Author Topic: Big mistake  (Read 47962 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #195 on: March 09, 2012, 05:32:PM »
Yes but why unscrew it in the first place if not to put the silencer on it?

The end cap would have been unscrewed in order to enable the silencer to be attached.  When the silencer was removed the cap was not screwed back on, either because it was intended to screw the silencer back on or because he could not be bothered.  I store my rifles, most of which have a sound moderator available, without the end cap screwed on and without the sound moderator. 


Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #196 on: March 09, 2012, 05:33:PM »
Grahame - I do in fairness have to take issue with you here.  Andrea's post was unfortunate and unwise and no doubt posted in anger.  It is not correct to equate Andrea's post with the filth on the Lamberton forum.  Andrea should not be placed in the same category as some of those over there.
Fair do's guvnor.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #197 on: March 09, 2012, 05:43:PM »
Curious did you see DV8 skip off in the distance to the land of magic mushrooms

No challenge
No denial
Nothing

But I can bet the venom is coming thick and fast from the safety of the other forum

He will skip back on when Neils left

I would love to see what IT looks like
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

tyler

  • Guest
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #198 on: March 09, 2012, 05:55:PM »
Jackie,is DV8 the same person that sent you those disgusting and threatening text messages that you once posted on here?

Newbury1

  • Guest
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #199 on: March 09, 2012, 06:01:PM »
Curious, remember my scale of guilt?  Maybe we should each give ourselves a number, representative of the percentage mark we subscribe to?  This number could be placed under our username / avatar.

For example, I be 25.  You would be 70.  Mike would be 0.  Hartley would be 95. etc.

The only problem with this is that it would force 'pro' posters to admit doubt, by way of their avoidance of a 0 figure.   :o

I've inserted my level of guilt under username / avatar as suggested, are you, and will others follow?

I don't see problem with guilty or innocent posters putting their number on their sleeve , so to speak - 100 or 0.

In both cases it would show how committed they are to their beliefs!

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #200 on: March 09, 2012, 06:16:PM »
Tyler the very one

I think they are on here somewhere
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

tyler

  • Guest
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #201 on: March 09, 2012, 06:20:PM »
Tyler the very one

I think they are on here somewhere

I had a nasty feeling that he was one and the same person.
Im really shocked that he is allowed to be a member here.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #202 on: March 09, 2012, 06:23:PM »
Tyler he came in disguise as they all do!!
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #203 on: March 09, 2012, 06:23:PM »

Maybe some on here simply want to see the forum unfairly balanced in favour of the JB innocent side!When two opposing sides get together it is inevitable there will be conflict.

If however the forum wants a closed community of the same thinking then so be it - the forum has definitely taken a step that way with the recent banning!


This is a JB is innocent site, Nick. Have you not noticed this?

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #204 on: March 09, 2012, 06:24:PM »
Nick I disagree the forum has gone downhill

Lots of new people are joining and I am sure the banned people will be back

Everyone prefers it if there could be a better mix of anti s and pro s and I am sure some new members will be antis without going the personal insult route like DV8

I have had over a 100 new followers on twitter this week and I am sure some will find there way here


Well said, Jackie.

Newbury1

  • Guest
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #205 on: March 09, 2012, 06:28:PM »

This is a JB is innocent site, Nick. Have you not noticed this?

Yes, I have noticed it leans that way - do you only want JB innocent posters?

Offline curiousessex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1418
  • ROCH INDEX 70
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #206 on: March 09, 2012, 06:29:PM »
I've inserted my level of guilt under username / avatar as suggested, are you, and will others follow?

I don't see problem with guilty or innocent posters putting their number on their sleeve , so to speak - 100 or 0.

In both cases it would show how committed they are to their beliefs!

I have completed my ROCH INDEX number

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #207 on: March 09, 2012, 06:34:PM »
Yes, I have noticed it leans that way - do you only want JB innocent posters?


I thought you weren't talking to me?

No, I don't want only JB is innocent posters to post here. I want posters of any persuasion - who are prepared to debate without launching into toxic personal attacks - on the forum.

tyler

  • Guest
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #208 on: March 09, 2012, 06:35:PM »
Yes, I have noticed it leans that way - do you only want JB innocent posters?
Nick........you and curious and bob arnt exactly pro Bamber,but are all valued members of the forum,and long standing ones too.
All of you challenge Mike and other forum members in a respectful way and stimulate debate....and not slanging matches.
Do you see where Im coming from?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Big mistake
« Reply #209 on: March 09, 2012, 06:36:PM »
I have completed my ROCH INDEX number

Duly noted.  I've completed my ROCH INDEX no. also