0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
What do you mean.? " Tar everyone with the same brush.".?
Trouble is bridget schizophrenia wasnt really understood even in the 80s and it was all a bit hit and miss. Remember schizophrenics were still kept in locked wards at that time. Sheila had insisted on halving her injection dose just before the deaths. Also I dont think the pm showed all her drugs she was prescribed in her body. As these drugs would in laymans terms be described as 'to dumb her down' it would appear to be a very dangrrous situation. Of course,without all those accesible guns and ammo it would have been much more difficult to cause such havoc.
There were no traces of hard drugs in her blood, only cannabis from a few days previous.
I assume the halving of the dose was agreed and monitored by her doctor though.Even taking Sheila out of the equation I've always thought it odd that there were guns etc lying around with 6 year olds in the house. I accept that this was probably the norm in the average working farmhouse, but the kids hadn't been brought up in that environment. It's easy to criticise after the fact I suppose.
Was skunk around in the 1980s. Its now the most common cannabis but is classed as a class A drug in holland and has very little bearing on original'hashish' . Skunk can cause mental illness and psychotic episodes in people without any underlining mental illness.Sheila woudh have been highly susceptible to this.imho
Even taking Sheila out of the equation I've always thought it odd that there were guns etc lying around with 6 year olds in the house. I accept that this was probably the norm in the average working farmhouse, but the kids hadn't been brought up in that environment. It's easy to criticise after the fact I suppose.
I don't recall it being around, but couldn't say for sure. Drugs have never been my scene.
I guess that's the thing isn't it, we can all go back and pick faults after the event.I'm not sure that the level of care and safety for the firearms in the house was unusually lax for the era, although I admittedly have nothing to offer as a comparison.
Um not picking holes or laying blame at anyones door but it has to be true. Without guns to hand the damage must have been greatly reduced.imho
When I was applying for a shotgun licence the police said that one of the reasons for the requirement for a locked cabinet was to prevent an intruder using my own gun against me. That said, I can see why if guns are used on a daily basis it would be irritating to keep having to retrieve them from a locked cabinet.
I'm only repeating what I've read elsewhere, but I understood that a locked cabinet only became a requirement a couple of years later, 1987 I think, or just after, following the Hungerford Massacre.