Author Topic: Essex Police's Credibility  (Read 33990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2012, 11:54:AM »
  Still no response from the Guilty camp, are they recalibrating their Roch Index. What is wrong, why can't they discredit the gun tests. Sika, what was it you put, "clutching at straws". This is turning into a rout. Where does the Guilty argument stand on the Silencer evidence. Come on you weasels, justify it's credibility. What about the Aga surround scratchmarks made by the silencer that was on the gun that was used to kill Shelia. Why the silence !!!!!!   

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2012, 02:12:PM »
  This could be the icing for Gillian's cakes. Jeff Edwards, the Crime Reporters Association President and former News of the World Crime Reporter tells the Leveson Inquiry a couple of weeks before the MWT documentary, that a News of the World editor told him to "put some inducements out there" to get stories. A few weeks later the same editor told him "You should essentially be bribing more Police Officers". Edwards left the News of the World in1985, he observed an "element in there, who had a tendency towards questionable unethical behaviour". That tendency manifested itself in a variety of ways he said, with some reporters appearing to play " fast and loose with the truth". Jeff Edwards was telling this to Robert Jay QC, otherwise known as the "Pied Piper" 16th March at the Leveson Inquiry. 

Offline haughton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #32 on: April 04, 2012, 03:48:PM »
  humpty dumpty was pushed ( by the EP )

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2012, 04:35:PM »
  Haughton, Do you think EP would appreciate an Easter Egg that looks Like Humpty Dumpty ? 

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2012, 04:39:PM »
  humpty dumpty was pushed ( by the EP )

They would have got all the kings horses and all the kings men to carry out a training exercise and restage Humpty to make it look like suicide.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #35 on: April 04, 2012, 04:51:PM »
  I am sure they could frame Jeremy for it if Julie was offered some cash !!!   

Offline haughton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #36 on: April 04, 2012, 05:13:PM »
I think the EP blamed it on the CIA

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #37 on: April 04, 2012, 05:23:PM »
  And it would give Millers theory about Jeremy carrying out the cunning deed dressed in a wetsuit extra
weight, because he would have been covered in egg white. Then they could bring in his mothers bicycle as the getaway vehicle. Only flaw with this is by the time he had peddled back to Goldhanger he would have resembled a Baked Alaska.   

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #38 on: April 04, 2012, 05:39:PM »
   Stan Jones could go round to Jeremy's cottage and arrest him for murder, then whisk him off in a panda car.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #39 on: April 04, 2012, 07:03:PM »
  Essex Police ruled out Julie's claim of the involvement of a hitman as half baked, unlike Gillians cakes which are always baked to perfection.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2012, 04:57:PM »
 This is the job description of a Chief Medical Examiner. A Chief Medical Examiner is the Official In Charge
of investigating unexpected,sudden,suspicious or violent deaths. He seeks to establish the cause of death. He is also responsible for providing pathological and toxicological services necessary to assist the investigation of deaths that raise Public Inquiry. The Chief Medical Examiner takes up a supervisory role, overseeing the work of Medical Examiners. Three of these concluded a silencer was not used on Shelia. 

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2012, 06:13:PM »
  And it would give Millers theory about Jeremy carrying out the cunning deed dressed in a wetsuit extra
weight, because he would have been covered in egg white. Then they could bring in his mothers bicycle as the getaway vehicle. Only flaw with this is by the time he had peddled back to Goldhanger he would have resembled a Baked Alaska.
Well whenever I wore a wetsuit I felt very restricted whilst on land and quickly got out of breath through any kind of exertion like running. The reason for that is that a wetsuit holds the body very tightly.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2012, 06:56:PM »
 Grahame, After these latest tests that imply that no silencer was on the rifle when Shelia shot herself, and that on last years submissions regarding the silencers actual date of discovery and role in this awful tragedy. As far as I can see the wetsuit/bicycle theory and other ludicrous propositions made by the Police and endorsed by the CPS are now in tatters. The forensic evidence for the two silencers becomes null and void. The Crime Scene Album produced for the original trial is worthless and going on from this, as this was all part of the evidence against Jeremy, I am positive that the handswabs have either been forged or taken after the Police washed Shelia's hands. The case against Jeremy is falling apart at the seams by the day and yet still the guilty camp can't come up with any response (even a grunt) that can shore up the safety of the conviction. 

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #43 on: April 05, 2012, 07:00:PM »
Grahame, After these latest tests that imply that no silencer was on the rifle when Shelia shot herself, and that on last years submissions regarding the silencers actual date of discovery and role in this awful tragedy. As far as I can see the wetsuit/bicycle theory and other ludicrous propositions made by the Police and endorsed by the CPS are now in tatters. The forensic evidence for the two silencers becomes null and void. The Crime Scene Album produced for the original trial is worthless and going on from this, as this was all part of the evidence against Jeremy, I am positive that the handswabs have either been forged or taken after the Police washed Shelia's hands. The case against Jeremy is falling apart at the seams by the day and yet still the guilty camp can't come up with any response (even a grunt) that can shore up the safety of the conviction.

I think several posters have backed off a bit for reasons not case or evidence related.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Essex Police's Credibility
« Reply #44 on: April 05, 2012, 07:19:PM »
Grahame, After these latest tests that imply that no silencer was on the rifle when Shelia shot herself, and that on last years submissions regarding the silencers actual date of discovery and role in this awful tragedy. As far as I can see the wetsuit/bicycle theory and other ludicrous propositions made by the Police and endorsed by the CPS are now in tatters. The forensic evidence for the two silencers becomes null and void. The Crime Scene Album produced for the original trial is worthless and going on from this, as this was all part of the evidence against Jeremy, I am positive that the handswabs have either been forged or taken after the Police washed Shelia's hands. The case against Jeremy is falling apart at the seams by the day and yet still the guilty camp can't come up with any response (even a grunt) that can shore up the safety of the conviction.

I just think it's nearly run it's course, I'm interested in the case but bored of the arguments (none case related).

My personal opinion is that your post above contains a whole host of sweeping unsubstantiated conclusions, however my opinion isn't really worth a damn and you are obviously more than entitled to form your own opinion.

I think that you have been taken in by some defence propaganda and that it will become apparent when the CCRC announce their decision. I understand that you have a different view, but I have no interest in trying to change yours or anybody else's view.

It's not that I can't come up with a response, (I could probably come up with a compelling argument that black is actually blue), it's just simply that I don't feel that I need to respond, or even grunt.

The CCRC will respond (I don't think they grunt) and that's the only response that's going to count.

'In my humble opinion'