Poppymeze and Propaganda

[JackiePreece]

Since the Documentary Poppymeze has written the most terrible things about what she thinks about it.  Poppymeze has no legal background or legal expertise and has no experiance with the media.  Not only that she claims to have written many letters to MP's without ANY success in helping Jeremy Bamber.
I believe she has set out to cause serious trouble for Simon McKay and Mark Willians-Thomas by her behaviour and posts on twitter and without a shadow of a doubt she will be damaging Jeremys chance of getting his conviction overturned. Not only has she said awful things about the documentary she has blatently lied about my connection with Simon McKay and somehow cause some sort of conflict between Simon and myself. As everyone on this forum knows I had initial contact with Simon getting him interested in the case and then putting him in touch with Jeremy.  I am disgusted that her behaviour could in some way influence if Simon wanted to continue to represent Jeremy when he has continual attacks like his involvement in the documentary.  Simon is one of the very best lawyers in this country and nobody could have done more than him.

I have listed below the nasty comments that poppymeze has made re the documentary in red and you will see when I challenge her she does not want to debate it.

in blue when I challenge her about what she says about myself and Simon she then says she no longer has the emails

The women is a troublemaker and I am disgusted with her LOL which I take to mean Laugh out loud

She cannot debate when someone challenges her


my comments are in green

The messages need to be read from bottom to top







Subject: Fwd:
From: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:53:50 +0100




Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:


From: Jackie Preece <[email protected]>
Date: 8 April 2012 17:27:31 GMT+01:00








Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
05/04/2012 10:23
@jackiepreece @simonmckay


I don't keep my emails.Sorry 2 say Jackie it's u tht hs fantasy issues.Best nt cntct agn alwys leads 2 probs

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187832868750364672






From:[email protected]
Date: 5 April 2012 04:58:35 GMT+01:00
To: "Jackie Preece" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Reply-To:[email protected]


Morning Jackie -
I'm not sure I fully understand but thanks for letting me know. You're right: I have no time to engage in what I consider to be misplaced and petty stand offs about Jeremy or his case. None of it assists his cause in the slightest and every moment spent on these matters could be more productively used on the case itself.
Best wishes, SMcKay Law Solicitors & Advocates, Carlshead Business Centre, Paddock House Lane, Sicklinghall, Leeds, LS22 4BJ
T: 0845 123 5571
F: 0845 123 5572
W: www.mckaylaw.co.uk






From: Jackie Preece <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:23:20 +0100
To: [email protected]


Simon
Just to let you know I have blocked Poppymeze now and I have never ever said you are a close friend. I am so fed up with this rubbish and the attacks on Mark I am sure you have more important stuff to be worried about.
Best wishes
Jackie








Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 21:20


@jackiepreece My opinion Jackie and nothing u can say will change it - so let it go. Nitey Nite

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187635723330007041




























jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 21:01

@PoppyMeze you started the conservation and I was responding to this and the word vile After ITV's vile prog on Je...http://t.co/goamDdB
https://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187630931237023744



jackie preece (@jackiepreece
Please show me where I have said Simon is a close friend so I can show Simon?  Or is it another fantasy?







(@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 21:00
@simonmckay


Just 2 add Jackie Preece who calls u her close friend started this conversation - not me!https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187630853197799424









Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 20:54
@PoppyMeze @simonmckay @jackiepreece @mwilliamsthomas @bambertweets


4 wot it's worth the prog was crap but lets just 4get it

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187629349741137921






Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 11:47
@jackiepreece @simonmckay @mwilliamsthomas @bambertweets


 LoL
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187491586567962624






jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 11:44

@PoppyMeze apparently he doesn't feel betrayed and I should imagine he would love to work with Mark if he ever got ...http://t.co/nDwidIl
https://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187490724089044992









Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 11:42
@jackiepreece @bambertweets @mwilliamsthomas @simonmckay


Jackie I do not have the time or inclination.2 debate it-let's leave it there..https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187490194683998209






jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 11:41

@PoppyMeze that's your opinion Poppy not the opinion of the general public and I prefer to go with the judgement of the legal expertshttps://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187489979230994433




Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 11:40
@jackiepreece @simonmckay @mwilliamsthomas @Bambertweets


bully for everyone other than Jeremy, who mst b feelg betrayed-I wld https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187489716738850816






jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 11:38
@PoppyMeze @bambertweets @mwilliamsthomas @simonmckay I am confused now are you saying 90% or - 90% Do you not thin...http://t.co/mJhf2KJ
https://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187489418846810113








Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 11:36
@jackiepreece




 Crimes that Shook was far superior-I thnk it was a mistake-still water under the bridge now



https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187488787796992000






jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 11:32
@PoppyMeze in my opinion the last documentary which Title Productions made and the Campaign team had an input gave Bob Miller a free hand to say what he wanted. A very bad decision



http://t.co/prAGuEX
https://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187487782007091201
















Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
04/04/2012 11:32
@jackiepreece @bambertweets @mwilliamsthomas


-90% character assassination of J & validation of his scheming relatives   http://poppymeze.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/jeremy-bamber-anthony-pargeter.html
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187487774943887362






jackie preece (@jackiepreece):
04/04/2012 11:29
@PoppyMeze I completely disagree, I have 2,400 followers and the feedback has been excellent. Simon is Jeremys lawy... http://t.co/Pb6azexhttps://twitter.com/jackiepreece/status/187486982300119041






Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
03/04/2012 14:23




After ITV's vile prog on Jeremy Bamber, a reminder COLP IPCC & Gov.ment do know the truth. http://poppymeze.blogspot.com/2011/11/justice-4jeremy-read-my-lips-letter-to.html via @PoppyMeze @Bambertweets
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/187168542695755777






Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
01/04/2012 08:53




ITV I 'Jeremy Bamber-New Evidence' was a betrayal of him.4 the truth visit

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/ And affiliate site:http://jeremybamber.org/
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/186360560605069312










Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
31/03/2012 10:44

If u watched JeremyBamber-NEW EVIDENCE Docu on ITV last Thurs & r wondring wot happnd 2 the other 90%  Read-my-lips: http://poppymeze.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/jeremy-bamber-night-of-tragedy.html
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/186026081390829568






Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
30/03/2012 09:28
@MariaPerez672 @
@mwilliamsthomas


 l baffled @ lack of balnce.I've docs that shw police hd contact wth S in hse.Wndr hw J feels?I email hm nw

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185644766791335937


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 22:38
@simonmckay @mwilliamsthomas @Bambertweets


.Wilson's speech was out of context & deliberately provocative.Balanced? Huh!


https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185481039152558081


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 22:26
@mazmac54 @simonmckay @mwilliamsthomas


Jeremy's innocent and many of us were banking on some integrity in this prog.Huh media?I'm off 2 bed

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185478076921155584


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 22:22
@FreeBamberNow @mwilliamsthomas @SCLomax


Did u say enjoy?https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185477132460359681


@FreeBamberNow


If you enjoyed the programme by @mwilliamsthomas tonightfind our more in the book by @SCLomax




Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 22:20
@mazmac54


I'm mor upset with the crap docu 2nite ITV Jeremy@Bambertweets-Was hopeful of balanced view.Silly-me

 @simonmckay @mwilliamsthomas
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185476469181517825










Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 20:25
@PoppyMeze @InJusticeUK @guardian


 I mean 'in' the bloody hope


https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185447669097955329


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 20:24
@PoppyMeze @InJusticeUK @guardian


However, I'm gonna watch the repeat on the hope I missed something positive.

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185447245938827264


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 20:22
@InJusticeUK @poppymeze @guardian


 I'm disappointed with the ITV prog 2nite - especially as they gave that ?>#+! the last word!

https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185446888747708417


Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):
29/03/2012 20:19
@simonmckay @Bambertweets @felicitygerry


Very disappointed with ITV1Bamber prog 2 nite - I found it balanced - NOT



https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185445992894701570










Poppy Ann Miller (@PoppyMeze):This was retweeted by poppymeze before the documentary
29/03/2012 10:45RT @simonmckay: Been great working with @mwilliamsthomas again over last few weeks. Do watch Bamber: the new evidence ITV1, 29 March 2012 at 1930 hours
https://twitter.com/PoppyMeze/status/185301568042696705
Sent from my iPhone

[JackiePreece]

I have many messages that show people thought the documentary was a very high standard which I will start to post here but lets start with Richard Gaisford Chief Correspondent, Daybreak and ITV Breakfast

He hears it was excellent

Good comments from someone current and in the news

But the official campaign team and poppymeze know better as does John Lamberton where Daniele Hammond leading the official campaign team is a member and posts

[grahameb]

Well it is just two different opinions about the documentary. It was good in that it presented the new evidence. But to my mind it wasn't great. I rather think that the documentary was built up in the public eye so much that it delivered far less than what it said it was going to?

The truth is it left some people quite flat and disappointed in what was presented. For one thing it did give a lot of time to those who say JB is guilty and that is I think what angers some people? Perhaps Mark Williams-Thomas can create another documentary which will contain a far more comprehensive look at all recent newly discovered evidence, which in my humble opinion would have a greater effect upon public opinion?

However. As I have said before I think the program succeeded in what it set out to do and that was to present clearly the new evidence that has been presented to the CCRC which I believe puts the CCRC in such a position that they must refer JB's case to the court of appeal in a way that a comprehensive presentation would not be able to do. For that is all the CCRC needs in order for them to refer the case and not a whole bunch of evidence at this particular time?
So I think that those who disagree with the program should look at it in those terms rather than looking for a lot of new evidence. Just one item of new evidence is all that is needed.

[mertol22]

It beggars the question if only the gun tests were done years ago,its taken all this time to get this far.

[grahameb]

It beggars the question if only the gun tests were done years ago,its taken all this time to get this far.

Another thing in my opinion concerning the tests is that they used "pig's skin" which is tougher and more resistant to burning with the end of a hot rifle. Human skin is much much more sensitive and also varies from person to person and therefore would be much more susceptible to burning at a very much lower temperature. This I know from painful experience. Also another vital point which was left out of the equation is that dead flesh reacts differently to live flesh.

[mertol22]

Yes thats a fair point, womens skin is much softer and more delicate than mens skin thats why there will always be more female cosmetics than mens, also Sheila was still a young lady her skin would have changed very little in life from leaving school, women s skin is very delicate.I would assume the tests were done to compare a non living comparison , however i do believe Sheila would still have been warm after death.

[JackiePreece]

Interesting post from poppymeze this morning on twitter is she now saying there were positive things about the documentary

[JackiePreece]

or by making ridiculous and unfounded comments like this is she after her 5 minutes of fame