Author Topic: Polygraph Testing  (Read 68358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #435 on: July 30, 2012, 01:59:PM »
Hi Patti  thanks for the information on the polygraph testing seems quite complex to me but you would think these experts would know that if you put a drawing pin in your shoe you can pass the test.  Maybe they check your shoes out before the test :)

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #436 on: July 30, 2012, 06:44:PM »
Hi Patti  thanks for the information on the polygraph testing seems quite complex to me but you would think these experts would know that if you put a drawing pin in your shoe you can pass the test.  Maybe they check your shoes out before the test :)

I would imagine that it is harder to obatin a drawing pin in prison than it is to pass the test without it!  :)

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #437 on: July 30, 2012, 06:46:PM »
Hi Caroline R  Good thinking never thought where one could find a drawing pin ;)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #438 on: July 30, 2012, 07:06:PM »
if it was that easy why dident adrion prout do it why dident he just put a drawing pin in his shoe.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2012, 07:15:PM by nugnug »

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #439 on: July 30, 2012, 07:11:PM »
Quite right nugnug he could have put a drawing pin in each shoe and passed the polygraph test  :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #440 on: July 30, 2012, 07:16:PM »
i mean a prison that sort of knowledge would get around.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #441 on: July 31, 2012, 02:11:AM »
I really can't understand why Jeremy took this test.  Nobody claims it to be 100 per cent accurate, so imagine if it had concluded that he was lying!  Coupled with the fact that no court in the land would ever admit such evidence, it seemed unnessasarily risky.

Not if you KNOw you're innocent.  :)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #442 on: July 31, 2012, 09:46:AM »
I'm almost certain that had Jeremy committed the crimes,,,he'd have hanged himself years ago at the prospect of him spending the rest of his life,to his dying days,in prison.

He knows,himself,that he didn't commit any murders,,,and this is why he has been pleading his innocence since day one.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #443 on: July 31, 2012, 02:05:PM »
I'm almost certain that had Jeremy committed the crimes,,,he'd have hanged himself years ago at the prospect of him spending the rest of his life,to his dying days,in prison.

He knows,himself,that he didn't commit any murders,,,and this is why he has been pleading his innocence since day one.
I totally agree and if he has pleaded guilty, he would have been eligible for parole by now. Had he been the calculating psycho that some of the press have described, this would have been the easiest option. 'Some' (not all) psychopaths are able to pass the polygraph test, however, it's not so much the test that I find convincing, it's the fact that he agreed to take it - had he failed, it would have been game over. Strange how in the past, the authorities and the media make a big deal when someone fails, but passing gets hardly a mention and makes no difference to the chances of an appeal!

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #444 on: July 31, 2012, 02:16:PM »
I totally agree and if he has pleaded guilty, he would have been eligible for parole by now. ....................................

That's actually not true, the "Whole Life Tariff" was not subsequently placed upon him because he pleaded innocent, it was the premeditation. planning and nature of the crime which is the reason for his "Whole Life Tariff".

Had he pleaded guilty, then the situation regarding his sentence would not be different.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #445 on: July 31, 2012, 02:32:PM »
Even if Jeremy had failed the polygraph test , it would have made no difference to his situation as he was already serving his full life term, however i do feel if he had pleaded guilty at his trial , other than the life term i think no further term would have been placed on him, if you believe the press you will believe anything , a vile corrupt system devoid of purpose, how different it would be if you or i were serving 26 years plus for crimes you say you did not do, this country is not as free as you think there is no democracy or fairness there never has been, with so much evidence destroyed it makes jb s fight much harder, all the destroyed evidence can never come back.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #446 on: July 31, 2012, 03:27:PM »
That's actually not true, the "Whole Life Tariff" was not subsequently placed upon him because he pleaded innocent, it was the premeditation. planning and nature of the crime which is the reason for his "Whole Life Tariff".

Had he pleaded guilty, then the situation regarding his sentence would not be different.

I don't agree! The state does not look favourably on prisoners who don't admit guilt and show remorse. I firmly believe that had JB pleaded guilty, he would never have received the whole life tarriff in the first place. As this didn't happen, we will never know!!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #447 on: July 31, 2012, 03:34:PM »
Even if Jeremy had failed the polygraph test , it would have made no difference to his situation as he was already serving his full life term.

It wouldn't change his situation but it would obviously affected it! Although people say they don't hold much faith in the polygraph test, had he failed the findings would most certainly have influenced people's perceptions of guilty or innocent, making it a whole lot more difficult to win any future appeal!

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #448 on: July 31, 2012, 03:34:PM »
I don't agree! The state does not look favourably on prisoners who don't admit guilt and show remorse. I firmly believe that had JB pleaded guilty, he would never have received the whole life tarriff in the first place. As this didn't happen, we will never know!!

You don't have to agree, but pleading guilty or innocent is not a consideration that can be taken into account whilst applying the tariff.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Polygraph Testing
« Reply #449 on: July 31, 2012, 03:51:PM »
Hi Caroline R  I thought the whole life tarriff was imposed by that dreadful Michael Howard because Jeremy was not admitting to the murders therefore showing no remorse.  I thought his sentence was a minimun of 25 years.