People Are Playing Games With Jeremys Life and Freedom

[JackiePreece]

Rochy
dont worry about it he is genuinely worried he wont be able to afford his next beans on toast

[Hartley]

I don't want to come across belligerent.  Just cant work out if you're fishing for bites or genuinely in the know.

No that's fine, I completely understand. Time will no doubt answer your q's.

[Roch]

No that's fine, I completely understand. Time will no doubt answer your q's.

Again, you're making out as if you are in the know.  It's inconceivable that you would at this stage, come on to here shouting the odds, only to be then shot down by a decision to refer.  It's either strange behaviour on your part or you are informed about something that allegedly neither Simon McKay nor the relatives are.   Why have Vic on here towing the official line, saying the that the relatives are in the dark, while you are sending crude smoke signals to the opposite effect?

[Hartley]

Again, you're making out as if you are in the know.  It's inconceivable that you would at this stage, come on to here shouting the odds, only to be then shot down by a decision to refer.  It's either strange behaviour on your part or you are informed about something that allegedly neither Simon McKay nor the relatives are.   Why have Vic on here towing the official line, saying the that the relatives are in the dark, while you are sending crude smoke signals to the opposite effect?

As I said yesterday, I wasn't aware that I was. 

[grahameb]

Hartley's just playing and winding people up. No harm done at the end of the day. But I trust Vic's word.

[tyler]

Playing? As in having a joke?
Well,I for one think that joking about a mans life is disgusting!
Simon should be the first person to be told of the CCRC's decision in order that he can break the news gently to Jeremy if the decision is a negative one for him.I believe that it is usual for an inmate to be put on suicide watch if they have received bad news?How dangerous if any negative decision is leaked to Jeremy unnoficially,and the prison authorities are unprepared.

[Roch]

Bah, cant be bothered with it.

[grahameb]

Playing? As in having a joke?
Well,I for one think that joking about a mans life is disgusting!
Simon should be the first person to be told of the CCRC's decision in order that he can break the news gently to Jeremy if the decision is a negative one for him.I believe that it is usual for an inmate to be put on suicide watch if they have received bad news?How dangerous if any negative decision is leaked to Jeremy unnoficially,and the prison authorities are unprepared.

I agree with you Tyler. This kind of playing around could easily get back to Jeremy and cause deep depression in the man.

[Hartley]

Yes, playing around in that manner would be heinous indeed!!!

[Hartley]

It's interesting to note that the CCRC came to a preliminary decision last year, a full two weeks prior to announcing it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/bamber-must-wait-two-weeks-for-appeal-result-2200348.html

What is the current estimated timescale for a decision to be announced?

[ngb1066]

It's interesting to note that the CCRC came to a preliminary decision last year, a full two weeks prior to announcing it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/bamber-must-wait-two-weeks-for-appeal-result-2200348.html

What is the current estimated timescale for a decision to be announced?

Probably next week.  Simon McKay, Jeremy himself and the family are likely to be given advance notice of the decision, probably a day before the decision is made public.  Jeremy will be told by the prison governor.

 

[Hartley]

Probably next week.  Simon McKay, Jeremy himself and the family are likely to be given advance notice of the decision, probably a day before the decision is made public.  Jeremy will be told by the prison governor.

Thanks NGB.

[Hartley]

Hartley's just playing and winding people up. No harm done at the end of the day. But I trust Vic's word.

I think certain people on this forum have an amazing aptitude for winding themselves up.

I made an error in a ponderous post about the possible response of the CCRC to the recent 'Arizonian tests' should there be no referral, my error was to miss out a couple of words at the beginning of the sentence which potentially altered the meaning, or at least opened up the option of an alternative interpretation.

I discovered the error a mere minute after posting, in my horror, I quickly logged back on to the forum and edited my post, correcting it so that it could not be misinterpreted.

What has since followed is rather bizarre and to be fair I could have nipped it in the bud, however, the stupidity and aggressive/abusive reaction from certain quarters became amusing to me and I thought I'd let them show a little bit of their true nature before setting them straight.

Rochy, I apologise for not setting you right sooner, I should have PM'd you as I did with others, it's not your responses which I have described above, I genuinely find you to be a good chap and entirely reasonable in the way that you conduct yourself.

_____________

Newsflash over. 



 

[grahameb]

I think certain people on this forum have an amazing aptitude for winding themselves up.

I made an error in a ponderous post about the possible response of the CCRC to the recent 'Arizonian tests' should there be no referral, my error was to miss out a couple of words at the beginning of the sentence which potentially altered the meaning, or at least opened up the option of an alternative interpretation.

I discovered the error a mere minute after posting, in my horror, I quickly logged back on to the forum and edited my post, correcting it so that it could not be misinterpreted.

What has since followed is rather bizarre and to be fair I could have nipped it in the bud, however, the stupidity and aggressive/abusive reaction from certain quarters became amusing to me and I thought I'd let them show a little bit of their true nature before setting them straight.

Rochy, I apologise for not setting you right sooner, I should have PM'd you as I did with others, it's not your responses which I have described above, I genuinely find you to be a good chap and entirely reasonable in the way that you conduct yourself.

_____________

Newsflash over. 

Hmm. Obviously you also omitted to pm any of the moderators. Unfortunately it was not only certain of us in the forum that were misled. But it appeared to be a deliberate act of yours to evade certain direct questions. Far from revealing the "true" characters of some on the forum you did however succeed in revealing a lot about your own character.

[Hartley]

Hmm. Obviously you also omitted to pm any of the moderators. Unfortunately it was not only certain of us in the forum that were misled. But it appeared to be a deliberate act of yours to evade certain direct questions. Far from revealing the "true" characters of some on the forum you did however succeed in revealing a lot about your own character.

Yes, that I can rise above the abuse.