Grahame, After these latest tests that imply that no silencer was on the rifle when Shelia shot herself, and that on last years submissions regarding the silencers actual date of discovery and role in this awful tragedy. As far as I can see the wetsuit/bicycle theory and other ludicrous propositions made by the Police and endorsed by the CPS are now in tatters. The forensic evidence for the two silencers becomes null and void. The Crime Scene Album produced for the original trial is worthless and going on from this, as this was all part of the evidence against Jeremy, I am positive that the handswabs have either been forged or taken after the Police washed Shelia's hands. The case against Jeremy is falling apart at the seams by the day and yet still the guilty camp can't come up with any response (even a grunt) that can shore up the safety of the conviction.
I just think it's nearly run it's course, I'm interested in the case but bored of the arguments (none case related).
My personal opinion is that your post above contains a whole host of sweeping unsubstantiated conclusions, however my opinion isn't really worth a damn and you are obviously more than entitled to form your own opinion.
I think that you have been taken in by some defence propaganda and that it will become apparent when the CCRC announce their decision. I understand that you have a different view, but I have no interest in trying to change yours or anybody else's view.
It's not that I can't come up with a response, (I could probably come up with a compelling argument that black is actually blue), it's just simply that I don't feel that I need to respond, or even grunt.
The CCRC will respond (I don't think they grunt) and that's the only response that's going to count.
'In my humble opinion'