Book Reviews - Murders/Suicide at WHF

[Roch]

Both, but I'm only really interested in this one.

Yes... but I meant... do you mean blue on blue or red on blue.  They're both this forum, if that makes sense.

[-Harters-]

Yes... but I meant... do you mean blue on blue or red on blue.  They're both this forum, if that makes sense.

No not really. I'm not distinguishing between forums.

The motivation is the same in my view, and it has nothing to do with wanting to trade Christmas cards.

[susan]

Hi egap1  I have just given up on COE and Roch as they are talking in code between themselves I suspect.  Like you I think debating on the forum can be fun as long as you don,t allow it to become too serious.  I always think an individuals nature shows in the way they post and some of whom I would hate to meet at a give way sign or roundabout.  The thing is enjoy the forum which you do and I may add in a very nice ladylike manner.  The forum can be a very unhealthy place to be and when I feel that I am out of here.

[Roch]

No not really. I'm not distinguishing between forums.

The motivation is the same in my view, and it has nothing to do with wanting to trade Christmas cards.

Well blue on blue will likely be an attempt to identify a prominent member of the guilty camp, especially one that either feeds pro camp paranoia (i.e. 'MI5' / relative / EP) or is simply an unpleasent individual... or even a interesting one.   Red on Blue is designed to expose and possibly degrade a prominent member (mostly but not solely) of the innocent camp.

That's a guess.  I could be wrong.

[maggie]

Hi CoE

Well surely the reasons are infinite and will vary from person to person.  I don't really understand what you're driving at?

As you know communicating online was new to me prior to joining this forum and whilst I think it's sort of good fun/healthy in one way in another I think it's rather bizarre/unhealthy!

I simply don't understand how so much animosity can develop between the reds and blues, trolls (new to me until recent weeks) and the various forum members.  However, to some degree I have been guilty of minor spats (!?) with Maggie.

Hardly a spat egap, I have never born you any ill will.  I'm not really a spatty person.

[susan]

Hi Roch  I think the whole scenario sounds rather childish and I cannot see how it is going to help Jeremy Bamber obtain his freedom it is just childish games and I cannot see how anybody is going to benefit from it.

[susan]

Hi egap1  I can guarantee that Mags does not spat and does not have a spat in her body Maybe you had a slight disagreement with her

[-Harters-]

Well blue on blue will likely be an attempt to identify a prominent member of the guilty camp, especially one that either feeds pro camp paranoia (i.e. 'MI5' / relative / EP) or is simply an unpleasent individual... or even a interesting one.   Red on Blue is designed to expose and possibly degrade a prominent member (mostly but not solely) of the innocent camp.

That's a guess.  I could be wrong.

I don't see a distinction.

I would guess that your latter suggestion is more accurate, however it's not by any means exclusive and equally applies to the blue attempting to discover another blue, a red, a green or an orange.

Or perhaps trying to find out if there actually is anything which could be used to degrade or discredit would be more accurate in most cases.

[maggie]

Hi Maggie

That may be true but perhaps I am ie a spatty person.

I've resisted doing these silly faces but I guess I'll have to join in!  Problem is my eq is so low I can't work out which faces are appropriate so I'll probably upset everyone and end up Billy No Mates :'(

Hi egap, you will find the faces become quite addictive and I find them hard to resist these days, am not convinced theyr'e at all cool tho'. 

[susan]

Hi egap1 my sentiments exactly we are out of the frame just now with those two if it is any consolation I think you are very interesting

[Jane]

Hi egap1 my sentiments exactly we are out of the frame just now with those two if it is any consolation I think you are very interesting

As do I and I'm going to put my hands up and admit to not having a clue about what is meant by mixing colours together. Red and blue create purple in varying shades according to the balance of the mix. So what?

Like egap 1, I'm totally new to this method of communication, and devoid of duplicity because I'm not clever enough to be otherwise, but it seems that there maybe some for whom the only unifying factor is an interest in Jeremy. I fail to see why it's seen as necessary, by some, to know about the private people who are behind their public personas. When I first joined. I had already moved from a position of "he's guilty" to having an open mind. Now, because of evidence presented here about the serious LACK of evidence combined with what appears to be very shady behaviour on the part of the wider family, possibly in collaberation, with others, I'm inclined to believe "he's innocent"

[Roch]

Hi Rochford

Do you think we could be interesting?

   Now there's a thought.  Hope the couch is holding up.

[Roch]

I don't see a distinction.

I would guess that your latter suggestion is more accurate, however it's not by any means exclusive and equally applies to the blue attempting to discover another blue, a red, a green or an orange.

Or perhaps trying to find out if there actually is anything which could be used to degrade or discredit would be more accurate in most cases.

Would you say that your personal ID has been exposed on this forum and info dredged up about you that has been used to degrade you in some way?  Photos of your house or person etc?  If not, then I don't think it's the same.  However I have no wish to minimise your grievance in any way. 

[ngb1066]

I don't see a distinction.

I would guess that your latter suggestion is more accurate, however it's not by any means exclusive and equally applies to the blue attempting to discover another blue, a red, a green or an orange.

Or perhaps trying to find out if there actually is anything which could be used to degrade or discredit would be more accurate in most cases.

You have been very well protected here Hartley and that will continue.  I hope/believe that you realise that.  It has taken some effort I can assure you.  People are naturally curious and there is nothing inherantly wrong in that.  It is the use which is made of information which is important in my view.  We do our best to ensure that proper standards are maintained here.

 

[Roch]

Hi egap1 my sentiments exactly we are out of the frame just now with those two if it is any consolation I think you are very interesting

Sorry for the confusion, it's the colours of the two forums.