How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[G]

G - It's not a suggestion but I was just wondering, some of you guys have been here for a long time, clearly you know eachother either from here or in other ways but have any of you ever met up to sit down and thrash out some of the points of this case?

Yes.

[ajross]

Yes.

and was it productive?

[Buddy]

Mike I am so angry I could spit!! I have been on this forum for over a year now and this has got to be one of the most insulting threads I have ever seen you start. Do you think we are all simpletons? You are not a nieve member of the public who has taken an interest in this case. You know exactly how the police/court/prison system works. You yourself have challenged the courts over your own conviction years BEFORE you met Bamber and got involved in his case. You expect us to believe you sent an original photograph, without keeping a copy, of a scene which could turn a lifers conviction on its head, to a cat A prisoner with a note and expected him to get it??!! You must think we are really stupid. I have believed in you all this time Mike but now I am seriously starting to question your honesty.

Janet, I agree with you. I do not believe one word of this, and find it ingenuous.
I am not a patsy who will gobble up all that is posted.
Mike is a streetwise person who would never post the photo to Jeremy, without taking a copy. I will not be led by the nose on this. Mike is telling a massive fib, which helps no one. I have now slipped to 60-40 that Jeremy is innocent.

[G]

and was it productive?

It was very interesting and I gained a lot of information from the discussion. I think that one BIG fault of the internet forum is that none of us know who each other are really like. So even if we get on with a certain person there is always an element of doubt in our minds about that person? We, whether we admit it or not always keep part of ourselves back from the rest of the members. And of course there is always that unknown element of "personality" which is very difficult to put across to other people.
So a personal meeting is always the best thing to do if it is possible of course? Even a phone call is helpful in this regard.

[G]

Janet, I agree with you. I do not believe one word of this, and find it ingenuous.
I am not a patsy who will gobble up all that is posted.
Mike is a streetwise person who would never post the photo to Jeremy, without taking a copy. I will not be led by the nose on this. Mike is telling a massive fib, which helps no one. I have now slipped to 60-40 that Jeremy is innocent.

I feel I must stand with you and Janet on this one. If I possed such a picture and gave a copy of it to the CCRC and the CCRC said nothing about it. I would certainly have published it by now. In fact I would have flooded the internet with it and every known paper who would publish it.

[susan]

Hi Buddy  I am sure Mike will have more than one copy of the said photo but for reasons not known to us he is keeping quiet about it just now.  Mike is too street wise to let such a photo out of his possession without keeping copies and I really can,t see why he would make the story up what has he to gain.Perhaps I,m naive.

[HMEssex]

Hi Buddy  I am sure Mike will have more than one copy of the said photo but for reasons not known to us he is keeping quiet about it just now.  Mike is too street wise to let such a photo out of his possession without keeping copies and I really can,t see why he would make the story up what has he to gain.Perhaps I,m naive.

I agree with this.  It's a typical Mike ploy/test!  I'm waiting to see what unravels.

[Buddy]

Hi Buddy  I am sure Mike will have more than one copy of the said photo but for reasons not known to us he is keeping quiet about it just now.  Mike is too street wise to let such a photo out of his possession without keeping copies and I really can,t see why he would make the story up what has he to gain.Perhaps I,m naive.

If so just post it, and i WILL KEEP MY GOB SHUT

[mike tesko]

There are things you should all know about what really happened once I removed the the photo' of Sheila on the bed?

There are things you should all know about what was happening in the build up to the occasion I took the photograph, and sent it to Jeremy at HMP Full Sutton under the privilege rule of 37A...

[mertol22]

Mike is privilage rule 37A specific?  only letters can be sent to the prisoner i.e nothing else ,this may explain the interception.

[Gillian]

Instead of dangling the carrot in front of our noses which you do so very often Mike why don't you stop playing games and just come out and say it? 

[Gillian]

Hi Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi) - I totally agree with your post.   

[mertol22]

Anything that can help jeremy needs to be coming out now not next year or year after, i will say jeremy could mount another case for appeal but after that thats it no more , time is of the essance.

[tonyb]

Anything that can help jeremy needs to be coming out now not next year or year after, i will say jeremy could mount another case for appeal but after that thats it no more , time is of the essance.

The only "essence" on this thread is good old country air....

[Gillian]

Hi mertol22 - I totally agree.