People Are Playing Games With Jeremys Life and Freedom

[Hartley]

Rubbish

Are you collecting? 

[JackiePreece]

David_Frank quiet on the other forum is it with 6 members?

[JackiePreece]

Hartley your mate is on but she's in disguise

[Buddy]

Yes you are absolutely correct, as I said yesterday to Mertol, I have absolutely no affiliation to any of the family members, never even met them. I have no inside information, I just happen to be a capable researcher and fraudulently pass off information as having come from a more direct source.

Okay Cliff/Buddy/Pip? Any chance you now fancy toning down the unprovoked insults?

Cheers.

Okay Steve as long as you reciprocate

[Hartley]

Okay Steve as long as you reciprocate

You've lost me, before today I haven't even acknowledged your existence for as long as I can remember, despite your continual insults.

If you have an issue, then it has nothing to do with me.

[campion]

  Who was I taunting ? 

[Buddy]

You've lost me, before today I haven't even acknowledged your existence for as long as I can remember, despite your continual insults.

If you have an issue, then it has nothing to do with me.

What, you have taken great delight in humiliating me. You no longer exist to me now.
You need to grow up Steve and realise that this is not all about YOU.

[JackiePreece]

Hartley while you are on can you find out if Jeremys conviction is overturned how quickly does he get the keys cars land etc back because it will all be rightfully his then wont it

Just a rough timescale or do you think Anne would leave immediately like the next day because shes lost

[Roch]

  Who was I taunting ?

Campion, I was referring to your posts about there having been no response from the other side of the fence, re the Arizona experts' findings.  These in turn triggered Hartley's first post about the CCRC making their decision etc. 

[campion]

 Aha, I thought it was for taking the piss out of the jaywalking rabbit ! 

[JackiePreece]

Can I just add I was with someone when I found the rabbit and they confirmed he was in good health he didnt have mix a whatever it was

[JackiePreece]

Hartley while you are on can you find out if Jeremys conviction is overturned how quickly does he get the keys cars land etc back because it will all be rightfully his then wont it

Just a rough timescale or do you think Anne would leave immediately like the next day because shes lost

Has  Hartley gone?  didnt he like my question?

[VORTEX]

No it just proves that they are aware of all parties and all victims involved in one of the most bloody crimes of recent times. Imo.

Hartley, I'd really feel like a "victim" if I had been convicted on the silencer evidence!

Lets recap:
1) "Lucky find" of a silencer in a cupboard even after the same cupboard had been searched by Police.
2) Someone had the clever idea of moving the "lucky find" - very bright indeed.
3) David Boutflour decides to scrape blood off it because it "fascinates" him before handing to the Police.
4) As a afterthought we'll let the Police know we have it and they can pop over and pick it up.

I don't believe a word of the relatives silencer story and THE SILENCER SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN USED IN EVIDENCE. The fact you or Vidvic will not agree on this point makes me feel you will never see events from any other viewpoint but the relatives. How ridiculous was it to move key evidence, tamper with it and  then still expect it to be used to convict someone of murder.

On the silencer evidence alone ........Jeremy should have been leaving court in a Taxi in 86.

[Buddy]

Has  Hartley gone?  didnt he like my question?

Tail between his legs Jackie

[Blodwynflower]

Hartley, I'd really feel like a "victim" if I had been convicted on the silencer evidence!

Lets recap:
1) "Lucky find" of a silencer in a cupboard even after the same cupboard had been searched by Police.
2) Someone had the clever idea of moving the "lucky find" - very bright indeed.
3) David Boutflour decides to scrape blood off it because it "fascinates" him before handing to the Police.
4) As a afterthought we'll let the Police know we have it and they can pop over and pick it up.

I don't believe a word of the relatives silencer story and THE SILENCER SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN USED IN EVIDENCE. The fact you or Vidvic will not agree on this point makes me feel you will never see events from any other viewpoint but the relatives. How ridiculous was it to move key evidence, tamper with it and  then still expect it to be used to convict someone of murder.

On the silencer evidence alone ........Jeremy should have been leaving court in a Taxi in 86.

Absolutely.