Author Topic: Coroners officer, PC 995 Norman Henry Wright, statement - 24th September 1985  (Read 2248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Coroners officer, PC 995 Norman Henry Wright, statement - 24th September 1985

Here are the contents of PC Wright (Coroners officer) Witness statement, dated, 24th September 1985, consisting of 6 pages:-
« Last Edit: May 24, 2012, 10:40:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Here are the contents of his interview / statement in 1991 by City of London Police (COLP):-
« Last Edit: May 24, 2012, 10:38:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Which version of PC Wrights evidence is /was the truth - in the typed statement dated 24th September 1985 the gun was resting on the body, but when he was interviewed by COLP in 1991, he says the rifle has been moved from the body by the time he viewed it in the bedroom?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Which version of PC Wrights evidence is /was the truth - in the typed statement dated 24th September 1985 the gun was resting on the body, but when he was interviewed by COLP in 1991, he says the rifle has been moved from the body by the time he viewed it in the bedroom?

How can he be so wrong about whether the rifle was on the body when he saw it for the first time in the bedroom, the rifle was either on the body or not on the body, it can't have been on the body, and not on the body at the same moment in time....
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
I'm amazed that JM had no reaction at all when she viewed the bodies....no empathy at all. Thank you for sharing this Mike....

I will go over it again tomorrow.... :) :) :) :)

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
I'm amazed that JM had no reaction at all when she viewed the bodies....no empathy at all. Thank you for sharing this Mike....

I will go over it again tomorrow.... :) :) :) :)
Patti, I have often wondered about Julie Mugfords ability to emote and thats a very stro.g example of it. Very strange.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Patti, I have often wondered about Julie Mugfords ability to emote and thats a very stro.g example of it. Very strange.

Hi maggie, I am finding the whole case strange, right from the beginning. How can you not have feelings? I suppose one could say shock...she showed no emotion what so ever. But she is a hero to some. :)

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Hi maggie, I am finding the whole case strange, right from the beginning. How can you not have feelings? I suppose one could say shock...she showed no emotion what so ever. But she is a hero to some. :)
I know shock can do strange things but she didnt show anything .... very odd imo.

No-Bits

  • Guest
The statement and notes at the start of this thread have now been added to the library.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1119.msg34476.html#msg34476


Good luck with the hand writing though.  :o