Author Topic: the lack of eyewitness  (Read 1619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
the lack of eyewitness
« on: January 09, 2012, 04:12:PM »
there were no eye witness who say jermy bamber going to or from whf.

now this may unsaualy considering it was night time in the countryside.

but i would of thought there must have been some cars down that way whose occupants could have spotted him.

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2012, 04:34:PM »
there were no eye witness who say jermy bamber going to or from whf.

now this may unsaualy considering it was night time in the countryside.

but i would of thought there must have been some cars down that way whose occupants could have spotted him.

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2012, 04:36:PM »

Don't think so Nugs. It is not a place you would normally go, unless you were into dogging.[ so I am told]

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2012, 04:38:PM »
Friday woods is better.[so I am told] :-[

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2012, 04:38:PM »
did people do that in the 80s

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2012, 04:51:PM »
did people do that in the 80s
Probably Nugs. I will check with my informant. [Slack Alice]
« Last Edit: January 09, 2012, 04:54:PM by Buddy »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2012, 04:55:PM »
cottaging went on in the 80s well so im told but im not sure about dogging i though that was relatively new.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2012, 04:56:PM by nugnug »

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2012, 04:58:PM »
cottaging went on in the 80s well so im told but im not sure about dogging i though that was relatively new.
You are awful Nugs. but I like you. ;)

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2012, 05:35:PM »
Set back from the road, other than poaching , shooting game i see it unusual for there to be any witnesses, would still have been dark.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: the lack of eyewitness
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2012, 06:28:PM »
Don't think so Nugs. It is not a place you would normally go, unless you were into dogging.[ so I am told]
Pages Lane is on the main Tollesbury road.