How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[Bridget]

Perhaps he lost count? He was an alcoholic after all. He was my doctor and he wasn't very good.

Well there you go then!

[mertol22]

   I think it was about another member maybe but it stated that you can't be banned, or I am finally going mad!!!

True nervous very nervous it must be the eye ! perhaps we have all been watching the classic Tell Tale Heart short on youtube! but why would you call me mad...

[vidvic]

I can't believe this thread! what utter nonsense! A man who's dedicated the last God knows how many years trying to prove Bamber didn't do it, steals a photograph which has never been in the defence's domain before and then doesn't give it to Simon Mckay? Sends it by post? Doesn't send it electronically to someone? Come on people!!

[mertol22]

I can't believe this thread! what utter nonsense! A man who's dedicated the last God knows how many years trying to prove Bamber didn't do, steals a photograph which has never been in the defence's domain before and then doesn't give it to Simon Mckay? Sends it by post? Doesn't send it electronically to someone? Come on people!!

you aint seen nothing yet

[Roch]

I can't believe this thread! what utter nonsense! A man who's dedicated the last God knows how many years trying to prove Bamber didn't do, steals a photograph which has never been in the defence's domain before and then doesn't give it to Simon Mckay? Sends it by post? Doesn't send it electronically to someone? Come on people!!

Isn't he saying he stored electronically?  I agree though, it would be given to Simon McKay without doubt, if it existed.

[guest154]

Is that the route you would have taken? Simon McKay?

[vidvic]

a picture of such importance that it 'might' be stored on an old computer somewhere?

[mertol22]

Time will tell as long as its there its quality will be constant ready to make copies.

[vidvic]

Is that the route you would have taken? Simon McKay?

wouldn't you in that situation? He's the boss right now, he's the guy with the freedom to decide what to do with it.

[Roch]

Is that the route you would have taken? Simon McKay?

Would you have taken it to The Guardian?

[vidvic]

Time will tell as long as its there its quality will be constant ready to make copies.

Time will tell? I would respectfully suggest that now would be a good time!!

[guest154]

Would you have taken it to The Guardian?

No, I don't like the Guardian all that much. I would have hired my own solicitor and put him in touch with Bamber.
But the photograph wouldn't get him outta the jail any way.

[vidvic]

Mat. If I was in Mike's situation I would have anonomously sent this photo to everyone with even a slight interest in the case. I would have shouted it from the roof tops.

[vidvic]

and, if it was PII then it's still PII now, so why suddenly admit to breaking the law, telling us where it's stored and risking arrest?

[Roch]

But the photograph wouldn't get him outta the jail any way.

Possibly.  But depending on the content, positioning, other items in the pic and combined with the logs, the wet blood photos etc, it could potentially cause serious difficulties for the authorities.  There would certainly be explaining to do.  Which fits in with their current strategy, which is to hope something doesn't come to light... but if it does, find a lame excuse to explain it. 

Obstruct / dripfeed / explain piecemeal.