Bambers Legal Team Also Representing Vinter & Moore

[ngb1066]

See my post above, they all had different representatives at one stage.

I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand it a little bit better.

I do not know the circumstances in this particular case but I imagine that when the ECHR said that they would consider the three cases together it was agreed between the applicants that one set of legal representatives would act for all three. 

[Hartley]

I do not know the circumstances in this particular case but I imagine that when the ECHR said that they would consider the three cases together it was agreed between the applicants that one set of legal representatives would act for all three.

And that happened to be Jeremys legal team (Brown Woods I think?), which then got to concentrate solely on the ECHR application when Simon Mckay took over the application to the CCRC?

Is that correct then?

[campion]

                         News International know Jeremy Bamber is Innocent

[nugnug]

im sure they do but then again they don't really care.

[ngb1066]

And that happened to be Jeremys legal team (Brown Woods I think?), which then got to concentrate solely on the ECHR application when Simon Mckay took over the application to the CCRC?

Is that correct then?

The two were not connected.  Barry Woods of Cousins Tyrer had been representing Jeremy on both matters.  Barry Woods was at some stage instructed by the other two ECHR applicants.  Separately, and unconnected with that, Jeremy instructed Simon McKay in place of Barry Woods in relation to the CCRC application.

 

[Hartley]

The two were not connected.  Barry Woods of Cousins Tyrer had been representing Jeremy on both matters.  Barry Woods was at some stage instructed by the other two ECHR applicants.  Separately, and unconnected with that, Jeremy instructed Simon McKay in place of Barry Woods in relation to the CCRC application.

Okay that's making sense. So for all intents and purposes, at this time, Barry Woods is no longer acting for Jeremy, as his duties in regards to the application to the ECHR are complete.

[ngb1066]

Okay that's making sense. So for all intents and purposes, at this time, Barry Woods is no longer acting for Jeremy, as his duties in regards to the application to the ECHR are complete.

Yes, that is correct.

[Roch]

Rochy why don't you share who the interested parties are with us?

Lately you appear to contact the official campaign team and they feed you whatever and then send you trotting back here like a tame poodle  with cryptic messages

Please do not believe all you are told it is better you trust your own judgement instead of what people decide they want to feed you

What do you think is going to happen with JB s refferal?

I have only ever contacted the campaign team on two occasions.  Once approx July/August last year in relation to a video.  I received no response.  Once in November / December about a campaign suggestion.  I received a positive response and I aim to get back to them.  The allegation about interested parties being more concerned re a positive ECHR for Jeremy, rather than a referral to Court of Appeal, did not come from anyone linked to the campaign.  In answer to your question Jackie, I remain cautious about a referral to Court of Appeal.  Not because I believe Jeremy doesn't have very good grounds.  My caution stems from what I have learned about the systems we have.. and from what I believe to be obstruction in this particular criminal case.

Strangely enough I would say it's the other way around, more concern would be given to the application to the CCRC. Basically because even if the ECHR came back in favour of Jeremy, it would actually make little difference to his chances of being released any time soon.

This is a rare occasion where I agree with you Hartley.  The CCRC application has always been far more important to Jeremy than the ECHR application.

If what was relayed to me is correct, about some of those who are following events having a reverse view, then it begs the question why they would hold that position? 

[Hartley]

If what was relayed to me is correct, about some of those who are following events having a reverse view, then it begs the question why they would hold that position?

I have no idea, perhaps the information that has been relayed to you is inaccurate?

Of course, nobody (or me at least) knows who you are referring to, so it's difficult to really make much of a comment. 

[ngb1066]

I have no idea, perhaps the information that has been relayed to you is inaccurate?

Of course, nobody (or me at least) knows who you are referring to, so it's difficult to really make much of a comment. 

I can only say what Jeremy's view is, which is that the CCRC application has always been more important to him than the ECHR application.  It is common sense really, in view of the potential outcome in each case.

[Hartley]

It is common sense really, in view of the potential outcome in each case.

I agree.

[Roch]

I will see if I can get any further info on to the thread, direct from source, as opposed to from my own recollection.  I'm not arguing with the opinions of Hartley or Neil on this.  Simply relaying what was passed to me quite some time ago. 

[Jackiepreece]

Rochy

I dont need to go into detail about the 'Official Campaign Team Bamber' i think everyone knows how I feel I just dont want people laughing behind your back.  I have personal experiance

If you have any good ideas you need to go higher up the food chain

Anyway its good to see that Simon McKay has taken over the press interviews himself

We are at last getting somewhere!!!!!!!!!

[Newbury1]

Anyway its good to see that Simon McKay has taken over the press interviews himself

Is there anything on the internet in respect of these press interviews?

[tyler]

Is there anything on the internet in respect of these press interviews?

Simon tweeted that he has done interviews for BBC radio and ITV
but I havent found anything else as yet.