Fundamental mistake made by COLP about who found silencer?

[mike tesko]

According to the contents of the labs General Examination Record, dated, 13th August 1985, the silencer received at the lab' had an identifying mark of SBJ/1, yet when Glynis Howard made her statement regarding this matter she refers to the exhibit reference for the silencer as being DRB/1, which it was not, and could not possibly have been at that stage, since Cook did not send a handwritten note to MDF asking him to amend the silencer reference to DB/1, until 17th October 1985

[mike tesko]

When COLP pointed out this discrepancy to Glynis Howard, she said she was not aware the exhibit reference (SBJ/1) had been changed, and she could not explain why she refers to her handling of the silencer on 13th August 1985, where she  refers to it as DRB/1?

[mike tesko]

When COLP pointed out this discrepancy to Glynis Howard, she said she was not aware the exhibit reference (SBJ/1) had been changed, and she could not explain why she refers to her handling of the silencer on 13th August 1985, where she  refers to it as DRB/1?

The inclusion of the silencer reference as being marked DRB/1, came about because the DPP produced a composite witness statement in her name, suggesting the silencer exhibit reference was always DRB/1, when the deeper you look into this, it had other exhibit references at various stages, namely, SJ/1, SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1...