Generally speaking, what I am saying is that references to a dog barking, should be treated as a possible reference to exchanges and communications made by Sheila with firearms officers at the scene. Now these exchanges were not made on a direct one to one basis, but were responses made by Sheila to challenges being made to the occupants of the farmhouse, by the firearms officers, which Sheila did respond to, during a one hour period between 5;25am and 6;30am...
The truth of the matter is, from what I have been told, is that (1) police made challenges to the farmhouse using a loud hailer, and (2) Sheila gave responses, which have been recorded in the disclosed logs as a dog barking, but the fact is that police at the scene did not hear these responses directly, only via the telephone eavesdrop which had been patched through to them at the scene by the operator. Now the information I have received, is that Sheila was not to know that the firearms officers outside the farmhouse could not hear her responses directly, and that they only heard them through the patched up eavesdrop, as described...
This is part of the information I have been provided with...
