The silencer, hand swab, and scratch marks on the aga, Conspiracy...

[Roch]

I haven't seen it Roch, unless you mean that letter that was published?

The defence have not released the paperwork relating to the discovery of her arrest.  The letters regarding immunity were in the guardian, I think there was quite a few letters.  The document referencing the CPS file is in Bamber Twitpics in the archive.  I will find it and provide a link on this post.  The defence have not seen the CPS file (I think - unless that's were the letters came from?).

[-Harters-]

Hartley which comment do you mean?
Can you remember the exact words?

Do you mean ' it stops now' ?

But it wouldn't would it, I am sure there will be more new evidence to start a new investigation

Yes, that was the comment.

It seems that this is somehow being twisted into meaning that the relatives are against disclosure of material held under PII. All I'm saying is that they have not aired that view, to say otherwise is simply untrue, regardless how many times it gets repeated.

[bloggs and son]

By the time theyv'e taken 27 years bed and board out shouldnt think there'll be much left.

I'd sue the arses off them.

[guest154]

The defence have not released the paperwork relating to the discovery of her arrest.  The letters regarding immunity were in the guardian, I think there was quite a few letters.  The document referencing the CPS file is in Bamber Twitpics in the archive.  I will find it and provide a link on this post.  The defence have not seen the CPS file (I think - unless that's were the letters came from?).

Is an immunity deal really that much of a shock though?  It's almost to be expected. It wasn't a deal of "Tell us what we want to hear adn you'll be okay" but more of "tell the truth and you'll be okay."

Yes, that was the comment.

It seems that this is somehow being twisted into meaning that the relatives are against disclosure of material held under PII. All I'm saying is that they have not aired that view, to say otherwise is simply untrue, regardless how many times it gets repeated.

The relatives campaign to keep this material under PII! They don't want it released because it shwos they set Jeremy up! They were in on it with the police! With Julie! with the arms team! The medical examiner! the doctors............I'm joking. 

[JackiePreece]

I refuse to beleive you're close enough to the defence to know anything that isn't already known. the official campaign team have cut their contact with you - so the defence I don't believe tell you anything.




Mat you wrote the above but you have no idea do you?

Any conversations between me and Simon have always been and will continue to be in the strictest of confidence

Sorry to disappoint you

[Roch]

Is an immunity deal really that much of a shock though?  It's almost to be expected. It wasn't a deal of "Tell us what we want to hear adn you'll be okay" but more of "tell the truth and you'll be okay

Here's another slant...

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2832.195.html#lastPost

[-Harters-]

I refuse to beleive you're close enough to the defence to know anything that isn't already known. the official campaign team have cut their contact with you - so the defence I don't believe tell you anything.




Mat you wrote the above but you have no idea do you?

Any conversations between me and Simon have always been and will continue to be in the strictest of confidence

Sorry to disappoint you

Does it matter?

[guest154]

I refuse to beleive you're close enough to the defence to know anything that isn't already known. the official campaign team have cut their contact with you - so the defence I don't believe tell you anything.




Mat you wrote the above but you have no idea do you?

Any conversations between me and Simon have always been and will continue to be in the strictest of confidence

Sorry to disappoint you

I've no interest, Jackie.

Here's another slant...

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2832.195.html#lastPost

thanks, Roch

[bloggs and son]

Yeha, and you said it was a shame me and Bridget don't have a suicide pact. So I think you're just as bad as whoever called him McChancer. Bored of you taking the moral high ground.

I don't think Jackie is taking the moral high ground Mat. I just think she is sick and tired of those on the other forum calling her all kinds of names and then coming over here only to be mocked by the same people here? Personally I can see her point. There are some taking the piss and then are being praised by Lamberton for getting one over on us here? That's all I'm going to say on the matter.

[Nuala]

Could we return to the topic and refrain from posting about personality issues. Thank you.

[Roch]

I don't think Jackie is taking the moral high ground Mat. I just think she is sick and tired of those on the other forum calling her all kinds of names and then coming over here only to be mocked by the same people here? Personally I can see her point. There are some taking the piss and then are being praised by Lamberton for getting one over on us here? That's all I'm going to say on the matter.

I've discussed this with another dual member today.  I don't want to say anything further on the open forum.  I don't think anybody will be able to 'control' the other forum. It's the nature of the beast I'm afraid.

[bloggs and son]

He did, but DNA is a whole different kettle o fish

But they didn't have a complete profile anyway.

[JackiePreece]

I am talking about the topic and PII

[bloggs and son]

Did he show her how to load the gun?

Didn't one of the relatives say they saw him showing her?

[JackiePreece]

Hartley I am interested and you bought it up