People Are Playing Games With Jeremys Life and Freedom

[Hartley]

I think we get the message Hartley.  The family have been told that there will be no referral and furthermore, the response to the new submissions will open some people's eyes.

I was just replying to Grahames post, I'm sure that's acceptable to you?

[Roch]

I was just replying to Grahames post, I'm sure that's acceptable to you?

I've got no problem with you replying to anyone's post.  I'm merely pointing out that you are going out of your way to state something without actually stating it.  Message received and understood.  There's no need for any further heavy hints.

I await with interest what the defence are prepared to release, in the wake of expected decision.

[nugnug]

i would say if the crcc dont refer the case jermy bamber would have good grounds to ask the for a juridical review of that decision.

[guest7363]

are the ccrc supposed to be talking to the family.

I think they will be, the family will be classed as a third party and if you look on the ccrc website about discloure it covers the fact that it can disclose to a third party if i read it right?

[campion]

 Rochford, Don't you think with all the interest in the press's relationship with the Police at the Leveson
Inquiry, there may be a bombshell coming regarding when the NOWT/Julie Mugford deal took place ? 

[Hartley]

I've got no problem with you replying to anyone's post.  I'm merely pointing out that you are going out of your way to state something without actually stating it.  Message received and understood.  There's no need for any further heavy hints.

I await with interest what the defence are prepared to release, in the wake of expected decision.

I wasn't aware I was going out of my way to state anything. 

[Roch]

I wasn't aware I was going out of my way to state anything. 

Then you must have been somehow unaware, that for a few days you have been doing an impression of someone going out of their way to state something without actually doing so.  I don't want to drag up all your posts over the last few days but you have gone out of your way to give the impression that the decision has already been made and is a negative one, from a defence perspective. 

[campion]

 Can anyone explain why the number of people interested in this case has increased more this time around than last year and the interest is not only being maintained but growing ?   

[grahameb]

It appears that the CCRC have an agenda and nothing is going to sway them from that. NOT EVEN THE TRUTH.

[Hartley]

Then you must have been somehow unaware, that for a few days you have been doing an impression of someone going out of their way to state something without actually doing so.  I don't want to drag up all your posts over the last few days but you have gone out of your way to give the impression that the decision has already been made and is a negative one, from a defence perspective.

Very strange, yes I have been completely unaware that people were hanging on my every word. I don't want to drag out all of the old posts, but I was actually under the impression that nobody cared what I had to say, or rather people actively ignored what I posted.

Bearing that in mind, I'm sure you can appreciate the shock and bewilderment that I experienced when reading your previous post, it seems that people have actually gone out of their way to decipher any hint or clue contained in one of my posts.

Cracking decision though.

[maggie]

You tease hartley!!

[Hartley]

You tease hartley!!

So it appears. 

[Roch]

Very strange, yes I have been completely unaware that people were hanging on my every word. I don't want to drag out all of the old posts, but I was actually under the impression that nobody cared what I had to say, or rather people actively ignored what I posted.

Bearing that in mind, I'm sure you can appreciate the shock and bewilderment that I experienced when reading your previous post, it seems that people have actually gone out of their way to decipher any hint or clue contained in one of my posts.

Cracking decision though.

I'm not sure why you are posting in this strange / strained manner that you have been of late.  It seems unnecessary.  Your hints weren't exactly covert.   

[Hartley]

I'm not sure why you are posting in this strange / strained manner that you have been of late.  It seems unnecessary.  Your hints weren't exactly covert.   

If you are not sure, then perhaps they were. 

[VORTEX]

Very strange, yes I have been completely unaware that people were hanging on my every word. I don't want to drag out all of the old posts, but I was actually under the impression that nobody cared what I had to say, or rather people actively ignored what I posted.

Bearing that in mind, I'm sure you can appreciate the shock and bewilderment that I experienced when reading your previous post, it seems that people have actually gone out of their way to decipher any hint or clue contained in one of my posts.

Cracking decision though.

I have no problem ignoring you Hartley. You are in the families pocket (and I suspect in some way on the pay roll) and they appear to play you like a 2 bit banjo. You spin and steer every discussion in their favour and appear completely unable to see any other view but theirs - are they really worth all the effort? I struggle to understand how they can be so sure their view is correct. The fact of the matter is you or the family don't really know if Jeremy is innocent or guilty. It would be very inconvenient for you all if he turned out to be innocent, hence you fight this battle endlessly.