So, if after returning from a highly stressful situation you notice that something in a log has been written in an ambiguous manner, you should not clarify it?
Well I will tell you what actually happens after an operation of this kind. The soc officers meet for a debriefing and each one reads over his/her notes and if there are any discrepancies it is there that they are ironed out. This explains why all the police statements read as one.
But in actual fact no one sees things exactly the same. Take the Bible as an example. If there had been collusion with the gospel writers then all the gospels would be exactly the same. But there are marked differences that even those who write harmonies of the gospel cannot explain. It that which makes the gospel believable to those who follow Christ. If they all said the same then it would be suspicious. (just an example not to be pressed to the limits)
What I am saying is that these police statements read too perfectly to be true. But it is common practice for police to do that and possibly, no actually alter notes so they are seen to say the same thing. They do this for preparation to go to court.
This too is common practice with solicitors. They do exactly the same. They make sure that all their witnesses say the same thing and it is a logical thing to do.
But the actual notebooks are the first point of reference. The first point of contact if you like and the very fact that sometimes they do not agree it testament to their veracity.
This could explain why certain pages have mysteriously gone missing out of certain police officers notebooks?
