And so to the truth of the matter (how Sheila communicated with police)?

[Buddy]

You've lost me a bit there Rochy. 

I think he means the guilty page Harts

[Hartley]

I think he means the guilty page Harts

Oh, okay. 

[Newbury1]

I think the police dog handler at the scene should have dealt with this - not the TFU   

[Roch]

I meant on Rantville.  Where the other lot live.  Better find a tin hat from somewhere quick.

[grahameb]

Well, that is the information I have received, and it was as a result of Sheila adopting these tactics that she was able to keep the wolf from the door so to speak. The firearms team had never come up against such a diversionary tactic before, and they did not know what to do for the best?

It was evident that by the time Sheila rested the rifle against the bedroom window at about 7.15am, the polIce were completely and utterly convinced that she was quite literally 'barking mad and off her head`...

More significantly...

she was known to be in possession of a loaded gun...

What that when your informant chucked a brick through your rear car window and shouted, "Don't forget to tell them will you".

[Hartley]

I meant on Rantville.  Where the other lot live.  Better find a tin hat from somewhere quick.

Can't you just ignore them?

[Buddy]

Can't you just ignore them?

Thats not the point Harts.
Sorry to invade your post Roch.

[grahameb]

Can't you just ignore them?

I personsally don't go there. But people on here just keep reminding me of those munchkins who live in the merry old land of OZ.

[bob]

You've lost me a bit there Rochy. 

I think Rochy is suggesting that the kind of madness that Mike has posted at the start of this thread is an open goal for the commentators over in Lambyland.

I could be wrong though (about what Rochy means - I'm definitely not wrong about the original post being comedy gold  ).

[Buddy]

I think Rochy is suggesting that the kind of madness that Mike has posted at the start of this thread is an open goal for the commentators over in Lambyland.

I could be wrong though (about what Rochy means - I'm definitely not wrong about the original post being comedy gold  ).

Do keep up Bob

[tonyb]

Information has been received to suggest how during a one hour period, Sheila communicated with police at the scene by her mimicking A barking, whining dog, which served to confuse the firearms officers into not being able to pinpoint her position inside the farmhouse, due to the family pet dog also barking and reacting to Sheila`s antics? These diversionary tactics served to keep police at bay, until WPC Jeapes spotted the rifle which Sheila lolled against the bedroom window...

what drivel. whatever next...

[mike tesko]

There is already documentary evidence that within a window of opportunity between 5.25am and 6.30am, firearms officers were in conversation with someone from inside the farm, and it is also documented that the sound of a dog was heard to barking from within the farmhouse. Now, since the police were aware of the type of dog inside the farmhouse, why is it that the barking which was heard was not specifically attributed to the dog in question?

Since, at 5.25am, firearms officers were in conversion with A person from inside the farm, and there are instances of dog barking from within the same farmhouse, how can anyone prove that it was not a person making the noises that were recorded as dog barks?

[vidvic]

Who gave you this wonderful information?

[Roch]

I think Rochy is suggesting that the kind of madness controversy that Mike has posted at the start of this thread is an open goal for the commentators over in Lambyland pro boards forum

Can't you just ignore them?

[vidvic]

Roch? How do you do the 'crossed out but still readable' thing?