Occupants of CA07, relayed information to control room, from raid team...

[Patti]

Please don't argue guys....As from Monday of next week, you will see less of me, I am returning back to work after a long period of sickness....And, it is mainly due to this forum that I am now much more composed about things...

 
 
Please!

[Roch]

Agreed. You'd need a secondary report that states no marks,such as autopsy(?) which catagorically states there are no marks on the legs, as opposed to a report that doesn't state there are marks, if you see where I'm coming from.

Or high resolution lab blow ups, such as now in the hands of the defence?

[ngb1066]

Please don't argue guys....As from Monday of next week, you will see less of me, I am returning back to work after a long period of sickness....And, it is mainly due to this forum that I am now much more composed about things...

 
 
Please!

Well said Patti.  I hope you are now fully recovered.

[NewChilledOutHartley]

Or high resolution lab blow ups, such as now in the hands of the defence?

I'm not sure that would be enough Rochy.

[Patti]

Hi Keira, I would be very interested in seeing that...I have just looked on the old Bailey sight lolol

It's worth a look to find things out from the past.

All I have is the 1911 census of Eric G Jay...with father and mother.

went back to 1841 but saw nothing.....of what I was looking for.  Aren't we nosey? 

[Bridget]

Agreed. You'd need a secondary report that states no marks,such as autopsy(?) which catagorically states there are no marks on the legs, as opposed to a report that doesn't state there are marks, if you see where I'm coming from.

Sorry to butt in, but why would there be marks anyway?

[susan]

Hi Patti  Sorry we shall be hearing from you less and I am glad you are recovering from your illness also glad to hear the forum has helped you maybe you thought "get me out of here" and made a quicker recovery

[NewChilledOutHartley]

Sorry to butt in, but why would there be marks anyway?

Exactly.

[Bridget]

Please don't argue guys....As from Monday of next week, you will see less of me, I am returning back to work after a long period of sickness....And, it is mainly due to this forum that I am now much more composed about things...

 
 
Please!

Well I'm glad to hear you're better, but sorry to hear we'll be seeing less of you. :/

[Patti]

Thank you guys....

[Patti]

What marks are we on about? Shelia's legs? 

[Roch]

Sorry to butt in, but why would there be marks anyway?

I wondered that also.  What came to mind was the scene from the MWT docu, where Boyce balances the Anschutz across his palms.  I'm guessing that body lain for hours might have impression marks of whatever object may be upon it.

[Bridget]

I wondered that also.  What came to mind was the scene from the MWT docu, where Boyce balances the Anschutz across his palms.  I'm guessing that body lain for hours might have impression marks of whatever object may be upon it.

That would be a new one on me.

[tonyb]

I wondered that also.  What came to mind was the scene from the MWT docu, where Boyce balances the Anschutz across his palms.  I'm guessing that body lain for hours might have impression marks of whatever object may be upon it.

But it is here written also,the rifle was found at the side of SC? Therefore if that's the case it wouldn't of made a mark. There is a lot of contradictory "evidence" about where the rifle was (or not) found so I would imagine the prosecution would not be to troubled by " no marks " IMO.

[bloggs and son]

Sorry to butt in, but why would there be marks anyway?

I think it was because Mike mentioned that there were no marks on Sheila's thighs where the gun was resting?