How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[tez28]

Doley has it completely backwards. Evidence used as grounds for appeal must be new evidence.

HOLD ON A MINUTE!!!! NO I HAVEN'T GOT IT BACKWARDS!!!!THAT PHOTOGRAPH WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THE TRIAL...IT IS NOT NEW EVIDENCE!! BECAUSE IT WASN'T USED IS A DIFFERENT MATTER, BUT IT STILL WONT GET JB OUT..HE KNOWS IT AND SO DO HIS LEGAL TEAM!NONE OF US LIKE MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE..BUT SADLY WE ALL HAVE A GOOD IDEA HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS..I DON.T BELIEVE THERE IS A PERSON ALIVE WOULD WANT ANYONE WHO IS INNOCENT BEHIND BARS..IF THIS PHOTOGRAPH COULD HAVE HELPED IT WOULD HAVE BEEN USED BY NOW!   

[guest154]

I said that I have a desire to speak to JM and that if anyone could put me in touch with her, or at least get her to reply to an email I'd appreciate it.

Maybe that came across 'creepy'.

[Bridget]

HOLD ON A MINUTE!!!! NO I HAVEN'T GOT IT BACKWARDS!!!!THAT PHOTOGRAPH WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THE TRIAL...IT IS NOT NEW EVIDENCE!! BECAUSE IT WASN'T USED IS A DIFFERENT MATTER, BUT IT STILL WONT GET JB OUT..HE KNOWS IT AND SO DO HIS LEGAL TEAM!NONE OF US LIKE MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE..BUT SADLY WE ALL HAVE A GOOD IDEA HOW THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORKS..I DON.T BELIEVE THERE IS A PERSON ALIVE WOULD WANT ANYONE WHO IS INNOCENT BEHIND BARS..IF THIS PHOTOGRAPH COULD HAVE HELPED IT WOULD HAVE BEEN USED BY NOW!

Turn the caps off.

It wasn't available to the  defence, was it.

[tez28]

The none panties may be true. But THAT being visible in the photograph...isn't. Mark my words, if Mike ever posts the photograph.......or anyone does and it is published online/in the papers it won't be crude like that.

Maybe Mike siad that so he had an excuse to not post it on the forum - but really there was another reason why he didn't want to post it at that time.

SO YOU WHO SAYS IT'S NOT TRUE...HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPH? I HAVE! WHY SHOULD ANYONE LISTEN TO YOU? DON'T SPEAK ABOUT SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT! I KNOW WHAT I SAW!!!YOU OR ANYONE CAN NOT TELL ME DIFFERENT!

[tez28]

Turn the caps off.


It wasn't available to the  defence, was it.

WASN'T IT?

[guest154]

SO YOU WHO SAYS IT'S NOT TRUE...HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPH? I HAVE! WHY SHOULD ANYONE LISTEN TO YOU? DON'T SPEAK ABOUT SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT! I KNOW WHAT I SAW!!!YOU OR ANYONE CAN NOT TELL ME DIFFERENT!

Oh, trust me. I can certianly tell you different. I beleive you to be lying and what you have done is read Mike's posts and copied.

I believe Mike made up the panties story as an excuse to hold off on posting the picture for a little while... understandable.

[HMEssex]

I said that I have a desire to speak to JM and that if anyone could put me in touch with her, or at least get her to reply to an email I'd appreciate it.

Maybe that came across 'creepy'.

This is what you said:


If anyone here has a direct line to Mugford then you're more than welcome to tell her to actually reply to me, or anyone else who has contacted her on my behalf. Feel free to tell her what I've told you. About the anoymous phone call made from 65246.

I'm sure you'll peak her interest. I'm DESPERATE for contact with her.

Why would we have direct line to JM?!   And why would she reply to you?  Contact her yourself if you're so DESPERATE.

[guest154]

Well you never know who is reading these forums. Someone who knows the family, knows the police who worked the case or knows Mugford could indeed check out these forums.
It's not likely but there is a chance.

And I threw in the numbers so that someone may tell her if they did contact her so that she knows I am not some nutter wanting to slate her for her evidence.

[tez28]

Oh, trust me. I can certianly tell you different. I beleive you to be lying and what you have done is read Mike's posts and copied.

I believe Mike made up the panties story as an excuse to hold off on posting the picture for a little while... understandable.

GIVE YOUR HEAD A SHAKE!!! JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT MAKES ANYTHING THAT ANYONE ELSE AS SEEN AS LIES? ABOUT TIME YOU TOOK A CHILL PILL !! YOU TALK ABSOLUTE CRAP !!

[guest154]

By keep on saying that I haven't seen it, are you trying to make me say if I have?

[HMEssex]

Well you never know who is reading these forums. Someone who knows the family, knows the police who worked the case or knows Mugford could indeed check out these forums.
It's not likely but there is a chance.

And I threw in the numbers so that someone may tell her if they did contact her so that she knows I am not some nutter wanting to slate her for her evidence.

Yeah right!

[tez28]

By keep on saying that I haven't seen it, are you trying to make me say if I have?

I'M TELLING YOU THAT YOU DON'T HAVE MY EYES !! YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THROUGH THEM... BUT YOU THINK YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT I SAW..SORRY OTHER MUPPET'S MIGHT TAKE THAT SORT OF TALK FROM YOU BUT I WON'T. DON'T TELL ME SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT!! THAT'S WHAT I'M TELLING YOU..WHY HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPH? IS THAT WHY YOUR SO RUDE? BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ONLY YOU THAT'S SEEN IT? I CAN SPEAK FOR MYSELF AND I'VE SEEN IT!!

[guest154]

Yeah right!

I made that VERY clear at the time. Maybe you should try and get an understanding of who everyone is before you doubt so easily.

[ajross]

This is what you said:


If anyone here has a direct line to Mugford then you're more than welcome to tell her to actually reply to me, or anyone else who has contacted her on my behalf. Feel free to tell her what I've told you. About the anoymous phone call made from 65246.

I'm sure you'll peak her interest. I'm DESPERATE for contact with her.

Why would we have direct line to JM?!   And why would she reply to you?  Contact her yourself if you're so DESPERATE.

Oh yeah, I did read that and I did think it was a little strangely worded

[ajross]

Mat - so for what reason can you not just go over there and confront her? I am no doubt being ignorant but if you are so desperate then she is easy to find!