the poster but the post is correct.

Hi Susan, yes I did read that.  Would be interesting to know roughly how many houses he would have to have passed, not to mention the odd passing motorist.

[Neil]

You would think so! But if you had planned such a crime, would you even RISK being seen? After all, if one person sees you - the game is up!

Hi Caroline, yes my thoughts exactly.

[susan]

Hi Caroline R  Jeremy would know the area so well and even if he had been on June's bike he would not take the risk.  Too ridiculous for words especially as it has been suggested he was wearing a wet suit.

[Caroline R]

It doesn't need to be dismissed, he was convicted 27 years ago. The onus is no longer on the prosecution to prove his guilt, that has already been done in a court of law.

He was indeed - he was convicted without any physical evidence linking him to the deaths, the crime scene couldn't have been more contaminated even if Hannibal had walked through it with his elephants and evidence was hidden from the defence! Proven? Not likely!!